Ahmed Marey, Ona Ambrozaite, Ahmed Afifi, Ritu Agarwal, Rama Chellappa, Sola Adeleke, Muhammad Umair
{"title":"A perspective on AI implementation in medical imaging in LMICs: challenges, priorities, and strategies.","authors":"Ahmed Marey, Ona Ambrozaite, Ahmed Afifi, Ritu Agarwal, Rama Chellappa, Sola Adeleke, Muhammad Umair","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-12031-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) promises to accelerate and democratize medical imaging, yet low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face distinct barriers to adoption. This perspective identifies those barriers and proposes an action-oriented roadmap.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Insights were synthesized from a Johns Hopkins Science Diplomacy Hub workshop (18 experts in radiology, AI, and health policy) and a scoping review of peer-reviewed and grey literature. Workshop discussions were transcribed, thematically coded, and iteratively validated to reach consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five interlocking barriers were prioritized: (1) infrastructure gaps-scarce imaging devices, unstable power, and limited bandwidth; (2) data deficiencies-small, non-representative, or ethically constrained datasets; (3) workforce shortages and brain drain; (4) uncertain ethical, regulatory, and medicolegal frameworks; and (5) financing and sustainability constraints. Case studies from Nigeria, Uganda, and Colombia showed that low-field MRI, cloud-based PACS, community-engaged data collection, and public-private partnerships can successfully mitigate several of these challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Targeted policy levers-including shared procurement of low-cost hardware, regional AI and data hubs, train-the-trainer workforce programs, and harmonized regulation-can enable LMIC health systems to deploy AI imaging responsibly, shorten diagnostic delays, and improve patient outcomes. Lessons are transferable to resource-constrained settings worldwide.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question How can LMICs overcome infrastructure, data, workforce, regulatory, and financing barriers to implement artificial-intelligence tools in clinical medical imaging? Findings Our multinational consensus identifies five obstacles and maps each to actionable levers: low-cost hardware, regional data hubs, train-the-trainer schemes, harmonized regulation, blended financing. Clinical relevance Implementing these targeted measures enables LMIC health systems to deploy AI imaging reliably, shorten diagnostic delays, and improve patient outcomes while reducing dependence on external expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12031-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) promises to accelerate and democratize medical imaging, yet low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face distinct barriers to adoption. This perspective identifies those barriers and proposes an action-oriented roadmap.
Materials and methods: Insights were synthesized from a Johns Hopkins Science Diplomacy Hub workshop (18 experts in radiology, AI, and health policy) and a scoping review of peer-reviewed and grey literature. Workshop discussions were transcribed, thematically coded, and iteratively validated to reach consensus.
Results: Five interlocking barriers were prioritized: (1) infrastructure gaps-scarce imaging devices, unstable power, and limited bandwidth; (2) data deficiencies-small, non-representative, or ethically constrained datasets; (3) workforce shortages and brain drain; (4) uncertain ethical, regulatory, and medicolegal frameworks; and (5) financing and sustainability constraints. Case studies from Nigeria, Uganda, and Colombia showed that low-field MRI, cloud-based PACS, community-engaged data collection, and public-private partnerships can successfully mitigate several of these challenges.
Conclusions: Targeted policy levers-including shared procurement of low-cost hardware, regional AI and data hubs, train-the-trainer workforce programs, and harmonized regulation-can enable LMIC health systems to deploy AI imaging responsibly, shorten diagnostic delays, and improve patient outcomes. Lessons are transferable to resource-constrained settings worldwide.
Key points: Question How can LMICs overcome infrastructure, data, workforce, regulatory, and financing barriers to implement artificial-intelligence tools in clinical medical imaging? Findings Our multinational consensus identifies five obstacles and maps each to actionable levers: low-cost hardware, regional data hubs, train-the-trainer schemes, harmonized regulation, blended financing. Clinical relevance Implementing these targeted measures enables LMIC health systems to deploy AI imaging reliably, shorten diagnostic delays, and improve patient outcomes while reducing dependence on external expertise.
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.