Unveiling the role of lumbar intervertebral space morphology: a novel classification and its impact on cage migration in lumbar fusion surgery.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Yang Hou, Lei Liu, Tianyi Zhao, Yongfei Guo, Jiangang Shi
{"title":"Unveiling the role of lumbar intervertebral space morphology: a novel classification and its impact on cage migration in lumbar fusion surgery.","authors":"Yang Hou, Lei Liu, Tianyi Zhao, Yongfei Guo, Jiangang Shi","doi":"10.1186/s40001-025-03261-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to establish a novel classification system for lumbar intervertebral spaces based on anatomical morphology, to investigate the relationship between intervertebral space types and cage migration risk after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), and to optimize fusion strategies tailored to different anatomical types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 103 patients who underwent TLIF between February 2022 and June 2023. Lumbar intervertebral spaces were classified into 3 fundamental types: lordotic, neutral and kyphotic and 2 modified types: normal and degenerative. Clinical outcomes (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS], Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), and radiographic parameters (Intervertebral Space Angle [ISA], Intervertebral Space Height [ISH], Intervertebral Foramen Height [IFH]) were evaluated. Statistical analyses included t tests, ANOVA, chi-square tests, and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VAS and ODI scores significantly improved postoperatively (P < 0.05). ISA, ISH, and IFH showed significant postoperative increases across all fundamental types. Cage migration occurred in 8 segments, predominantly in degenerative-type intervertebral spaces. Logistic regression revealed that the degenerative type was associated with a 17-fold increased risk of cage migration (OR = 17.02). No significant association was found between fundamental type and migration. Fusion rates exceeded 98% across all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel classification of lumbar intervertebral spaces effectively predicts cage migration risk. The degenerative modified type is a strong risk factor for migration. Tailoring surgical strategies to intervertebral space morphology may improve stability and outcomes in lumbar interbody fusion procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"1003"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12542467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-03261-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to establish a novel classification system for lumbar intervertebral spaces based on anatomical morphology, to investigate the relationship between intervertebral space types and cage migration risk after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), and to optimize fusion strategies tailored to different anatomical types.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 103 patients who underwent TLIF between February 2022 and June 2023. Lumbar intervertebral spaces were classified into 3 fundamental types: lordotic, neutral and kyphotic and 2 modified types: normal and degenerative. Clinical outcomes (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS], Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), and radiographic parameters (Intervertebral Space Angle [ISA], Intervertebral Space Height [ISH], Intervertebral Foramen Height [IFH]) were evaluated. Statistical analyses included t tests, ANOVA, chi-square tests, and logistic regression.

Results: VAS and ODI scores significantly improved postoperatively (P < 0.05). ISA, ISH, and IFH showed significant postoperative increases across all fundamental types. Cage migration occurred in 8 segments, predominantly in degenerative-type intervertebral spaces. Logistic regression revealed that the degenerative type was associated with a 17-fold increased risk of cage migration (OR = 17.02). No significant association was found between fundamental type and migration. Fusion rates exceeded 98% across all groups.

Conclusion: The novel classification of lumbar intervertebral spaces effectively predicts cage migration risk. The degenerative modified type is a strong risk factor for migration. Tailoring surgical strategies to intervertebral space morphology may improve stability and outcomes in lumbar interbody fusion procedures.

揭示腰椎间隙形态的作用:一种新的分类及其对腰椎融合手术中笼式移动的影响。
目的:本研究旨在建立一种基于解剖形态学的腰椎间隙分类新体系,探讨椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)后椎间隙类型与椎间笼移位风险的关系,并针对不同解剖类型优化融合策略。方法:对2022年2月至2023年6月期间接受TLIF治疗的103例患者进行回顾性队列研究。腰椎间隙分为3种基本类型:前凸型、中性型和后凸型;2种改良型:正常型和退变型。评估临床结果(视觉模拟量表[VAS]、Oswestry残疾指数[ODI])和影像学参数(椎间隙角[ISA]、椎间隙高度[ISH]、椎间孔高度[IFH])。统计分析包括t检验、方差分析、卡方检验和逻辑回归。结果:术后VAS评分和ODI评分明显提高(P)。结论:新的腰椎间隙分类可有效预测腰椎笼移位风险。变性改良型是迁移的一个强烈危险因素。根据椎间隙形态调整手术策略可以改善腰椎椎体间融合术的稳定性和疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Medical Research
European Journal of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信