Performance of Two-Tiered Subclassification of Atypia of Undetermined Significance in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Without Routine Molecular Testing.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Pocholo D Santos, Chiung-Ru Lai, Jen-Fan Hang
{"title":"Performance of Two-Tiered Subclassification of Atypia of Undetermined Significance in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Without Routine Molecular Testing.","authors":"Pocholo D Santos, Chiung-Ru Lai, Jen-Fan Hang","doi":"10.1002/dc.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The third edition of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology recommends a simplified two-tiered subclassification of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), dividing cases into AUS with nuclear atypia (AUS-Nuclear) and other atypia (AUS-Other). This study aims to evaluate the performance of these subcategories in estimating the risk of malignancy (ROM) in a setting without routine molecular testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases diagnosed as AUS between 2018 and 2023. Surgical pathology reports were matched with the FNA-targeted nodules to enable cyto-histologic correlation. ROM and risk of neoplasm (RON) were calculated for all AUS cases and for each subcategory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 16,030 thyroid FNA cases, 617 (3.8%) were diagnosed as AUS. Histologic follow-up was available in 190 cases. Final diagnoses included non-neoplastic lesions (42.6%), benign neoplasms (17.4%), low-risk neoplasms (5.3%), and malignant neoplasms (34.7%). The ROM for AUS-Nuclear was significantly higher at 54.7%, compared to 14.7% for AUS-Other (p < 0.001). Similarly, the RON was significantly higher in the AUS-Nuclear group (67.4%) than in the AUS-Other group (47.4%) (p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AUS-Nuclear carries a substantially higher ROM than AUS-Other, with a ROM (54.7%) comparable to the reported positive predictive values of molecular assays such as Afirma GSC (47%, 95% CI: 36%-58%) and ThyroSeq v3 (66%, 95% CI: 56%-75%). These findings support the clinical utility of the two-tiered AUS subclassification in enhancing risk stratification, particularly in settings where molecular testing is not routinely available.</p>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.70034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The third edition of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology recommends a simplified two-tiered subclassification of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), dividing cases into AUS with nuclear atypia (AUS-Nuclear) and other atypia (AUS-Other). This study aims to evaluate the performance of these subcategories in estimating the risk of malignancy (ROM) in a setting without routine molecular testing.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases diagnosed as AUS between 2018 and 2023. Surgical pathology reports were matched with the FNA-targeted nodules to enable cyto-histologic correlation. ROM and risk of neoplasm (RON) were calculated for all AUS cases and for each subcategory.

Results: Among 16,030 thyroid FNA cases, 617 (3.8%) were diagnosed as AUS. Histologic follow-up was available in 190 cases. Final diagnoses included non-neoplastic lesions (42.6%), benign neoplasms (17.4%), low-risk neoplasms (5.3%), and malignant neoplasms (34.7%). The ROM for AUS-Nuclear was significantly higher at 54.7%, compared to 14.7% for AUS-Other (p < 0.001). Similarly, the RON was significantly higher in the AUS-Nuclear group (67.4%) than in the AUS-Other group (47.4%) (p = 0.005).

Conclusion: AUS-Nuclear carries a substantially higher ROM than AUS-Other, with a ROM (54.7%) comparable to the reported positive predictive values of molecular assays such as Afirma GSC (47%, 95% CI: 36%-58%) and ThyroSeq v3 (66%, 95% CI: 56%-75%). These findings support the clinical utility of the two-tiered AUS subclassification in enhancing risk stratification, particularly in settings where molecular testing is not routinely available.

未进行常规分子检测的甲状腺细针穿刺非典型性两级亚分类的表现。
背景:第三版Bethesda报告甲状腺细胞病理学系统推荐了一种简化的两层不确定意义非典型性(AUS)亚分类,将病例分为有核非典型性的AUS (AUS- nuclear)和其他非典型性的AUS (AUS- other)。本研究旨在评估在没有常规分子检测的情况下,这些亚类别在估计恶性肿瘤(ROM)风险方面的表现。方法:回顾性分析2018 - 2023年诊断为AUS的连续甲状腺细针穿刺(FNA)病例。手术病理报告与fna靶向结节相匹配,以实现细胞组织学相关性。计算所有AUS病例和每个亚类的ROM和肿瘤风险(RON)。结果:16030例甲状腺FNA中,617例(3.8%)诊断为AUS。190例进行组织学随访。最终诊断包括非肿瘤性病变(42.6%)、良性肿瘤(17.4%)、低危肿瘤(5.3%)和恶性肿瘤(34.7%)。us - nuclear的ROM为54.7%,高于us - other的14.7% (p结论:us - nuclear的ROM明显高于us - other,其ROM(54.7%)与Afirma GSC (47%, 95% CI: 36%-58%)和ThyroSeq v3 (66%, 95% CI: 56%-75%)等分子检测报告的阳性预测值相当。这些发现支持两层AUS亚分类在加强风险分层方面的临床应用,特别是在分子检测不常规的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostic Cytopathology
Diagnostic Cytopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Cytopathology is intended to provide a forum for the exchange of information in the field of cytopathology, with special emphasis on the practical, clinical aspects of the discipline. The editors invite original scientific articles, as well as special review articles, feature articles, and letters to the editor, from laboratory professionals engaged in the practice of cytopathology. Manuscripts are accepted for publication on the basis of scientific merit, practical significance, and suitability for publication in a journal dedicated to this discipline. Original articles can be considered only with the understanding that they have never been published before and that they have not been submitted for simultaneous review to another publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信