Marie W Sim Johnston, Amy J Lorimer, Kimberley J Haines, Edward Litton
{"title":"Experiencing Sepsis: A Meta-Ethnography.","authors":"Marie W Sim Johnston, Amy J Lorimer, Kimberley J Haines, Edward Litton","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore and synthesize the adverse and transformative experiences of sepsis survivors and their caregivers, to generate novel, experience-based insights that inform recovery support and future care strategies.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science) were searched from 2000 to 2025.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Eligible studies included qualitative or mixed-methods research reporting experiences of adult sepsis survivors and/or caregivers. Studies focusing solely on healthcare providers or published in languages other than English were excluded. Nine studies met inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>First- and second-order constructs were extracted. Study quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills program. Confidence in findings was evaluated using GRADE-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research, which assesses methodological limitations, coherence, adequacy, and relevance.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>A meta-ethnographic approach guided synthesis, using Noblit and Hare's seven-phase methodology. Five third-order themes emerged for survivors:1. Increased dependency (moderate confidence)2. ICU fog (high confidence)3. Psychological adjustment (moderate confidence)4. Gratitude and guilt in relationships (moderate confidence)5. Post-discharge challenges (moderate confidence)Three themes emerged for caregivers:1. Adapting to caregiving (moderate confidence)2. Uncertainty about the future (moderate confidence)3. Communication challenges (low confidence)Experiences were shaped by both adversity and transformation. Dependency emerged as a central theme influencing autonomy, identity, and engagement with healthcare. Caregivers experienced emotional and logistical strain, often unsupported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although deeply personal, sepsis survivorship is marked by consistent themes. Survivor experiences reveal critical insights and generate directions for research and intervention. Findings underscore the need to strengthen survivorship care by prioritizing psychological support, effective communication, and responsive post-discharge services.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006913","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To explore and synthesize the adverse and transformative experiences of sepsis survivors and their caregivers, to generate novel, experience-based insights that inform recovery support and future care strategies.
Data sources: Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science) were searched from 2000 to 2025.
Study selection: Eligible studies included qualitative or mixed-methods research reporting experiences of adult sepsis survivors and/or caregivers. Studies focusing solely on healthcare providers or published in languages other than English were excluded. Nine studies met inclusion criteria.
Data extraction: First- and second-order constructs were extracted. Study quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills program. Confidence in findings was evaluated using GRADE-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research, which assesses methodological limitations, coherence, adequacy, and relevance.
Data synthesis: A meta-ethnographic approach guided synthesis, using Noblit and Hare's seven-phase methodology. Five third-order themes emerged for survivors:1. Increased dependency (moderate confidence)2. ICU fog (high confidence)3. Psychological adjustment (moderate confidence)4. Gratitude and guilt in relationships (moderate confidence)5. Post-discharge challenges (moderate confidence)Three themes emerged for caregivers:1. Adapting to caregiving (moderate confidence)2. Uncertainty about the future (moderate confidence)3. Communication challenges (low confidence)Experiences were shaped by both adversity and transformation. Dependency emerged as a central theme influencing autonomy, identity, and engagement with healthcare. Caregivers experienced emotional and logistical strain, often unsupported.
Conclusions: Although deeply personal, sepsis survivorship is marked by consistent themes. Survivor experiences reveal critical insights and generate directions for research and intervention. Findings underscore the need to strengthen survivorship care by prioritizing psychological support, effective communication, and responsive post-discharge services.
目的:探索和综合败血症幸存者及其护理人员的不良和变革性经历,以产生基于经验的新颖见解,为康复支持和未来护理策略提供信息。资料来源:检索2000 - 2025年的MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Web of Science 5个数据库。研究选择:合格的研究包括定性或混合方法研究,报告成人败血症幸存者和/或护理人员的经历。仅关注医疗保健提供者或以英语以外的语言发表的研究被排除在外。9项研究符合纳入标准。数据提取:提取一阶和二阶结构。研究质量评估使用关键评估技能程序。研究结果的可信度采用GRADE-Confidence of Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research来评估,评估方法的局限性、一致性、充分性和相关性。数据综合:使用Noblit和Hare的七阶段方法,采用元人种学方法指导综合。对于幸存者来说,出现了五个第三层次的主题:依赖性增加(中等置信度)ICU雾(高置信度)心理调整(适度自信)人际关系中的感激和内疚(适度自信)出院后的挑战(中等信心)护理人员出现了三个主题:1。适应照顾(适度自信)对未来的不确定性(中等信心)沟通挑战(低自信)经历是由逆境和转变共同塑造的。依赖性成为影响自主性、身份认同和参与医疗保健的中心主题。护理人员经历了情感和后勤压力,往往得不到支持。结论:尽管脓毒症的生存是非常个人化的,但其特征是一致的。幸存者的经历揭示了关键的见解,并为研究和干预提供了方向。研究结果强调了通过优先考虑心理支持、有效沟通和响应性出院后服务来加强幸存者护理的必要性。
期刊介绍:
Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient.
Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.