Completing the colorectal cancer screening process: impact of eliminating cost-sharing for follow-up colonoscopy.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mallik Greene, Quang A Le, A Burak Ozbay, Jordan J Karlitz, A Mark Fendrick
{"title":"Completing the colorectal cancer screening process: impact of eliminating cost-sharing for follow-up colonoscopy.","authors":"Mallik Greene, Quang A Le, A Burak Ozbay, Jordan J Karlitz, A Mark Fendrick","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2577763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is recommended for average-risk adults, yet completion of the screening process requires follow-up colonoscopy after a positive stool-based test (SBT). Until recently, patients frequently faced out-of-pocket costs for follow-up colonoscopy, which was classified as a diagnostic procedure. In November 2022, coordinated federal policies were issued to eliminate patient cost-sharing for this procedure across commercial and Medicare insurance, effective January 2023. This study evaluated changes in follow-up colonoscopy utilization before and after implementation of these policies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a large, nationally representative health care claims resource linked with laboratory data from January 1, 2022, to December 1, 2023. Adults aged 45-75 years who underwent colonoscopy were included. Follow-up colonoscopy (a diagnostic colonoscopy performed within six months of a positive SBT) was the primary endpoint. An interrupted time series design with a seasonally adjusted segmented autoregressive model estimated changes before (January-December 2022) and after (January-November 2023) cost-sharing elimination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 10,841,411 individuals undergoing colonoscopy, follow-up procedures comprised 3.59% (95% CI, 3.18-3.99) before implementation. Following policy enactment, there was an immediate 41.2% relative increase (absolute increase 1.48% [95% CI, 1.25-1.71]; P < .001), sustained through November 2023.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elimination of patient cost-sharing for follow-up colonoscopy was associated with an immediate and sustained increase in utilization after positive stool-based tests. While other contextual factors may have contributed, these findings suggest that financial policy interventions can improve completion of the CRC screening process.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2577763","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is recommended for average-risk adults, yet completion of the screening process requires follow-up colonoscopy after a positive stool-based test (SBT). Until recently, patients frequently faced out-of-pocket costs for follow-up colonoscopy, which was classified as a diagnostic procedure. In November 2022, coordinated federal policies were issued to eliminate patient cost-sharing for this procedure across commercial and Medicare insurance, effective January 2023. This study evaluated changes in follow-up colonoscopy utilization before and after implementation of these policies.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a large, nationally representative health care claims resource linked with laboratory data from January 1, 2022, to December 1, 2023. Adults aged 45-75 years who underwent colonoscopy were included. Follow-up colonoscopy (a diagnostic colonoscopy performed within six months of a positive SBT) was the primary endpoint. An interrupted time series design with a seasonally adjusted segmented autoregressive model estimated changes before (January-December 2022) and after (January-November 2023) cost-sharing elimination.

Results: Among 10,841,411 individuals undergoing colonoscopy, follow-up procedures comprised 3.59% (95% CI, 3.18-3.99) before implementation. Following policy enactment, there was an immediate 41.2% relative increase (absolute increase 1.48% [95% CI, 1.25-1.71]; P < .001), sustained through November 2023.

Conclusion: Elimination of patient cost-sharing for follow-up colonoscopy was associated with an immediate and sustained increase in utilization after positive stool-based tests. While other contextual factors may have contributed, these findings suggest that financial policy interventions can improve completion of the CRC screening process.

完成结直肠癌筛查过程:取消结肠镜随访费用分担的影响。
推荐对平均风险的成年人进行结直肠癌(CRC)筛查,但筛查过程的完成需要在粪便试验(SBT)阳性后进行结肠镜检查。直到最近,患者还经常面临后续结肠镜检查的自付费用,结肠镜检查被归类为诊断程序。2022年11月,颁布了协调一致的联邦政策,从2023年1月起,通过商业和医疗保险取消了该手术的患者费用分摊。本研究评估了这些政策实施前后随访结肠镜检查使用率的变化。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用了2022年1月1日至2023年12月1日期间与实验室数据相关的大型、具有全国代表性的医疗保健索赔资源。接受结肠镜检查的年龄在45-75岁的成年人被纳入研究对象。随访结肠镜检查(在SBT阳性的6个月内进行的诊断性结肠镜检查)是主要终点。一个带有季节性调整分段自回归模型的中断时间序列设计估计了取消成本分摊之前(2022年1月至12月)和之后(2023年1月至11月)的变化。结果:在10,841,411例接受结肠镜检查的患者中,实施结肠镜检查前随访的患者占3.59% (95% CI, 3.18-3.99)。政策制定后,立即出现41.2%的相对增长(绝对增长1.48% [95% CI, 1.25-1.71]; P < .001),持续到2023年11月。结论:取消患者费用分摊的后续结肠镜检查与粪便检测阳性后使用率的立即和持续增加有关。虽然其他背景因素可能也有影响,但这些研究结果表明,财政政策干预可以改善结直肠癌筛查过程的完成情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信