Robert Greif, Adam Cheng, Cristian Abelairas-Gómez, Katherine S Allan, Jan Breckwoldt, Andrea Cortegiani, Aaron J Donoghue, Kathryn J Eastwood, Barbara Farquharson, Ming-Ju Hsieh, Tracy Kidd, Ying-Chih Ko, Kasper G Lauridsen, Yiqun Lin, Andrew S Lockey, Tasuku Matsuyama, Sabine Nabecker, Kevin J Nation, Alexander Olaussen, Sebastian Schnaubelt, Taylor Sawyer, Chih-Wei Yang, Joyce Yeung
{"title":"Education, Implementation, and Teams: 2025 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations.","authors":"Robert Greif, Adam Cheng, Cristian Abelairas-Gómez, Katherine S Allan, Jan Breckwoldt, Andrea Cortegiani, Aaron J Donoghue, Kathryn J Eastwood, Barbara Farquharson, Ming-Ju Hsieh, Tracy Kidd, Ying-Chih Ko, Kasper G Lauridsen, Yiqun Lin, Andrew S Lockey, Tasuku Matsuyama, Sabine Nabecker, Kevin J Nation, Alexander Olaussen, Sebastian Schnaubelt, Taylor Sawyer, Chih-Wei Yang, Joyce Yeung","doi":"10.1161/CIR.0000000000001359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation conducts continuous reviews of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science and publishes more comprehensive reviews every 5 years. The Education, Implementation, and Teams chapter of the <i>2025 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations</i> describes all published resuscitation evidence reviewed by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation's Education, Implementation, and Teams Task Force science experts since 2020. This summary addresses the evidence in 4 subchapters: (1) training populations, (2) faculty development, (3) knowledge translation and implementation, and (4) instructional design. Members from the Education, Implementation, and Teams Task Force have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task force are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. Priority knowledge gaps for further research are listed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10331,"journal":{"name":"Circulation","volume":"152 16_suppl_1","pages":"S205-S249"},"PeriodicalIF":38.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001359","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation conducts continuous reviews of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science and publishes more comprehensive reviews every 5 years. The Education, Implementation, and Teams chapter of the 2025 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Consensus on Science With Treatment Recommendations describes all published resuscitation evidence reviewed by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation's Education, Implementation, and Teams Task Force science experts since 2020. This summary addresses the evidence in 4 subchapters: (1) training populations, (2) faculty development, (3) knowledge translation and implementation, and (4) instructional design. Members from the Education, Implementation, and Teams Task Force have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task force are provided in the Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. Priority knowledge gaps for further research are listed.
期刊介绍:
Circulation is a platform that publishes a diverse range of content related to cardiovascular health and disease. This includes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other contributions spanning observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services, outcomes studies, and advancements in basic and translational research. The journal serves as a vital resource for professionals and researchers in the field of cardiovascular health, providing a comprehensive platform for disseminating knowledge and fostering advancements in the understanding and management of cardiovascular issues.