The prognostic value of atherogenic index of plasma and thin-cap fibroatheroma among patients with STEMI: an optical coherence tomography prospective cohort study of real world.

IF 10.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Xiaoxiao Zhao, Runzhen Chen, Nan Li, Linghan Xue, Chen Liu, Peng Zhou, Yi Chen, Shaodi Yan, Li Song, Hanjun Zhao, Jiannan Li, Hongbing Yan
{"title":"The prognostic value of atherogenic index of plasma and thin-cap fibroatheroma among patients with STEMI: an optical coherence tomography prospective cohort study of real world.","authors":"Xiaoxiao Zhao, Runzhen Chen, Nan Li, Linghan Xue, Chen Liu, Peng Zhou, Yi Chen, Shaodi Yan, Li Song, Hanjun Zhao, Jiannan Li, Hongbing Yan","doi":"10.1186/s12933-025-02957-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>This prospective study investigated plaque morphologies based on the underlying culprit lesion pathology in relation to the Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP) in patients with acute ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for assessment of culprit lesions. The aim of the study was to elucidate the effects of the AIP index and plaque type on the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 274 patients with STEMI aged ≥ 18 years who underwent pre-intervention OCT imaging of culprit lesions between March 2017 and March 2019 were enrolled. AIP index was calculated using the formula: log 10 (triglycerides [TG]/ high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C]). We stratified the cohort into four groups according to the presence of Thin-Cap Fibroatheroma (TCFA), as assessed by OCT, and the cutoff value of AIP: Group I consisted of patients with AIP < cutoff & without TCFA; Group II had AIP < cutoff & with TCFA; Group III included those with AIP > cutoff & without TCFA; and Group IV comprised patients with AIP > cutoff & with TCFA.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Patients in Group IV exhibited a higher prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus (p = 0.012), elevated triglyceride-glucose index (TyG) levels (p < 0.001), increased LDL-C levels (p = 0.002), higher triglycerides levels (p < 0.001), and elevated total cholesterol (p = 0.001), indicating accelerated atherosclerosis. Furthermore, individuals within higher tertiles of AIP demonstrated a greater frequency of healing plaques (p = 0.021). Among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), the AIP index exhibited a correlation with the healing of plaques (p < 0.05). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that the incidence of MACEs among patients in Group IV (AIP > cutoff & with TCFA) increased by compared to those in Group I. Kaplan-Meier analyses confirmed risk stratification for MACEs based on interactions between AIP-TCFA interaction (log-rank p = 0.027), AIP-plaque interaction (log-rank p = 0.033), AIP-mixed plaque interaction (log-rank p = 0.041), AIP-lipid plaque interaction (log-rank p < 0.001), AIP- macrophage interaction (log-rank p = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microstructural features observed via OCT for culprit lesions, combined with the AIP index-an important marker for cardiovascular disease-may be utilized clinically to support risk stratification and predict adverse events among STEMI patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9374,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","volume":"24 1","pages":"404"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-025-02957-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: This prospective study investigated plaque morphologies based on the underlying culprit lesion pathology in relation to the Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP) in patients with acute ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for assessment of culprit lesions. The aim of the study was to elucidate the effects of the AIP index and plaque type on the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs).

Methods: A total of 274 patients with STEMI aged ≥ 18 years who underwent pre-intervention OCT imaging of culprit lesions between March 2017 and March 2019 were enrolled. AIP index was calculated using the formula: log 10 (triglycerides [TG]/ high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C]). We stratified the cohort into four groups according to the presence of Thin-Cap Fibroatheroma (TCFA), as assessed by OCT, and the cutoff value of AIP: Group I consisted of patients with AIP < cutoff & without TCFA; Group II had AIP < cutoff & with TCFA; Group III included those with AIP > cutoff & without TCFA; and Group IV comprised patients with AIP > cutoff & with TCFA.

Outcomes: Patients in Group IV exhibited a higher prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus (p = 0.012), elevated triglyceride-glucose index (TyG) levels (p < 0.001), increased LDL-C levels (p = 0.002), higher triglycerides levels (p < 0.001), and elevated total cholesterol (p = 0.001), indicating accelerated atherosclerosis. Furthermore, individuals within higher tertiles of AIP demonstrated a greater frequency of healing plaques (p = 0.021). Among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), the AIP index exhibited a correlation with the healing of plaques (p < 0.05). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that the incidence of MACEs among patients in Group IV (AIP > cutoff & with TCFA) increased by compared to those in Group I. Kaplan-Meier analyses confirmed risk stratification for MACEs based on interactions between AIP-TCFA interaction (log-rank p = 0.027), AIP-plaque interaction (log-rank p = 0.033), AIP-mixed plaque interaction (log-rank p = 0.041), AIP-lipid plaque interaction (log-rank p < 0.001), AIP- macrophage interaction (log-rank p = 0.032).

Conclusion: Microstructural features observed via OCT for culprit lesions, combined with the AIP index-an important marker for cardiovascular disease-may be utilized clinically to support risk stratification and predict adverse events among STEMI patients.

STEMI患者血浆和薄帽纤维粥样硬化指数的预后价值:一项真实世界的光学相干断层扫描前瞻性队列研究。
背景和目的:这项前瞻性研究调查了急性st段升高的心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的斑块形态,这些患者接受了初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)来评估罪魁祸首病变,基于潜在的罪魁祸首病变病理与血浆粥样硬化指数(AIP)的关系。本研究的目的是阐明AIP指数和斑块类型对主要心血管不良事件(mace)发生率的影响。方法:共纳入274例年龄≥18岁的STEMI患者,这些患者于2017年3月至2019年3月期间接受了罪魁祸首病变的干预前OCT成像。AIP指数计算公式为:log 10(甘油三酯[TG]/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇[HDL-C])。我们根据薄帽纤维粥样瘤(Thin-Cap Fibroatheroma, TCFA)的存在(通过OCT评估)和AIP的临界值将队列分为四组:第一组包括有AIP临界值和没有TCFA的患者;第四组包括AIP >截止和TCFA患者。结果:IV组患者糖尿病患病率较高(p = 0.012),甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数(TyG)水平升高(p截断值和TCFA)与i组相比升高。Kaplan-Meier分析证实了基于AIP-TCFA相互作用(log-rank p = 0.027)、aip -斑块相互作用(log-rank p = 0.033)、aip -混合斑块相互作用(log-rank p = 0.041)、aip -脂质斑块相互作用(log-rank p)之间相互作用的mace风险分层。通过OCT观察罪魁祸首病变的显微结构特征,结合心血管疾病的重要标志物AIP指数,可在临床上用于STEMI患者的风险分层和不良事件预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Cardiovascular Diabetology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Diabetology is a journal that welcomes manuscripts exploring various aspects of the relationship between diabetes, cardiovascular health, and the metabolic syndrome. We invite submissions related to clinical studies, genetic investigations, experimental research, pharmacological studies, epidemiological analyses, and molecular biology research in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信