Deep learning based CT images for lung function prediction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Ruihan Li, Hui Guo, Qian Wu, Jinhuan Han, Shuqin Kang
{"title":"Deep learning based CT images for lung function prediction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.","authors":"Ruihan Li, Hui Guo, Qian Wu, Jinhuan Han, Shuqin Kang","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03957-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Health Organization predicts that by 2030, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) will be the third leading cause of death and the seventh leading cause of morbidity worldwide. Pulmonary function tests (PFT) are the gold standard for COPD diagnosis. Since COPD is an incurable disease that takes a considerable amount of time to diagnose, even by an experienced specialist, it becomes important to provide an analysis of abnormalities in a simple manner. Although many deep learning (DL) methods based on computed tomography (CT) have been developed to identify COPD, the pathological changes of COPD based on CT are multi-dimensional and highly spatially heterogeneous, and their predictive performance still needs to be improved.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to develop a DL-based multimodal feature fusion model to accurately estimate PFT parameters from chest CT images and verify its performance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, participants underwent chest CT examination and PFT at the Fourth Clinical Medical College of Xinjiang Medical University between January 2018 and July 2024. In this study, the 1-s forced expiratory volume (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), 1-s forced expiratory volume ratio forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), 1-s forced expiratory volume to predicted value (FEV1%), and forced vital capacity to predicted value (FVC%) of PFT parameters were used as predictors and the corresponding chest CT of 3108 participants. The data were randomly assigned to the training group and the validation group at a ratio of 9:1, and the model was cross-validated using 10-fold cross-validation. Each parameter was trained and evaluated separately on the DL network. The mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), and Pearson correlation coefficient (r) were used as evaluation indices, and the consistency between the predicted and actual values was analyzed using the Bland-Altman plot. The interpretability of the model's prediction process was analyzed using the Grad-CAM visualization technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2408 subjects were included (average age 66 ± 12 years; 1479 males). Among these, 822 cases were used for encoder training to extract image features, and 1,586 cases were used for the development and validation of a multimodal feature fusion model based on a multilayer perceptron (MLP). The MAE, MSE, and r predicted between PFT and model estimates for FEV1 were 0.34, 0.20, and 0.84, respectively. For FVC, the MAE, MSE, and r were 0.42, 0.31, and 0.81, respectively. For FEV1/FVC, the MAE, MSE, and r were 6.64, 0.73, and 0.77, respectively. For FEV1%, the MAE, MSE, and r were 13.42, 3.01, and 0.73, respectively. For FVC%, the MAE, MSE, and r were 13.33, 2.97, and 0.61, respectively. It was observed that there was a strong correlation between the measured and predicted indices of FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and FEV1%. The Bland-Altman plot analysis showed good consistency between the estimated values and the measured values of all PFT parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The preliminary research results indicate that the MLP-based multimodal feature fusion model has the potential to predict PFT parameters in COPD patients in real time. However, it is worth noting that the study used indicators before the use of bronchodilators, which may affect the interpretation of the results. Future studies should use measurements taken after bronchodilator administration to better align with clinical standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"484"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12542279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03957-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization predicts that by 2030, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) will be the third leading cause of death and the seventh leading cause of morbidity worldwide. Pulmonary function tests (PFT) are the gold standard for COPD diagnosis. Since COPD is an incurable disease that takes a considerable amount of time to diagnose, even by an experienced specialist, it becomes important to provide an analysis of abnormalities in a simple manner. Although many deep learning (DL) methods based on computed tomography (CT) have been developed to identify COPD, the pathological changes of COPD based on CT are multi-dimensional and highly spatially heterogeneous, and their predictive performance still needs to be improved.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a DL-based multimodal feature fusion model to accurately estimate PFT parameters from chest CT images and verify its performance.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, participants underwent chest CT examination and PFT at the Fourth Clinical Medical College of Xinjiang Medical University between January 2018 and July 2024. In this study, the 1-s forced expiratory volume (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), 1-s forced expiratory volume ratio forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), 1-s forced expiratory volume to predicted value (FEV1%), and forced vital capacity to predicted value (FVC%) of PFT parameters were used as predictors and the corresponding chest CT of 3108 participants. The data were randomly assigned to the training group and the validation group at a ratio of 9:1, and the model was cross-validated using 10-fold cross-validation. Each parameter was trained and evaluated separately on the DL network. The mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), and Pearson correlation coefficient (r) were used as evaluation indices, and the consistency between the predicted and actual values was analyzed using the Bland-Altman plot. The interpretability of the model's prediction process was analyzed using the Grad-CAM visualization technique.

Results: A total of 2408 subjects were included (average age 66 ± 12 years; 1479 males). Among these, 822 cases were used for encoder training to extract image features, and 1,586 cases were used for the development and validation of a multimodal feature fusion model based on a multilayer perceptron (MLP). The MAE, MSE, and r predicted between PFT and model estimates for FEV1 were 0.34, 0.20, and 0.84, respectively. For FVC, the MAE, MSE, and r were 0.42, 0.31, and 0.81, respectively. For FEV1/FVC, the MAE, MSE, and r were 6.64, 0.73, and 0.77, respectively. For FEV1%, the MAE, MSE, and r were 13.42, 3.01, and 0.73, respectively. For FVC%, the MAE, MSE, and r were 13.33, 2.97, and 0.61, respectively. It was observed that there was a strong correlation between the measured and predicted indices of FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and FEV1%. The Bland-Altman plot analysis showed good consistency between the estimated values and the measured values of all PFT parameters.

Conclusions: The preliminary research results indicate that the MLP-based multimodal feature fusion model has the potential to predict PFT parameters in COPD patients in real time. However, it is worth noting that the study used indicators before the use of bronchodilators, which may affect the interpretation of the results. Future studies should use measurements taken after bronchodilator administration to better align with clinical standards.

基于深度学习的CT图像预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺功能。
背景:世界卫生组织预测,到2030年,慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)将成为全球第三大死亡原因和第七大发病原因。肺功能检查(PFT)是COPD诊断的金标准。由于慢性阻塞性肺病是一种无法治愈的疾病,即使由经验丰富的专家诊断也需要相当长的时间,因此以简单的方式提供异常分析变得非常重要。虽然目前已有许多基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的深度学习(DL)方法用于COPD的识别,但基于CT的COPD病理变化具有多维度和高度空间异质性,其预测性能仍有待提高。目的:建立一种基于dl的多模态特征融合模型,以准确估计胸部CT图像的PFT参数并验证其性能。材料与方法:本回顾性研究于2018年1月至2024年7月在新疆医科大学第四临床医学院进行胸部CT检查和PFT检查。本研究采用1-s用力呼气量(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)、1-s用力呼气量比用力肺活量(FEV1/FVC)、1-s用力呼气量与预测值(FEV1%)、用力肺活量与预测值(FVC%)作为PFT参数的预测指标,并对3108名受试者进行相应的胸部CT。数据按9:1的比例随机分配到训练组和验证组,采用10倍交叉验证交叉验证模型。每个参数分别在深度学习网络上进行训练和评估。以平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方误差(MSE)和Pearson相关系数(r)作为评价指标,采用Bland-Altman图分析预测值与实际值的一致性。利用Grad-CAM可视化技术分析了模型预测过程的可解释性。结果:共纳入2408例受试者,平均年龄66±12岁,男性1479例。其中822例用于编码器训练以提取图像特征,1586例用于基于多层感知器(MLP)的多模态特征融合模型的开发和验证。PFT和模型预测FEV1的MAE、MSE和r分别为0.34、0.20和0.84。FVC的MAE、MSE和r分别为0.42、0.31和0.81。FEV1/FVC的MAE、MSE和r分别为6.64、0.73和0.77。对于FEV1%, MAE、MSE和r分别为13.42、3.01和0.73。FVC%的MAE、MSE和r分别为13.33、2.97和0.61。观察到FEV1、FVC、FEV1/FVC、FEV1%的实测值与预测值之间存在较强的相关性。Bland-Altman图分析显示,所有PFT参数的估计值与实测值之间具有良好的一致性。结论:初步研究结果表明,基于mlp的多模态特征融合模型具有实时预测COPD患者PFT参数的潜力。然而,值得注意的是,该研究使用了使用支气管扩张剂之前的指标,这可能会影响结果的解释。未来的研究应使用支气管扩张剂使用后的测量,以更好地符合临床标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信