Feasibility and acceptability of remote technologies for the treatment of trauma- and stressor-related disorders in adults: mixed-methods systematic review.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Marjolaine Rivest-Beauregard, Justine Fortin, Élyse Gauthier, Michelle Lonergan, Alain Brunet, Manuela Ferrari
{"title":"Feasibility and acceptability of remote technologies for the treatment of trauma- and stressor-related disorders in adults: mixed-methods systematic review.","authors":"Marjolaine Rivest-Beauregard, Justine Fortin, Élyse Gauthier, Michelle Lonergan, Alain Brunet, Manuela Ferrari","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.10832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma- and stressor-related disorders (TSRD) are debilitating mental health conditions. Given the barriers to traditional services, remote and online technologies are increasingly used in treating TSRD.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This mixed-methods systematic review aimed to identify remote technologies and assessed their feasibility and acceptability in treating adults with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), acute stress disorder and adjustment disorder (AjD).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, PubMed and the Cochrane Library were screened to identify studies investigating the feasibility and acceptability of remote interventions for PTSD, acute stress disorder and AjD in adults. Studies that obtained poor-quality ratings on critical appraisal tools were excluded. Results were synthesised using a narrative review approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, there were 74 studies evaluating 27 remote interventions for TSRD: online interventions (<i>k</i> = 47, 63.51%), mobile applications (<i>k</i> = 17, 22.97%), video conferencing (<i>k</i> = 9, 12.16%) and message-based systems <i>(k</i> = 1, 1.35%). Findings from the review showed higher feasibility and acceptability for interventions with an interactive clinician-patient component. Among self-directed interventions, only two applications and eight online interventions provided a clinician component. Most studies targeted PTSD, with few targeting other diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recommendations related to remote interventions for TSRDs should be broadened to include AjD and other underrepresented diagnoses, and tailored to individual patients' profiles, including their ability to sustain engagement and clinical needs, using a stepped-care approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 6","pages":"e247"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10832","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trauma- and stressor-related disorders (TSRD) are debilitating mental health conditions. Given the barriers to traditional services, remote and online technologies are increasingly used in treating TSRD.

Aims: This mixed-methods systematic review aimed to identify remote technologies and assessed their feasibility and acceptability in treating adults with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), acute stress disorder and adjustment disorder (AjD).

Method: The databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, PubMed and the Cochrane Library were screened to identify studies investigating the feasibility and acceptability of remote interventions for PTSD, acute stress disorder and AjD in adults. Studies that obtained poor-quality ratings on critical appraisal tools were excluded. Results were synthesised using a narrative review approach.

Results: In total, there were 74 studies evaluating 27 remote interventions for TSRD: online interventions (k = 47, 63.51%), mobile applications (k = 17, 22.97%), video conferencing (k = 9, 12.16%) and message-based systems (k = 1, 1.35%). Findings from the review showed higher feasibility and acceptability for interventions with an interactive clinician-patient component. Among self-directed interventions, only two applications and eight online interventions provided a clinician component. Most studies targeted PTSD, with few targeting other diagnoses.

Conclusions: Recommendations related to remote interventions for TSRDs should be broadened to include AjD and other underrepresented diagnoses, and tailored to individual patients' profiles, including their ability to sustain engagement and clinical needs, using a stepped-care approach.

成人创伤和应激相关疾病远程治疗技术的可行性和可接受性:混合方法系统评价
背景:创伤和应激相关障碍(TSRD)是一种使人衰弱的精神健康状况。鉴于传统服务的障碍,远程和在线技术越来越多地用于治疗TSRD。目的:本研究旨在识别远程技术,并评估其治疗成人创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、急性应激障碍和适应障碍(AjD)的可行性和可接受性。方法:对MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase、PsycInfo、PubMed、Cochrane Library数据库进行筛选,探讨成人PTSD、急性应激障碍和AjD远程干预的可行性和可接受性。在关键评估工具上获得低质量评级的研究被排除在外。使用叙述性回顾方法对结果进行综合。结果:共有74项研究评估了27种TSRD远程干预措施:在线干预(k = 47, 63.51%)、移动应用(k = 17, 22.97%)、视频会议(k = 9, 12.16%)和基于消息的系统(k = 1, 1.35%)。研究结果表明,临床-患者互动干预具有更高的可行性和可接受性。在自我导向的干预措施中,只有两个应用程序和八个在线干预措施提供了临床医生成分。大多数研究针对创伤后应激障碍,很少针对其他诊断。结论:与tsrd远程干预相关的建议应扩大到包括AjD和其他代表性不足的诊断,并根据个体患者的情况量身定制,包括他们持续参与的能力和临床需求,采用分步护理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信