{"title":"Artificial-Intelligence-based Surgical Phase Recognition in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Cross-Surgeon Validation.","authors":"Yuichiro Konnai, Keishiro Fukumoto, Masashi Takeuchi, Rei Takeuchi, Shinnosuke Fujiwara, Yota Yasumizu, Nobuyuki Tanaka, Toshikazu Takeda, Kazuhiro Matsumoto, Takeo Kosaka, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Yuko Kitagawa, Mototsugu Oya","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-18590-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown potential in various fields; however, its practical application in surgery remains limited. We developed an AI system capable of automatically recognizing surgical phases in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and confirmed its accuracy through cross-surgeon validation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analyzed clinical data from 102 patients who underwent RARP, including 81 consecutive patients operated on by one surgeon (surgeon A) and 21 operated on by five other surgeons (surgeons B-F). In total, 65 of the 81 patients were used for AI development, while the remaining 16, in addition to the 21 patients operated on by surgeons B-F, were used for AI validation. We classified surgical operations into nine phases. Well-trained surgeons annotated the time corresponding to each surgical phase for each video. We used Temporal Convolutional Networks for the Operating Room (TeCNO) to develop the AI model and evaluated its precision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In AI development, 919,231 frames were utilized. Testing involved 216,357 frames from surgeon A and 249,553 frames from surgeons B-F. When the developed AI was used to analyze surgical videos from surgeon A, precision reached 0.94. In contrast, when the AI was applied to videos from surgeons B-F, precision was 0.83.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AI we developed not only showed high accuracy, but also demonstrated generalizability across different surgeons. By comprehensively evaluating surgical videos, our AI may be used to assess the quality of surgeries, thereby providing valuable feedback to surgeons and enhancing the effectiveness of surgical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18590-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown potential in various fields; however, its practical application in surgery remains limited. We developed an AI system capable of automatically recognizing surgical phases in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and confirmed its accuracy through cross-surgeon validation.
Materials and methods: We analyzed clinical data from 102 patients who underwent RARP, including 81 consecutive patients operated on by one surgeon (surgeon A) and 21 operated on by five other surgeons (surgeons B-F). In total, 65 of the 81 patients were used for AI development, while the remaining 16, in addition to the 21 patients operated on by surgeons B-F, were used for AI validation. We classified surgical operations into nine phases. Well-trained surgeons annotated the time corresponding to each surgical phase for each video. We used Temporal Convolutional Networks for the Operating Room (TeCNO) to develop the AI model and evaluated its precision.
Results: In AI development, 919,231 frames were utilized. Testing involved 216,357 frames from surgeon A and 249,553 frames from surgeons B-F. When the developed AI was used to analyze surgical videos from surgeon A, precision reached 0.94. In contrast, when the AI was applied to videos from surgeons B-F, precision was 0.83.
Conclusions: The AI we developed not only showed high accuracy, but also demonstrated generalizability across different surgeons. By comprehensively evaluating surgical videos, our AI may be used to assess the quality of surgeries, thereby providing valuable feedback to surgeons and enhancing the effectiveness of surgical education.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.