Cognitive Reappraisal as a Potential Mechanism of Unified Protocol for Emotional Disorders

IF 4.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Behavior Therapy Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2025.04.005
Mingcong Tang, Laura J. Long, Marie Torre, Daniella Spencer-Laitt, Julián D. Moreno-Villamizar, David H. Barlow, Todd J. Farchione
{"title":"Cognitive Reappraisal as a Potential Mechanism of Unified Protocol for Emotional Disorders","authors":"Mingcong Tang,&nbsp;Laura J. Long,&nbsp;Marie Torre,&nbsp;Daniella Spencer-Laitt,&nbsp;Julián D. Moreno-Villamizar,&nbsp;David H. Barlow,&nbsp;Todd J. Farchione","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2025.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to investigate changes in cognitive reappraisal as a mechanism of the unified protocol (UP) for emotional disorders. Data were collected as part of a larger randomized clinical equivalence trial that assessed the efficacy of the UP, a transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), relative to well-established single-disorder protocols and a wait-list control. The present sample included 132 individuals with primary diagnoses of panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, or obsessive-compulsive disorder who were randomized to either the UP or the control group. They were assessed at five major time points during treatment, as well as a 6- and 12-month follow-up. Measures included the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale for anxiety symptoms, the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale for depression symptoms, and the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire to assess cognitive reappraisal. Multilevel mixed-effects models showed that cognitive reappraisal skills improved significantly over time in the UP group compared to a wait-list control group. Within the UP group, increases in cognitive reappraisal predicted subsequent reductions in anxiety and depression scores at the following time point. The greatest degree of improvement in cognitive reappraisal was observed at the last two time points during treatment, and these gains were sustained across the follow-up period. These findings underscore the importance of cognitive reappraisal, suggesting that it functions as a key transdiagnostic mechanism contributing to the UP’s efficacy in treating emotional disorders. This research highlights the necessity for targeted interventions to enhance reappraisal skills, informing the optimization of the UP for individuals with emotional disorders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":"56 6","pages":"Pages 1055-1067"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789425000425","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate changes in cognitive reappraisal as a mechanism of the unified protocol (UP) for emotional disorders. Data were collected as part of a larger randomized clinical equivalence trial that assessed the efficacy of the UP, a transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), relative to well-established single-disorder protocols and a wait-list control. The present sample included 132 individuals with primary diagnoses of panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, or obsessive-compulsive disorder who were randomized to either the UP or the control group. They were assessed at five major time points during treatment, as well as a 6- and 12-month follow-up. Measures included the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale for anxiety symptoms, the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale for depression symptoms, and the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire to assess cognitive reappraisal. Multilevel mixed-effects models showed that cognitive reappraisal skills improved significantly over time in the UP group compared to a wait-list control group. Within the UP group, increases in cognitive reappraisal predicted subsequent reductions in anxiety and depression scores at the following time point. The greatest degree of improvement in cognitive reappraisal was observed at the last two time points during treatment, and these gains were sustained across the follow-up period. These findings underscore the importance of cognitive reappraisal, suggesting that it functions as a key transdiagnostic mechanism contributing to the UP’s efficacy in treating emotional disorders. This research highlights the necessity for targeted interventions to enhance reappraisal skills, informing the optimization of the UP for individuals with emotional disorders.
认知重评作为情绪障碍统一治疗方案的潜在机制
本研究旨在探讨认知重评价的变化作为统一方案(UP)治疗情绪障碍的机制。数据是作为一项更大的随机临床等效试验的一部分收集的,该试验评估了UP(一种跨诊断认知行为疗法(CBT))相对于成熟的单一疾病治疗方案和等候名单对照的疗效。目前的样本包括132名初步诊断为惊恐障碍、广泛性焦虑障碍、社交焦虑障碍或强迫症的个体,他们被随机分为UP组和对照组。他们在治疗期间的五个主要时间点进行评估,并进行6个月和12个月的随访。测量方法包括焦虑症状的总体焦虑严重程度和损害量表,抑郁症状的总体抑郁严重程度和损害量表,以及评估认知重评的情绪调节问卷。多层混合效应模型显示,与等候名单对照组相比,UP组的认知重新评估技能随着时间的推移显着提高。在UP组中,认知重新评估的增加预示着接下来的时间点焦虑和抑郁评分的降低。在治疗期间的最后两个时间点观察到认知再评估的最大程度的改善,并且这些收益在整个随访期间持续。这些发现强调了认知重评价的重要性,表明它作为一种关键的跨诊断机制,有助于UP治疗情绪障碍的疗效。这项研究强调了有针对性的干预措施的必要性,以提高重新评估技能,为情绪障碍患者的UP优化提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书