Engagement in Ecological Momentary Assessment of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: A Mixed Methods Study

IF 4.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Behavior Therapy Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-29 DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2025.05.007
Molly I. Ball, Nathan S. Fishbein, Narise Ramlal, Nancy Hu, Joseph S. Maimone, Adam Bear, Evan M. Kleiman, Michelle B. Stein, Matthew K. Nock, Kate H. Bentley
{"title":"Engagement in Ecological Momentary Assessment of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: A Mixed Methods Study","authors":"Molly I. Ball,&nbsp;Nathan S. Fishbein,&nbsp;Narise Ramlal,&nbsp;Nancy Hu,&nbsp;Joseph S. Maimone,&nbsp;Adam Bear,&nbsp;Evan M. Kleiman,&nbsp;Michelle B. Stein,&nbsp;Matthew K. Nock,&nbsp;Kate H. Bentley","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2025.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) holds great potential for understanding suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) in real time. However, since the burden of EMA can lower participant engagement, more research is needed to understand how individuals engage with it, particularly during high suicide risk periods. This study aims to better understand participant engagement with EMA using both qualitative and quantitative indices. One hundred adults were enrolled in an EMA study during psychiatric inpatient hospitalization for STBs and completed six brief EMA surveys per day assessing STBs and related factors during hospitalization and for four weeks after. At the end of the study, participants completed a qualitative interview assessing motivations to participate, study perceptions, perspectives on EMA, engagement barriers, and recommendations. Participants completed 14,464 EMA surveys in total, with an average completion rate of 58%. Engagement was higher during hospitalization (66%) than after (54%). In interviews, most found EMA acceptable (59% enjoyed participation), noting that surveys often increased emotional awareness (51%). Some found EMA repetitive or tedious, and only a small minority found it distressing. Primary motivations were financial compensation (73%) and contributing to research (69%). Main barriers were schedules (92%) and momentary distress (60%). Recommendations largely focused on improving EMA administration, such as survey frequency. Most qualitative themes did not significantly differ by EMA engagement, although lower engagers gave more recommendations and had more unique barriers than high engagers. Quantitative and qualitative findings indicate EMA of STBs is generally acceptable during and after psychiatric hospitalization, with important recommendations for improvement. Integrating participant experiences is critical as researchers and clinicians work to optimize EMA with individuals at risk for suicide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":"56 6","pages":"Pages 1143-1155"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789425000498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) holds great potential for understanding suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) in real time. However, since the burden of EMA can lower participant engagement, more research is needed to understand how individuals engage with it, particularly during high suicide risk periods. This study aims to better understand participant engagement with EMA using both qualitative and quantitative indices. One hundred adults were enrolled in an EMA study during psychiatric inpatient hospitalization for STBs and completed six brief EMA surveys per day assessing STBs and related factors during hospitalization and for four weeks after. At the end of the study, participants completed a qualitative interview assessing motivations to participate, study perceptions, perspectives on EMA, engagement barriers, and recommendations. Participants completed 14,464 EMA surveys in total, with an average completion rate of 58%. Engagement was higher during hospitalization (66%) than after (54%). In interviews, most found EMA acceptable (59% enjoyed participation), noting that surveys often increased emotional awareness (51%). Some found EMA repetitive or tedious, and only a small minority found it distressing. Primary motivations were financial compensation (73%) and contributing to research (69%). Main barriers were schedules (92%) and momentary distress (60%). Recommendations largely focused on improving EMA administration, such as survey frequency. Most qualitative themes did not significantly differ by EMA engagement, although lower engagers gave more recommendations and had more unique barriers than high engagers. Quantitative and qualitative findings indicate EMA of STBs is generally acceptable during and after psychiatric hospitalization, with important recommendations for improvement. Integrating participant experiences is critical as researchers and clinicians work to optimize EMA with individuals at risk for suicide.
参与自杀念头和行为的生态瞬间评估:一项混合方法研究
生态瞬间评估(EMA)在实时理解自杀想法和行为(STBs)方面具有巨大的潜力。然而,由于EMA的负担会降低参与者的参与度,因此需要更多的研究来了解个人如何参与其中,特别是在高自杀风险时期。本研究旨在通过定性和定量指标更好地了解参与者对EMA的参与情况。100名成年人在因性传播感染而住院的精神科住院期间参加了一项EMA研究,并在住院期间和住院后4周内每天完成6次简短的EMA调查,评估性传播感染和相关因素。在研究结束时,参与者完成了一个定性访谈,评估参与动机、研究看法、对环境管理的看法、参与障碍和建议。参与者总共完成了14,464份EMA调查,平均完成率为58%。住院期间(66%)的敬业度高于住院后(54%)。在访谈中,大多数人认为EMA是可以接受的(59%的人喜欢参与),并指出调查通常会提高情绪意识(51%)。有些人认为EMA重复或乏味,只有少数人觉得它令人痛苦。主要动机是经济补偿(73%)和为研究做出贡献(69%)。主要障碍是日程安排(92%)和短暂的痛苦(60%)。建议主要集中于改善EMA管理,如调查频率。大多数定性主题没有显著差异,尽管较低的参与给出了更多的建议,并有更多的独特障碍比高的参与。定量和定性研究结果表明,在精神科住院期间和之后,性传播感染的EMA通常是可以接受的,并提出了重要的改进建议。当研究人员和临床医生致力于优化自杀风险个体的EMA时,整合参与者的经验至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书