Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Patients With Transposition of the Great Arteries: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Jessica Victoria Yao BBMed, MD, FRACP , Ximena Cid-Serra MD, FRACP, PhD , Karrar Albadosh MD, FABHS, FGHA , Andrew Browne PhD , Anastasia D. Egorova MD, PhD , Magalie Ladouceur MD, PhD , Craig Broberg MD , Muhammad A. Nizam MD , Paul Khairy MD, PhD, MHI , Gareth J. Padfield BMSc, MBChB, PhD, MRCP , Jeremy P. Moore MD , Geetha Kandavello MBBS, MRCP , Sushma Reddy MD , Gruschen Veldtman MD , Dominica Zentner MBBS, FRACP, PhD
{"title":"Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Patients With Transposition of the Great Arteries: A Systematic Review of the Literature","authors":"Jessica Victoria Yao BBMed, MD, FRACP ,&nbsp;Ximena Cid-Serra MD, FRACP, PhD ,&nbsp;Karrar Albadosh MD, FABHS, FGHA ,&nbsp;Andrew Browne PhD ,&nbsp;Anastasia D. Egorova MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Magalie Ladouceur MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Craig Broberg MD ,&nbsp;Muhammad A. Nizam MD ,&nbsp;Paul Khairy MD, PhD, MHI ,&nbsp;Gareth J. Padfield BMSc, MBChB, PhD, MRCP ,&nbsp;Jeremy P. Moore MD ,&nbsp;Geetha Kandavello MBBS, MRCP ,&nbsp;Sushma Reddy MD ,&nbsp;Gruschen Veldtman MD ,&nbsp;Dominica Zentner MBBS, FRACP, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cjcpc.2025.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with a systemic right ventricle (sRV) due to transposition of the great arteries are known to have a particularly high risk of sudden cardiac death. Current guidelines issue a weak recommendation to consider primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in patients with severe sRV dysfunction. This systematic review aims to ascertain factors that are associated with appropriate ICD therapy in patients with an sRV and primary prevention ICD, so that we can further refine selection criteria for implantation in this population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search of MEDLINE and Embase was performed to identify all studies that explored ICD therapies and associated clinical characteristics in patients with an sRV and primary prevention ICD from the inception of the databases until February 14, 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 11 articles were included in the final analysis. Among those with a primary prevention ICD, 23 (9.1%) had appropriate ICD therapies and 48 (19%) received inappropriate ICD therapies. Among those with appropriate ICD therapies, the most common reason for implantation was sRV dysfunction, followed by nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia on a Holter monitor. Among those with a secondary prevention ICD, 15 (34.9%) received appropriate ICD therapies and 5 (11%) had inappropriate ICD therapies. Most inappropriate therapies were due to atrial tachyarrhythmias.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>sRV dysfunction was the most consistently reported risk factor for appropriate ICD therapy in our review. Effective treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias remains a priority. Larger scale studies are required to develop and validate risk calculation in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100249,"journal":{"name":"CJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease","volume":"4 5","pages":"Pages 249-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772812925000491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with a systemic right ventricle (sRV) due to transposition of the great arteries are known to have a particularly high risk of sudden cardiac death. Current guidelines issue a weak recommendation to consider primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in patients with severe sRV dysfunction. This systematic review aims to ascertain factors that are associated with appropriate ICD therapy in patients with an sRV and primary prevention ICD, so that we can further refine selection criteria for implantation in this population.

Methods

A systematic search of MEDLINE and Embase was performed to identify all studies that explored ICD therapies and associated clinical characteristics in patients with an sRV and primary prevention ICD from the inception of the databases until February 14, 2023.

Results

A total of 11 articles were included in the final analysis. Among those with a primary prevention ICD, 23 (9.1%) had appropriate ICD therapies and 48 (19%) received inappropriate ICD therapies. Among those with appropriate ICD therapies, the most common reason for implantation was sRV dysfunction, followed by nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia on a Holter monitor. Among those with a secondary prevention ICD, 15 (34.9%) received appropriate ICD therapies and 5 (11%) had inappropriate ICD therapies. Most inappropriate therapies were due to atrial tachyarrhythmias.

Conclusions

sRV dysfunction was the most consistently reported risk factor for appropriate ICD therapy in our review. Effective treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias remains a priority. Larger scale studies are required to develop and validate risk calculation in this population.
植入式心律转复除颤器治疗大动脉转位患者:文献系统综述
背景:大动脉转位引起的系统性右心室(sRV)患者发生心源性猝死的风险特别高。目前的指南对严重sRV功能障碍患者考虑一级预防植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入提出了弱建议。本系统综述旨在确定sRV和一级预防ICD患者适当ICD治疗的相关因素,以便我们进一步完善该人群植入术的选择标准。方法对MEDLINE和Embase进行系统检索,以确定从数据库建立到2023年2月14日,所有探索sRV和一级预防ICD患者的ICD治疗和相关临床特征的研究。结果共纳入11篇文章。在一级预防ICD患者中,23人(9.1%)接受了适当的ICD治疗,48人(19%)接受了不适当的ICD治疗。在接受适当ICD治疗的患者中,最常见的植入原因是sRV功能障碍,其次是非持续性室性心动过速和动态心电图显示的室性心动过速。在二级预防ICD患者中,15例(34.9%)接受了适当的ICD治疗,5例(11%)接受了不适当的ICD治疗。大多数不适当的治疗是由于心房性心动过速。结论:在我们的综述中,右心室功能障碍是最一致报道的适宜ICD治疗的危险因素。有效治疗房性心动过速仍然是当务之急。需要更大规模的研究来开发和验证这一人群的风险计算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书