A circular economy approach for the global lithium-ion battery supply chain.

IF 48.5 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Nature Pub Date : 2025-10-22 DOI:10.1038/s41586-025-09617-4
Mengyu Zhai,Yufeng Wu,Shaonan Tian,Haoran Yuan,Bin Li,Xubiao Luo,Guohe Huang,Yupeng Fu,Mengye Zhu,Yifan Gu,Wei Huan,Yu Dai,Huaidong Wang,Liming Yang,Xiaofei Yin,Gongqi Liu,Zhi Li,Jing Gu,Yazhuo Wang,Yong Chen,Tieyong Zuo
{"title":"A circular economy approach for the global lithium-ion battery supply chain.","authors":"Mengyu Zhai,Yufeng Wu,Shaonan Tian,Haoran Yuan,Bin Li,Xubiao Luo,Guohe Huang,Yupeng Fu,Mengye Zhu,Yifan Gu,Wei Huan,Yu Dai,Huaidong Wang,Liming Yang,Xiaofei Yin,Gongqi Liu,Zhi Li,Jing Gu,Yazhuo Wang,Yong Chen,Tieyong Zuo","doi":"10.1038/s41586-025-09617-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lithium-ion battery supply chain is critical for global decarbonization1,2, yet its geographically dispersed production stages pose substantial challenges for carbon management3,4. Here we developed a lithium cycle computable general equilibrium (LCCGE) model, integrating life-cycle thinking with global economic dynamics to systematically assess decarbonization pathways. Our analysis reveals a notable 'value-emission paradox' across the supply chain: downstream cathode production generates 42.56% of economic value from 34.82% of emissions, whereas upstream mining accounts for 38.52% of total emissions from only 18.78% of the value. A comprehensive scenario analysis shows that, although consumer-oriented recycling can reduce global emission intensity by 16.30% in 2060, it is far surpassed by integrated strategies. The highest global emission reduction (35.87%) is achieved by combining cross-regional cooperation on technology and trade with regionally tailored domestic circular economy policies. This synergistic approach proves highly effective in key manufacturing economies, yielding potential emission reductions of 39.14% in the USA, 37.28% in the European Union and 42.35% in China. By revealing the synergy of combining environmental, technological and trade levers through both global collaboration and local adaptation, our work provides a blueprint for decarbonizing complex global supply chains and establishes a framework for analysing their sustainability analysis.","PeriodicalId":18787,"journal":{"name":"Nature","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":48.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09617-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lithium-ion battery supply chain is critical for global decarbonization1,2, yet its geographically dispersed production stages pose substantial challenges for carbon management3,4. Here we developed a lithium cycle computable general equilibrium (LCCGE) model, integrating life-cycle thinking with global economic dynamics to systematically assess decarbonization pathways. Our analysis reveals a notable 'value-emission paradox' across the supply chain: downstream cathode production generates 42.56% of economic value from 34.82% of emissions, whereas upstream mining accounts for 38.52% of total emissions from only 18.78% of the value. A comprehensive scenario analysis shows that, although consumer-oriented recycling can reduce global emission intensity by 16.30% in 2060, it is far surpassed by integrated strategies. The highest global emission reduction (35.87%) is achieved by combining cross-regional cooperation on technology and trade with regionally tailored domestic circular economy policies. This synergistic approach proves highly effective in key manufacturing economies, yielding potential emission reductions of 39.14% in the USA, 37.28% in the European Union and 42.35% in China. By revealing the synergy of combining environmental, technological and trade levers through both global collaboration and local adaptation, our work provides a blueprint for decarbonizing complex global supply chains and establishes a framework for analysing their sustainability analysis.
全球锂离子电池供应链的循环经济方法。
锂离子电池供应链对全球脱碳至关重要1,2,但其地理上分散的生产阶段对碳管理构成了重大挑战3,4。在这里,我们开发了一个锂循环可计算一般平衡(LCCGE)模型,将生命周期思维与全球经济动态相结合,系统地评估了脱碳途径。我们的分析揭示了整个供应链中一个显著的“价值-排放悖论”:下游阴极生产从34.82%的排放量中产生42.56%的经济价值,而上游采矿仅从18.78%的价值中产生38.52%的总排放量。综合情景分析表明,尽管消费者导向的回收利用在2060年可以使全球排放强度降低16.30%,但综合战略远远超过这一水平。通过将跨区域技术和贸易合作与符合区域特点的国内循环经济政策相结合,实现了全球最高的减排(35.87%)。事实证明,这种协同方法在主要制造业经济体中非常有效,美国、欧盟和中国的潜在减排分别为39.14%、37.28%和42.35%。通过揭示通过全球合作和地方适应结合环境、技术和贸易杠杆的协同作用,我们的工作为复杂的全球供应链脱碳提供了蓝图,并建立了分析其可持续性分析的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature
Nature 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
90.00
自引率
1.20%
发文量
3652
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Nature is a prestigious international journal that publishes peer-reviewed research in various scientific and technological fields. The selection of articles is based on criteria such as originality, importance, interdisciplinary relevance, timeliness, accessibility, elegance, and surprising conclusions. In addition to showcasing significant scientific advances, Nature delivers rapid, authoritative, insightful news, and interpretation of current and upcoming trends impacting science, scientists, and the broader public. The journal serves a dual purpose: firstly, to promptly share noteworthy scientific advances and foster discussions among scientists, and secondly, to ensure the swift dissemination of scientific results globally, emphasizing their significance for knowledge, culture, and daily life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信