{"title":"Biomechanical Impact of Partitioning Position and Angle on Post-SPGJ Gastric Emptying.","authors":"Zhenmin Fan,Qiuliang Li,Fengyan Xu,Haiqiao Zhang,Xia Ye,Zhi Zheng,Jun Zhang","doi":"10.1111/nyas.70104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy (SPGJ) improves gastric-outlet obstruction outcomes, yet its biomechanical basis and geometric optimization remain unclear. Patient computed tomography (CT) data were used to reconstruct realistic SPGJ models. Computational fluid dynamics combined with a discrete phase model quantified velocity, wall pressure, particle-retention time, and velocity under systematic variations of partitioning position (distal, mid, and proximal), partitioning angle (5°, 15°, and 25°; left- or right-sided), and incision angle (60°, 75°, and 90°). Distal partitioning produced the lowest pressure drop and fastest emptying, whereas proximal partitioning channeled high-speed flow toward the pylorus and prolonged retention. A ∼15° partitioning angle balanced flow restriction and clearance; extreme unilateral angles either increased particle stasis (left-side) or slowed emptying despite reduced reflux (right-side). A vertical incision (90°) further decreased pressure losses and shortened mean retention relative to oblique cuts. SPGJ biomechanics are highly geometry-sensitive. Distal placement, a 15° partitioning angle, and a near-vertical incision collectively optimize flow, reduce lesion contact, and accelerate gastric emptying, providing quantitative guidance for patient-specific SPGJ design.","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.70104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy (SPGJ) improves gastric-outlet obstruction outcomes, yet its biomechanical basis and geometric optimization remain unclear. Patient computed tomography (CT) data were used to reconstruct realistic SPGJ models. Computational fluid dynamics combined with a discrete phase model quantified velocity, wall pressure, particle-retention time, and velocity under systematic variations of partitioning position (distal, mid, and proximal), partitioning angle (5°, 15°, and 25°; left- or right-sided), and incision angle (60°, 75°, and 90°). Distal partitioning produced the lowest pressure drop and fastest emptying, whereas proximal partitioning channeled high-speed flow toward the pylorus and prolonged retention. A ∼15° partitioning angle balanced flow restriction and clearance; extreme unilateral angles either increased particle stasis (left-side) or slowed emptying despite reduced reflux (right-side). A vertical incision (90°) further decreased pressure losses and shortened mean retention relative to oblique cuts. SPGJ biomechanics are highly geometry-sensitive. Distal placement, a 15° partitioning angle, and a near-vertical incision collectively optimize flow, reduce lesion contact, and accelerate gastric emptying, providing quantitative guidance for patient-specific SPGJ design.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.