Clinical Pharmacology Insights for Small Molecule and Antibody-Based Drug Products Approved for Multiple Immune-Mediated Indications

The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2026-03-06 Epub Date: 2025-10-21 DOI:10.1002/jcph.70121
Yan Xu MD, PhD, Bharath Kumar Kandadi Muralidharan MS, Konstantine Skordos PhD
{"title":"Clinical Pharmacology Insights for Small Molecule and Antibody-Based Drug Products Approved for Multiple Immune-Mediated Indications","authors":"Yan Xu MD, PhD,&nbsp;Bharath Kumar Kandadi Muralidharan MS,&nbsp;Konstantine Skordos PhD","doi":"10.1002/jcph.70121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Developing therapeutics for multiple immune-mediated indications has become a prominent strategy, driven by advances in disease biology, pharmacology, clinical and regulatory science. We analyzed 34 FDA-approved small molecular and antibody-based drug products with more than one adult immune-mediated inflamamatory indication by December 2024. A clear trend toward pathway-driven development was seen, with shared targets (e.g., TNFα, IL-17, IL-23, and JAKs) enabling indication expansion. Approved indications per product ranged from 2 to 8 (median: 3). Over time, the median gap between subsequent indication approvals decreased from 3.2 years (range 1.1–12.8) for products first approved in 1998–2008 to 1.7 years (range 0.67–2.75) for those approved after 2018, reflecting improved efficiency likely due to broader adoption of pathway-based strategies. Route of administration also evolved for antibody-based therapies, with median delays of 5.8–6.0 years for intravenous-to-subcutaneous (IV-to-SC) and 4.4–8.5 years for subcutaneous-to-intravenous (SC-to-IV) transitions. Fewer than 25% of therapies kept the same dosing regimen across indications, with small molecules more likely to retain dosing (62.5%, 5/8) than antibodies (11.5%, 3/26), indicating the need for tailored approaches based on disease context, tissue involvement, and patient characteristics. Key clinical pharmacology considerations include rational dose selection, surrogate and extrapolation strategies, and model-informed bridging, leveraging existing data to inform subsequent indications. Early regulatory engagement, strategic target selection, robust trial design, harmonized safety database, and cross-functional coordination are critical. Our analysis provides insights to guide multi-indication development to improve patient access to therapies for diverse immune-mediated disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"66 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcph.70121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developing therapeutics for multiple immune-mediated indications has become a prominent strategy, driven by advances in disease biology, pharmacology, clinical and regulatory science. We analyzed 34 FDA-approved small molecular and antibody-based drug products with more than one adult immune-mediated inflamamatory indication by December 2024. A clear trend toward pathway-driven development was seen, with shared targets (e.g., TNFα, IL-17, IL-23, and JAKs) enabling indication expansion. Approved indications per product ranged from 2 to 8 (median: 3). Over time, the median gap between subsequent indication approvals decreased from 3.2 years (range 1.1–12.8) for products first approved in 1998–2008 to 1.7 years (range 0.67–2.75) for those approved after 2018, reflecting improved efficiency likely due to broader adoption of pathway-based strategies. Route of administration also evolved for antibody-based therapies, with median delays of 5.8–6.0 years for intravenous-to-subcutaneous (IV-to-SC) and 4.4–8.5 years for subcutaneous-to-intravenous (SC-to-IV) transitions. Fewer than 25% of therapies kept the same dosing regimen across indications, with small molecules more likely to retain dosing (62.5%, 5/8) than antibodies (11.5%, 3/26), indicating the need for tailored approaches based on disease context, tissue involvement, and patient characteristics. Key clinical pharmacology considerations include rational dose selection, surrogate and extrapolation strategies, and model-informed bridging, leveraging existing data to inform subsequent indications. Early regulatory engagement, strategic target selection, robust trial design, harmonized safety database, and cross-functional coordination are critical. Our analysis provides insights to guide multi-indication development to improve patient access to therapies for diverse immune-mediated disorders.

批准用于多种免疫介导适应症的小分子和抗体药物产品的临床药理学见解。
在疾病生物学、药理学、临床和监管科学的推动下,开发针对多种免疫介导适应症的治疗方法已成为一种突出的策略。截至2024年12月,我们分析了34种fda批准的具有一种以上成人免疫介导炎症适应症的小分子和抗体药物。通路驱动发展的明显趋势是,共享靶点(如TNFα、IL-17、IL-23和JAKs)使适应症扩大。每种产品批准的适应症范围从2到8(中位数:3)。随着时间的推移,后续适应症批准之间的中位数差距从1998-2008年首次批准的产品的3.2年(范围1.1-12.8)减少到2018年之后批准的产品的1.7年(范围0.67-2.75),这反映了由于更广泛地采用基于途径的策略可能提高了效率。基于抗体的给药途径也发生了变化,静脉到皮下(iv到sc)的中位延迟为5.8-6.0年,皮下到静脉(sc到iv)的中位延迟为4.4-8.5年。不到25%的治疗方法在不同适应症中保持相同的给药方案,小分子更有可能保持给药方案(62.5%,5/8),而抗体更有可能保持给药方案(11.5%,3/26),这表明需要根据疾病背景、组织累及程度和患者特征定制治疗方案。关键的临床药理学考虑包括合理的剂量选择,替代和外推策略,以及模型信息桥接,利用现有数据为后续适应症提供信息。早期监管参与、战略目标选择、稳健的试验设计、统一的安全数据库和跨职能协调至关重要。我们的分析为指导多适应症的发展提供了见解,以改善患者对各种免疫介导疾病的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书