Consistent hearing aid use in babies (CHerUB): a systematic review and mixed methods synthesis of barriers and facilitators using the theoretical domains framework.
Ciara Kelly, Christopher J Armitage, Sarah Rudman, Ibrahim Almufarrij, Anisa S Visram, Kevin J Munro
{"title":"Consistent hearing aid use in babies (CHerUB): a systematic review and mixed methods synthesis of barriers and facilitators using the theoretical domains framework.","authors":"Ciara Kelly, Christopher J Armitage, Sarah Rudman, Ibrahim Almufarrij, Anisa S Visram, Kevin J Munro","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2573938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Consistent hearing aid use protects against spoken language delays in 0-3-year-olds with hearing loss; however, use is at its lowest and most variable during this critical period for language development. The few intervention efforts to increase infant hearing aid use demonstrate limited effectiveness and lack a theoretically driven understanding of the factors influencing use, potentially inhibiting progress in increasing infant hearing aid use. We aimed to address this gap in understanding by conducting a systematic review and mixed methods synthesis of research reporting parent- and professional-reported barriers and facilitators to hearing aid use in 0-3-year-olds, using framework analysis guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Twenty-seven studies were included, which reported 203 unique barriers and 196 unique facilitators, representing all 14 TDF domains. The most prevalent domains identified were <i>environmental context and resources</i>, <i>knowledge</i>, <i>skills</i>, <i>social influences</i>, and <i>emotion</i>. The determinants of hearing aid use in children aged 0-3 years therefore appear to extend beyond the narrow subset targeted by current interventions (e.g., predominantly <i>knowledge</i> and <i>skills</i>). Interventions would benefit from: (i) targeting a wider range of determinants than existing interventions address; and (ii) applying a theoretically informed framework to guide intervention design.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2025.2573938","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Consistent hearing aid use protects against spoken language delays in 0-3-year-olds with hearing loss; however, use is at its lowest and most variable during this critical period for language development. The few intervention efforts to increase infant hearing aid use demonstrate limited effectiveness and lack a theoretically driven understanding of the factors influencing use, potentially inhibiting progress in increasing infant hearing aid use. We aimed to address this gap in understanding by conducting a systematic review and mixed methods synthesis of research reporting parent- and professional-reported barriers and facilitators to hearing aid use in 0-3-year-olds, using framework analysis guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Twenty-seven studies were included, which reported 203 unique barriers and 196 unique facilitators, representing all 14 TDF domains. The most prevalent domains identified were environmental context and resources, knowledge, skills, social influences, and emotion. The determinants of hearing aid use in children aged 0-3 years therefore appear to extend beyond the narrow subset targeted by current interventions (e.g., predominantly knowledge and skills). Interventions would benefit from: (i) targeting a wider range of determinants than existing interventions address; and (ii) applying a theoretically informed framework to guide intervention design.
期刊介绍:
The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.