Consistent hearing aid use in babies (CHerUB): a systematic review and mixed methods synthesis of barriers and facilitators using the theoretical domains framework.

IF 9.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ciara Kelly, Christopher J Armitage, Sarah Rudman, Ibrahim Almufarrij, Anisa S Visram, Kevin J Munro
{"title":"Consistent hearing aid use in babies (CHerUB): a systematic review and mixed methods synthesis of barriers and facilitators using the theoretical domains framework.","authors":"Ciara Kelly, Christopher J Armitage, Sarah Rudman, Ibrahim Almufarrij, Anisa S Visram, Kevin J Munro","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2573938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Consistent hearing aid use protects against spoken language delays in 0-3-year-olds with hearing loss; however, use is at its lowest and most variable during this critical period for language development. The few intervention efforts to increase infant hearing aid use demonstrate limited effectiveness and lack a theoretically driven understanding of the factors influencing use, potentially inhibiting progress in increasing infant hearing aid use. We aimed to address this gap in understanding by conducting a systematic review and mixed methods synthesis of research reporting parent- and professional-reported barriers and facilitators to hearing aid use in 0-3-year-olds, using framework analysis guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Twenty-seven studies were included, which reported 203 unique barriers and 196 unique facilitators, representing all 14 TDF domains. The most prevalent domains identified were <i>environmental context and resources</i>, <i>knowledge</i>, <i>skills</i>, <i>social influences</i>, and <i>emotion</i>. The determinants of hearing aid use in children aged 0-3 years therefore appear to extend beyond the narrow subset targeted by current interventions (e.g., predominantly <i>knowledge</i> and <i>skills</i>). Interventions would benefit from: (i) targeting a wider range of determinants than existing interventions address; and (ii) applying a theoretically informed framework to guide intervention design.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2025.2573938","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consistent hearing aid use protects against spoken language delays in 0-3-year-olds with hearing loss; however, use is at its lowest and most variable during this critical period for language development. The few intervention efforts to increase infant hearing aid use demonstrate limited effectiveness and lack a theoretically driven understanding of the factors influencing use, potentially inhibiting progress in increasing infant hearing aid use. We aimed to address this gap in understanding by conducting a systematic review and mixed methods synthesis of research reporting parent- and professional-reported barriers and facilitators to hearing aid use in 0-3-year-olds, using framework analysis guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Twenty-seven studies were included, which reported 203 unique barriers and 196 unique facilitators, representing all 14 TDF domains. The most prevalent domains identified were environmental context and resources, knowledge, skills, social influences, and emotion. The determinants of hearing aid use in children aged 0-3 years therefore appear to extend beyond the narrow subset targeted by current interventions (e.g., predominantly knowledge and skills). Interventions would benefit from: (i) targeting a wider range of determinants than existing interventions address; and (ii) applying a theoretically informed framework to guide intervention design.

婴儿助听器的一致性使用(CHerUB):使用理论领域框架对障碍和促进因素的系统回顾和混合方法综合。
持续使用助听器可以防止0-3岁听力损失儿童的口语延迟;然而,在这个语言发展的关键时期,使用率是最低的,也是最多变的。增加婴儿助听器使用的干预措施很少,但效果有限,并且缺乏对影响使用因素的理论驱动理解,这可能会抑制增加婴儿助听器使用的进展。我们的目的是通过对研究报告进行系统回顾和混合方法综合,利用理论领域框架(TDF)指导的框架分析,报告父母和专业人员报告的0-3岁儿童使用助听器的障碍和促进因素,以解决这一理解差距。纳入27项研究,报告了203个独特的障碍和196个独特的促进因子,代表了所有14个TDF域。确定的最普遍的领域是环境背景和资源、知识、技能、社会影响和情感。因此,0-3岁儿童使用助听器的决定因素似乎超出了当前干预措施所针对的狭窄子集(例如,主要是知识和技能)。干预措施将受益于:(i)针对比现有干预措施更广泛的决定因素;(ii)应用理论框架来指导干预设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology Review
Health Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信