Profiling extracellular vesicles from cerebrospinal fluid for classification of intradural spinal tumors.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Amanda Salviano-Silva, Ines Stevic, Christian Mende, Rudolph Reimer, Cecile L Maire, Marius M Mader, Lasse Dührsen, Katrin Lamszus, Manfred Westphal, Sven O Eicker, Franz L Ricklefs
{"title":"Profiling extracellular vesicles from cerebrospinal fluid for classification of intradural spinal tumors.","authors":"Amanda Salviano-Silva, Ines Stevic, Christian Mende, Rudolph Reimer, Cecile L Maire, Marius M Mader, Lasse Dührsen, Katrin Lamszus, Manfred Westphal, Sven O Eicker, Franz L Ricklefs","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-23190-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extracellular vesicles (EVs) transport biomolecules that could serve as biomarkers for disease diagnosis and monitoring. The clinical utility of EVs derived from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with intradural spinal tumors (IST) has not yet been investigated. Here, we obtained EVs from CSF of adult patients with intraspinal ependymoma (n = 9), meningioma (n = 9), hemangioma (n = 4) and schwannian tumors (n = 7), as well as comparison group ('CG', normal pressure hydrocephalus, n = 7), by ultrafiltration. CSF-EVs were characterized by electron microscopy and nanoparticle tracking analysis. EV populations according to the presence of tetraspanins (CD9, CD63, CD81) were measured by imaging flow cytometry (IFCM). CD81<sup>+</sup> EVs were more prevalent in the comparison group, meningioma, ependymoma WHO grade 2, and hemangioma, whereas CD9<sup>+</sup> EVs were predominant in ependymoma grade 1 and Schwannian tumors. CD63<sup>+</sup> EVs per milliliter/CSF differed between ependymoma WHO grades 1 and 2 (FC = 24.6, AUC = 90%, p < 0.05). Based on results from a bead-based multiplex profiling, we selected ITGB1, CD44, CD133 and HLA-DR/DQ/DP for further phenotyping in CSF-EVs using IFCM, in combination with each tetraspanin as double-positive subpopulations. Compared to CG, CD44<sup>+</sup> EVs were the most relevant population in CSF from IST patients, followed by ITGB1. Notable differences in absolute (EVs/mL CSF) and relative (percentages of CSF-EVs) levels were: CD44<sup>+</sup>/CD81<sup>+</sup> for ependymoma grade 1 (FC = 196.5 and 34.5; p < 0.01) and grade 2 (%FC = 6.1, p < 0.05); CD44<sup>+</sup>/CD63<sup>+</sup> for meningioma (abs. and %FC > 1000, p < 0.05); ITGB1<sup>+</sup>/CD81<sup>+</sup> for hemangioma (%FC = 4.8, p < 0.05); and ITGB1<sup>+</sup>/CD9<sup>+</sup> for schwannian tumors (abs.FC = 19.8, p < 0.01). In conclusion, we identified distinct EV subpopulations in the CSF of IST patients, potentially facilitating tumor classification.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"36479"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-23190-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) transport biomolecules that could serve as biomarkers for disease diagnosis and monitoring. The clinical utility of EVs derived from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with intradural spinal tumors (IST) has not yet been investigated. Here, we obtained EVs from CSF of adult patients with intraspinal ependymoma (n = 9), meningioma (n = 9), hemangioma (n = 4) and schwannian tumors (n = 7), as well as comparison group ('CG', normal pressure hydrocephalus, n = 7), by ultrafiltration. CSF-EVs were characterized by electron microscopy and nanoparticle tracking analysis. EV populations according to the presence of tetraspanins (CD9, CD63, CD81) were measured by imaging flow cytometry (IFCM). CD81+ EVs were more prevalent in the comparison group, meningioma, ependymoma WHO grade 2, and hemangioma, whereas CD9+ EVs were predominant in ependymoma grade 1 and Schwannian tumors. CD63+ EVs per milliliter/CSF differed between ependymoma WHO grades 1 and 2 (FC = 24.6, AUC = 90%, p < 0.05). Based on results from a bead-based multiplex profiling, we selected ITGB1, CD44, CD133 and HLA-DR/DQ/DP for further phenotyping in CSF-EVs using IFCM, in combination with each tetraspanin as double-positive subpopulations. Compared to CG, CD44+ EVs were the most relevant population in CSF from IST patients, followed by ITGB1. Notable differences in absolute (EVs/mL CSF) and relative (percentages of CSF-EVs) levels were: CD44+/CD81+ for ependymoma grade 1 (FC = 196.5 and 34.5; p < 0.01) and grade 2 (%FC = 6.1, p < 0.05); CD44+/CD63+ for meningioma (abs. and %FC > 1000, p < 0.05); ITGB1+/CD81+ for hemangioma (%FC = 4.8, p < 0.05); and ITGB1+/CD9+ for schwannian tumors (abs.FC = 19.8, p < 0.01). In conclusion, we identified distinct EV subpopulations in the CSF of IST patients, potentially facilitating tumor classification.

脑脊液细胞外囊泡分析对脊髓硬膜内肿瘤的分类。
细胞外囊泡(EVs)运输生物分子,可作为疾病诊断和监测的生物标志物。脑脊液(CSF)衍生的ev在硬膜内脊髓肿瘤(IST)患者中的临床应用尚未得到研究。本研究采用超滤法从成人椎管内室管膜瘤(n = 9)、脑膜瘤(n = 9)、血管瘤(n = 4)、神经鞘瘤(n = 7)患者脑脊液中提取ev,并与对照组(CG组,常压脑积水,n = 7)进行比较。利用电子显微镜和纳米颗粒跟踪分析对csf - ev进行了表征。通过成像流式细胞术(IFCM)检测四跨蛋白(CD9, CD63, CD81)的存在情况。CD81+ EVs在对照组、脑膜瘤、WHO 2级室管膜瘤和血管瘤中更为普遍,而CD9+ EVs在1级室管膜瘤和许氏瘤中占优势。WHO分级1级和2级室管膜瘤的CD63+ EVs / ml /CSF差异(FC = 24.6, AUC = 90%, p + EVs是IST患者脑脊液中最相关的人群,其次是ITGB1。绝对(ev /mL CSF)和相对(CSF- ev百分比)水平的显著差异为:1级室管膜瘤的CD44+/CD81+ (FC = 196.5和34.5);脑膜瘤的p +/CD63+ (ab .和%FC)为1000,血管瘤的p +/CD81+ (%FC = 4.8),神经鞘瘤的p +/CD9+ (ab .FC = 19.8, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信