The effects of bushfire smoke exposure on oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers: a systematic review.

IF 4.5 4区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Siti Nurshahida Nazli, Gaurav Langan, Sophie Iles, Leron Rathnayake, Dhiya Rampersad, Iyanuoluwa Araba, Peter D Sly, Dwan Vilcins
{"title":"The effects of bushfire smoke exposure on oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers: a systematic review.","authors":"Siti Nurshahida Nazli, Gaurav Langan, Sophie Iles, Leron Rathnayake, Dhiya Rampersad, Iyanuoluwa Araba, Peter D Sly, Dwan Vilcins","doi":"10.1515/reveh-2025-0109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bushfire smoke (BFS) is an escalating global health concern, with increasing bushfire frequency due to climate change. Exposure to BFS significantly impacts public health due to worsening respiratory and cardiovascular conditions, causing increased of hospitalizations and mortality. While BFS exposure is linked to morbidity of these conditions, the underlying biological mechanisms, particularly oxidative stress and inflammation, remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>This systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024554409) synthesized evidence on oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers from BFS exposure. Comprehensive searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were conducted. Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing occupational and non-occupational populations. Risk of bias was assessed using NIH tools, and findings were synthesized narratively due to study heterogeneity. Commonly examined biomarkers included IL-8, IL-6, TNF-<i>α</i>, 8-isoprostane, malondialdehyde (MDA), and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG).</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>IL-8 emerged as the most consistent inflammatory biomarker, with a pooled random-effects analysis of three firefighter studies showing an acute post-shift increase in blood IL-8 (mean difference 9.76 pg/mL, 95 % CI -8.26 to 27.79), though with substantial heterogeneity. Other inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers showed mixed or inconsistent associations with BFS exposure. Small sample sizes, heterogeneous exposure assessment, inconsistent exposure metrics, and unadjusted confounding limited generalizability.</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>This review identifies IL-8 as the most consistent short-term biomarker of BFS exposure in occupational settings but highlights inconsistent evidence for other biomarkers. Future research should use standardized biomarker protocols, larger sample size, longitudinal designs, and include vulnerable populations to clarify biomarker responses to BFS and strengthen the evidence base for public health and occupational safety measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":21165,"journal":{"name":"Reviews on Environmental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews on Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2025-0109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bushfire smoke (BFS) is an escalating global health concern, with increasing bushfire frequency due to climate change. Exposure to BFS significantly impacts public health due to worsening respiratory and cardiovascular conditions, causing increased of hospitalizations and mortality. While BFS exposure is linked to morbidity of these conditions, the underlying biological mechanisms, particularly oxidative stress and inflammation, remain unclear.

Content: This systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024554409) synthesized evidence on oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers from BFS exposure. Comprehensive searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were conducted. Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing occupational and non-occupational populations. Risk of bias was assessed using NIH tools, and findings were synthesized narratively due to study heterogeneity. Commonly examined biomarkers included IL-8, IL-6, TNF-α, 8-isoprostane, malondialdehyde (MDA), and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG).

Summary: IL-8 emerged as the most consistent inflammatory biomarker, with a pooled random-effects analysis of three firefighter studies showing an acute post-shift increase in blood IL-8 (mean difference 9.76 pg/mL, 95 % CI -8.26 to 27.79), though with substantial heterogeneity. Other inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers showed mixed or inconsistent associations with BFS exposure. Small sample sizes, heterogeneous exposure assessment, inconsistent exposure metrics, and unadjusted confounding limited generalizability.

Outlook: This review identifies IL-8 as the most consistent short-term biomarker of BFS exposure in occupational settings but highlights inconsistent evidence for other biomarkers. Future research should use standardized biomarker protocols, larger sample size, longitudinal designs, and include vulnerable populations to clarify biomarker responses to BFS and strengthen the evidence base for public health and occupational safety measures.

森林大火烟雾暴露对氧化应激和炎症生物标志物的影响:系统综述。
导言:森林火灾烟雾(BFS)是一个不断升级的全球健康问题,由于气候变化,森林火灾频率不断增加。由于呼吸和心血管疾病恶化,接触BFS严重影响公众健康,导致住院率和死亡率增加。虽然BFS暴露与这些疾病的发病率有关,但潜在的生物学机制,特别是氧化应激和炎症,仍不清楚。内容:本系统综述(PROSPERO ID: CRD42024554409)综合了BFS暴露中氧化应激和炎症生物标志物的证据。综合检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus和Cochrane Library。14项研究符合纳入标准,包括职业和非职业人群。使用NIH工具评估偏倚风险,由于研究异质性,对结果进行叙述性综合。常用的生物标志物包括IL-8、IL-6、TNF-α、8-异前列腺素、丙二醛(MDA)和8-羟基-2′-脱氧鸟苷(8-OHdG)。总结:IL-8是最一致的炎症生物标志物,对三名消防员的随机效应分析显示,血液IL-8在轮班后急剧升高(平均差异为9.76 pg/mL, 95% % CI -8.26至27.79),尽管存在很大的异质性。其他炎症和氧化应激生物标志物与BFS暴露表现出混合或不一致的关联。小样本量、异质性暴露评估、不一致的暴露度量和未调整的混杂因素限制了通用性。展望:本综述确定IL-8是职业环境中BFS暴露最一致的短期生物标志物,但强调其他生物标志物的证据不一致。未来的研究应采用标准化的生物标志物方案、更大的样本量、纵向设计,并纳入易感人群,以阐明生物标志物对BFS的反应,并加强公共卫生和职业安全措施的证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews on Environmental Health
Reviews on Environmental Health Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Reviews on Environmental Health (REVEH) is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to fill the need for publication of review articles on hot topics in the field of environmental health. Reviews on Environmental Health aims to be an inspiring forum for scientists, environmentalists, physicians, engineers, and students who are concerned with aspects of human health, including quality of life, that are determined by physiological and psychosociological interactions between man and physical, chemical, biological, and social factors in the environment. Reviews on Environmental Health is an important niche served by no other journal, that’s being a site where thoughtful reviews can be published on a variety of subjects related to both health and environment. One challenge is to bridge the research on environmental causes of disease with the clinical practice of medicine. Reviews on Environmental Health is a source of integrated information on environment and health subjects that will be of value to the broad scientific community, whether students, junior and senior professionals, or clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信