Analgesic Efficacy of External Oblique Intercostal Block in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Burhan Dost, Yunus Emre Karapinar, Esra Turunc, Muzeyyen Beldagli, Cengiz Kaya, Yasemin Burcu Ustun, Ersin Koksal, Alessandro De Cassai
{"title":"Analgesic Efficacy of External Oblique Intercostal Block in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Burhan Dost, Yunus Emre Karapinar, Esra Turunc, Muzeyyen Beldagli, Cengiz Kaya, Yasemin Burcu Ustun, Ersin Koksal, Alessandro De Cassai","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-08270-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is associated with significant postoperative pain despite being minimally invasive. External oblique intercostal block (EOIB) has emerged as a novel regional anesthesia technique targeting upper abdominal wall innervation. In this systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA), we aimed to systematically assess the analgesic efficacy of EOIB in patients undergoing LSG, focusing on opioid consumption, pain scores, rescue analgesia use, and recovery outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Web of Science (from inception to until 22 May 2025). The primary outcome was 24-h opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and rescue analgesic use. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four RCTs (n = 249) were included. EOIB significantly reduced 24-h morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption (MD - 12.76 mg; 95% CI - 16.76 to - 8.77; p < 0.001). EOIB also lowered postoperative pain scores and decreased rescue analgesic use (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.09-0.45). PONV incidence was reduced, but not statistically significant. TSA demonstrated that the current evidence is sufficient to confirm a statistically significant effect, with no further trials required.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EOIB appears to be a safe and effective component of multimodal analgesia in LSG, with TSA results supporting the robustness of current evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-08270-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is associated with significant postoperative pain despite being minimally invasive. External oblique intercostal block (EOIB) has emerged as a novel regional anesthesia technique targeting upper abdominal wall innervation. In this systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA), we aimed to systematically assess the analgesic efficacy of EOIB in patients undergoing LSG, focusing on opioid consumption, pain scores, rescue analgesia use, and recovery outcomes.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Web of Science (from inception to until 22 May 2025). The primary outcome was 24-h opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and rescue analgesic use. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.

Results: Four RCTs (n = 249) were included. EOIB significantly reduced 24-h morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption (MD - 12.76 mg; 95% CI - 16.76 to - 8.77; p < 0.001). EOIB also lowered postoperative pain scores and decreased rescue analgesic use (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.09-0.45). PONV incidence was reduced, but not statistically significant. TSA demonstrated that the current evidence is sufficient to confirm a statistically significant effect, with no further trials required.

Conclusions: EOIB appears to be a safe and effective component of multimodal analgesia in LSG, with TSA results supporting the robustness of current evidence.

腹外斜肋间阻滞在腹腔镜袖胃切除术中的镇痛效果:系统回顾和meta分析。
背景:腹腔镜袖胃切除术(LSG)尽管是微创的,但术后疼痛明显。外斜肋间阻滞(EOIB)是一种针对上腹壁神经支配的新型区域麻醉技术。在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们采用试验序贯分析(TSA),旨在系统评估EOIB在LSG患者中的镇痛效果,重点关注阿片类药物的使用、疼痛评分、镇痛救援使用和恢复结果。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central)、Scopus和Web of Science(从成立到2025年5月22日)。主要终点是24小时阿片类药物消耗。次要结局包括疼痛评分、术后恶心呕吐(PONV)和镇痛药物的使用。使用RoB 2评估偏倚风险,使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。结果:纳入4项rct (n = 249)。EOIB显著降低24小时吗啡毫克当量(MME)消耗(MD - 12.76 mg; 95% CI - 16.76至- 8.77;p结论:EOIB似乎是LSG患者多模式镇痛的安全有效成分,TSA结果支持当前证据的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信