{"title":"Pain experiences and pain management among patients with different pain locations in a high-density Asian city.","authors":"Wentao Bai, Hung Chak Ho, Chi Wai Cheung","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2577086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The shift in pain experiences and self-administered management after COVID in high-density Asian cities has not yet been sufficiently researched.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included pain locations with ≥100 respondents from a population-based survey of 3,237 community-dwelling patients in Hong Kong. The prevalence of pain experience and self-administered pain management was estimated. Univariate regressions were used to examine differences in the associations between pain and behavior before and after the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest pain intensity shifted from menstrual/back pain patients to headache/muscle pain patients. Patients with joint/bone, muscle, head, and back pain increasingly stated that they were \"highly affected by daily life.\" Patients with joint, bone, muscle, and head pain had a greater impact on work. The number of patients with joint/bone pain seeking \"help\" from bone setters decreased. In addition, more patients used pain-related health behaviors after COVID-19; however, they also rated the effectiveness of treatment and health behaviors lower. The shifts in prevalence were not due to an increase in perceived pain intensity after COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the difference in pain location, the pain experience after the pandemic shifted negatively. However, self-administered pain management in community-dwelling patients has shifted to informal ways, with fewer appropriate treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2577086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The shift in pain experiences and self-administered management after COVID in high-density Asian cities has not yet been sufficiently researched.
Methods: We included pain locations with ≥100 respondents from a population-based survey of 3,237 community-dwelling patients in Hong Kong. The prevalence of pain experience and self-administered pain management was estimated. Univariate regressions were used to examine differences in the associations between pain and behavior before and after the pandemic.
Results: The highest pain intensity shifted from menstrual/back pain patients to headache/muscle pain patients. Patients with joint/bone, muscle, head, and back pain increasingly stated that they were "highly affected by daily life." Patients with joint, bone, muscle, and head pain had a greater impact on work. The number of patients with joint/bone pain seeking "help" from bone setters decreased. In addition, more patients used pain-related health behaviors after COVID-19; however, they also rated the effectiveness of treatment and health behaviors lower. The shifts in prevalence were not due to an increase in perceived pain intensity after COVID-19.
Conclusion: Despite the difference in pain location, the pain experience after the pandemic shifted negatively. However, self-administered pain management in community-dwelling patients has shifted to informal ways, with fewer appropriate treatments.