Available evidence on integrating COVID-19 into sentinel surveillance systems: A scoping review.

IF 0.8 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jorge Gualotuña-Suntaxi, Diana Pérez-Muñoz, Raynier Zambrano-Villacres, Ana Karina Zambrano, Daniel Simancas-Racines, Jaime Angamarca-Iguago
{"title":"Available evidence on integrating COVID-19 into sentinel surveillance systems: A scoping review.","authors":"Jorge Gualotuña-Suntaxi, Diana Pérez-Muñoz, Raynier Zambrano-Villacres, Ana Karina Zambrano, Daniel Simancas-Racines, Jaime Angamarca-Iguago","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2025.09.3026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the weaknesses of epidemiological surveillance systems and highlighted the need to integrate new respiratory viruses into sentinel surveillance systems. However, current evidence on their effectiveness remains limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This project conducts a scoping review to describe the available evidence on the integration of COVID-19 into sentinel surveillance systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The included studies addressed sentinel surveillance in the context of the pandemic following the World Health Organization declaration. A systematic search was performed in databases including MEDLINE, LILACS, EPISTEMONIKOS, and DIMENSIONS, selecting observational studies and systematic reviews. Data collection and analysis were organized into categories such as clinical characteristics, timely detection, geographic representativeness, co-infection, and adaptability with genomic surveillance. Seventeen studies reporting on COVID-19 integration impact and one preliminary WHO report were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results identified the most prevalent symptoms in the general population: fever (73%), cough (51.8%), loss of taste or smell (45.1%), hypoxemia (33%), and sputum production (23.9%). A high correlation was obtained between SARI cases or hospitalizations due to respiratory infection and the incidence of COVID-19 (ρ = 0.78 and ρ = 0.82 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating COVID-19 into the sentinel surveillance system could improve detection, response, and follow-up capacity. Additionally, implementing standardized case definitions promotes more efficient use of laboratory resources, thereby enhancing the sustainability of the surveillance system.</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"25 9","pages":"e3026"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medwave","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2025.09.3026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the weaknesses of epidemiological surveillance systems and highlighted the need to integrate new respiratory viruses into sentinel surveillance systems. However, current evidence on their effectiveness remains limited.

Aim: This project conducts a scoping review to describe the available evidence on the integration of COVID-19 into sentinel surveillance systems.

Methods: The included studies addressed sentinel surveillance in the context of the pandemic following the World Health Organization declaration. A systematic search was performed in databases including MEDLINE, LILACS, EPISTEMONIKOS, and DIMENSIONS, selecting observational studies and systematic reviews. Data collection and analysis were organized into categories such as clinical characteristics, timely detection, geographic representativeness, co-infection, and adaptability with genomic surveillance. Seventeen studies reporting on COVID-19 integration impact and one preliminary WHO report were identified.

Results: Results identified the most prevalent symptoms in the general population: fever (73%), cough (51.8%), loss of taste or smell (45.1%), hypoxemia (33%), and sputum production (23.9%). A high correlation was obtained between SARI cases or hospitalizations due to respiratory infection and the incidence of COVID-19 (ρ = 0.78 and ρ = 0.82 respectively).

Conclusions: Integrating COVID-19 into the sentinel surveillance system could improve detection, response, and follow-up capacity. Additionally, implementing standardized case definitions promotes more efficient use of laboratory resources, thereby enhancing the sustainability of the surveillance system.

将COVID-19纳入哨点监测系统的现有证据:范围审查
2019冠状病毒病大流行暴露了流行病学监测系统的弱点,凸显了将新型呼吸道病毒纳入哨点监测系统的必要性。然而,目前关于其有效性的证据仍然有限。目的:本项目进行范围审查,以描述将COVID-19纳入哨点监测系统的现有证据。方法:纳入的研究涉及在世界卫生组织宣布大流行后的背景下的哨点监测。在MEDLINE、LILACS、EPISTEMONIKOS和DIMENSIONS等数据库中进行系统检索,选择观察性研究和系统综述。数据收集和分析分为临床特征、及时发现、地理代表性、合并感染以及与基因组监测的适应性等类别。确定了17项报告COVID-19整合影响的研究和一份世卫组织初步报告。结果:结果确定了一般人群中最常见的症状:发烧(73%)、咳嗽(51.8%)、味觉或嗅觉丧失(45.1%)、低氧血症(33%)和多痰(23.9%)。急性呼吸道感染病例或因呼吸道感染住院与COVID-19发病率呈高度相关(ρ = 0.78和ρ = 0.82)。结论:将COVID-19纳入哨点监测系统可以提高发现、应对和随访能力。此外,实施标准化病例定义有助于更有效地利用实验室资源,从而增强监测系统的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medwave
Medwave MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medwave is a peer-reviewed, biomedical and public health journal. Since its foundation in 2001 (Volume 1) it has always been an online only, open access publication that does not charge subscription or reader fees. Since January 2011 (Volume 11, Number 1), all articles are peer-reviewed. Without losing sight of the importance of evidence-based approach and methodological soundness, the journal accepts for publication articles that focus on providing updates for clinical practice, review and analysis articles on topics such as ethics, public health and health policy; clinical, social and economic health determinants; clinical and health research findings from all of the major disciplines of medicine, medical science and public health. The journal does not publish basic science manuscripts or experiments conducted on animals. Until March 2013, Medwave was publishing 11-12 numbers a year. Each issue would be posted on the homepage on day 1 of each month, except for Chile’s summer holiday when the issue would cover two months. Starting from April 2013, Medwave adopted the continuous mode of publication, which means that the copyedited accepted articles are posted on the journal’s homepage as they are ready. They are then collated in the respective issue and included in the Past Issues section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书