Adalimumab in non-infectious uveitis, towards a real-world therapeutic paradigm beyond inflammation control: A multicenter cross-sectional study.

IF 2 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Carmen Antía Rodríguez-Fernández, Lorena Rodriguez-Martínez, Olalla Rodríguez Lemos, Begoña de Domingo, Pere García Bru, Antía Gestoso, Stephanie Romeo, Patricia González-Berdullas, Bahram Bodaghi, Anxo Fernández-Ferreiro
{"title":"Adalimumab in non-infectious uveitis, towards a real-world therapeutic paradigm beyond inflammation control: A multicenter cross-sectional study.","authors":"Carmen Antía Rodríguez-Fernández, Lorena Rodriguez-Martínez, Olalla Rodríguez Lemos, Begoña de Domingo, Pere García Bru, Antía Gestoso, Stephanie Romeo, Patricia González-Berdullas, Bahram Bodaghi, Anxo Fernández-Ferreiro","doi":"10.1186/s12348-025-00529-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: To evaluate the real-world long-term efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) in refractory non-infectious uveitis (NIU), analyzing clinical outcomes, treatment adjustments, and the potential role of ADA trough levels (ADA TL) in therapeutic response. By identifying factors influencing response, our study aims to contribute to a more personalized approach. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in NIU patients receiving ADA for ≥ 6 months. Disease activity was defined using the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria, and patients were categorized as responders (R) or non-responders (NR). The study assessed corticosteroid (CS) and immunosuppressive therapy adjustments, relapse rates, adverse events (AEs), patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), and the relationship between serum ADA TL, anti-drug antibodies (AAA), and clinical response. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients (91 eyes) with a median disease duration of 6.5 years (IQR 3.0–11.5) were included. Anterior uveitis was the most frequent subtype (34.6%), followed by panuveitis (26.9%), posterior (25%) and intermediate uveitis (13.5%). ADA therapy resulted in a significant reduction in systemic CS and c-DMADs. At the study visit, 65.4% of patients achieved complete inflammatory quiescence, with anterior (OR = 0.06, P = 0.009) and posterior uveitis (OR = 0.11, P = 0.04), being associated with a higher likelihood of response. ADA TL and AAA did not correlate with clinical response (median [IQR]: R = 8.5 [3.9–14.8] µg/mL vs. NR = 10.3 [7.9–14.5] µg/mL). AEs were reported by 32.7% of patients, predominantly mild-to-moderate infections, fatigue, and headaches. No significant differences in efficacy, safety, or relapse rates were observed between original ADA and biosimilars. CONCLUSIONS: Original ADA and biosimilars demonstrate long-term effectiveness and safety in NIU, reducing the need for systemic therapy, with comparable effectiveness and safety. PROMs further revealed that improvements in vision-related QoL were primarily driven by general vision perception, underscoring the subjective impact of treatment beyond objective inflammation control. While serum ADA levels were influenced by some clinical variables, they did not correlate with response to treatment. </p>","PeriodicalId":16600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection","volume":"15 1","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12540958/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12348-025-00529-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the real-world long-term efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) in refractory non-infectious uveitis (NIU), analyzing clinical outcomes, treatment adjustments, and the potential role of ADA trough levels (ADA TL) in therapeutic response. By identifying factors influencing response, our study aims to contribute to a more personalized approach. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in NIU patients receiving ADA for ≥ 6 months. Disease activity was defined using the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria, and patients were categorized as responders (R) or non-responders (NR). The study assessed corticosteroid (CS) and immunosuppressive therapy adjustments, relapse rates, adverse events (AEs), patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), and the relationship between serum ADA TL, anti-drug antibodies (AAA), and clinical response. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients (91 eyes) with a median disease duration of 6.5 years (IQR 3.0–11.5) were included. Anterior uveitis was the most frequent subtype (34.6%), followed by panuveitis (26.9%), posterior (25%) and intermediate uveitis (13.5%). ADA therapy resulted in a significant reduction in systemic CS and c-DMADs. At the study visit, 65.4% of patients achieved complete inflammatory quiescence, with anterior (OR = 0.06, P = 0.009) and posterior uveitis (OR = 0.11, P = 0.04), being associated with a higher likelihood of response. ADA TL and AAA did not correlate with clinical response (median [IQR]: R = 8.5 [3.9–14.8] µg/mL vs. NR = 10.3 [7.9–14.5] µg/mL). AEs were reported by 32.7% of patients, predominantly mild-to-moderate infections, fatigue, and headaches. No significant differences in efficacy, safety, or relapse rates were observed between original ADA and biosimilars. CONCLUSIONS: Original ADA and biosimilars demonstrate long-term effectiveness and safety in NIU, reducing the need for systemic therapy, with comparable effectiveness and safety. PROMs further revealed that improvements in vision-related QoL were primarily driven by general vision perception, underscoring the subjective impact of treatment beyond objective inflammation control. While serum ADA levels were influenced by some clinical variables, they did not correlate with response to treatment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

阿达木单抗治疗非感染性葡萄膜炎,超越炎症控制的现实世界治疗范式:一项多中心横断面研究
背景:为了评估阿达木单抗(ADA)治疗难治性非感染性葡萄膜炎(NIU)的长期疗效和安全性,分析临床结果、治疗调整以及ADA谷底水平(ADA TL)在治疗反应中的潜在作用。通过确定影响反应的因素,我们的研究旨在为更个性化的方法做出贡献。方法:对接受ADA治疗≥6个月的NIU患者进行多中心、横断面、观察性研究。使用葡萄膜炎命名标准(SUN)定义疾病活动性,并将患者分为反应者(R)和无反应者(NR)。该研究评估了皮质类固醇(CS)和免疫抑制治疗调整、复发率、不良事件(ae)、患者报告的结局(PROMs),以及血清ADA TL、抗药物抗体(AAA)和临床反应之间的关系。结果:共纳入52例患者(91只眼),中位病程6.5年(IQR 3.0-11.5)。前葡萄膜炎是最常见的亚型(34.6%),其次是全葡萄膜炎(26.9%)、后葡萄膜炎(25%)和中葡萄膜炎(13.5%)。ADA治疗导致系统性CS和c- dmad显著降低。在研究访问中,65.4%的患者实现了完全的炎症静止,前(OR = 0.06, P = 0.009)和后葡萄膜炎(OR = 0.11, P = 0.04)与更高的应答可能性相关。ADA TL和AAA与临床反应无关(中位[IQR]: R = 8.5 [3.9-14.8] μ g/mL, NR = 10.3 [7.9-14.5] μ g/mL)。32.7%的患者报告了ae,主要是轻中度感染、疲劳和头痛。原始ADA和生物仿制药在疗效、安全性或复发率方面没有显著差异。结论:原始ADA和生物仿制药在NIU中显示出长期有效性和安全性,减少了全身治疗的需要,具有相当的有效性和安全性。PROMs进一步显示,视觉相关生活质量的改善主要由一般视觉感知驱动,强调了治疗超出客观炎症控制的主观影响。虽然血清ADA水平受到一些临床变量的影响,但它们与治疗反应无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
39
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书