Respecting the right to refuse: is decision-making capacity disproportionately challenged in patients declining medical care in order to treat?

IF 4.4 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Yekaterina Angelova, Stephanie Cheung, Marie S Thearle, Gregg A Robbins-Welty, Omar Farooq Mirza
{"title":"Respecting the right to refuse: is decision-making capacity disproportionately challenged in patients declining medical care in order to treat?","authors":"Yekaterina Angelova, Stephanie Cheung, Marie S Thearle, Gregg A Robbins-Welty, Omar Farooq Mirza","doi":"10.1136/jme-2025-111141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the proportion of capacity challenges for refusal of care, the risk factors that may trigger challenges to capacity and to consider the implications of challenging capacity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined all psychiatric consults placed for decision-making capacity assessment over a 2-year period in an urban community hospital. Data were collected on the reasons for consultation, patient demographics and whether treatment occurred. Statistical analysis, including χ<sup>2</sup> test for equal proportions, was done to determine whether the proportion of capacity challenges for refusal of care differed from 50%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>122 consults questioning capacity were identified during the 2-year period, of which 112 (91.8%) were placed in the setting of refusal of care. Males were over-represented (68.9%) in the consults placed for capacity assessment compared with the proportion of males in all hospital admissions (48.8%) (p<0.0001). The odds of being treated increased in the cohort of patients who lacked decision-making capacity compared with those who were deemed to have capacity (OR 4.2 (95% CI 1.4 to 10.4); p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that capacity is challenged overwhelmingly in patients declining medical care. When these patients are decentred from decision making, the odds of completing treatment were more than four times higher.</p>","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"662-666"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13638307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2025-111141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the proportion of capacity challenges for refusal of care, the risk factors that may trigger challenges to capacity and to consider the implications of challenging capacity.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined all psychiatric consults placed for decision-making capacity assessment over a 2-year period in an urban community hospital. Data were collected on the reasons for consultation, patient demographics and whether treatment occurred. Statistical analysis, including χ2 test for equal proportions, was done to determine whether the proportion of capacity challenges for refusal of care differed from 50%.

Results: 122 consults questioning capacity were identified during the 2-year period, of which 112 (91.8%) were placed in the setting of refusal of care. Males were over-represented (68.9%) in the consults placed for capacity assessment compared with the proportion of males in all hospital admissions (48.8%) (p<0.0001). The odds of being treated increased in the cohort of patients who lacked decision-making capacity compared with those who were deemed to have capacity (OR 4.2 (95% CI 1.4 to 10.4); p=0.002).

Conclusion: This study shows that capacity is challenged overwhelmingly in patients declining medical care. When these patients are decentred from decision making, the odds of completing treatment were more than four times higher.

尊重拒绝的权利:病人为了治疗而拒绝医疗护理的决策能力是否受到不成比例的挑战?
目的:本研究旨在确定拒绝护理能力挑战的比例,可能引发能力挑战的风险因素,并考虑挑战能力的影响。方法:本回顾性队列研究调查了一家城市社区医院2年内所有接受决策能力评估的精神病患者。收集了有关咨询原因、患者人口统计数据以及是否进行了治疗的数据。采用χ2等比例检验进行统计分析,以确定拒绝护理能力挑战的比例是否与50%不同。结果:2年内共鉴定出122名问诊者的质疑能力,其中112名(91.8%)被置于拒绝护理的环境中。与所有住院患者中男性的比例(48.8%)相比,接受能力评估咨询的男性比例过高(68.9%)(结论:这项研究表明,在病人拒绝接受医疗服务时,能力受到了极大的挑战。当这些患者不参与决策时,完成治疗的几率要高出四倍多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Ethics
Journal of Medical Ethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
164
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Ethics is a leading international journal that reflects the whole field of medical ethics. The journal seeks to promote ethical reflection and conduct in scientific research and medical practice. It features articles on various ethical aspects of health care relevant to health care professionals, members of clinical ethics committees, medical ethics professionals, researchers and bioscientists, policy makers and patients. Subscribers to the Journal of Medical Ethics also receive Medical Humanities journal at no extra cost. JME is the official journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书