Serodiagnosis of amoebic abscess: a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study of kits marketed in Europe.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
E Prétot, M-P Brenier-Pinchart, P Tirard-Collet, F Gabriel, F Touafek, A Marteau, L Delcey, C Amiot, D Dupont, H Fricker-Hidalgo, H Sokol, A Moreno-Sabater, F Grenouillet
{"title":"Serodiagnosis of amoebic abscess: a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study of kits marketed in Europe.","authors":"E Prétot, M-P Brenier-Pinchart, P Tirard-Collet, F Gabriel, F Touafek, A Marteau, L Delcey, C Amiot, D Dupont, H Fricker-Hidalgo, H Sokol, A Moreno-Sabater, F Grenouillet","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00179-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amoebiasis is a cosmopolitan parasitic disease caused by <i>Entamoeba histolytica</i>. The most lethal form is extra-intestinal amoebiasis, mainly manifesting as liver abscesses. Diagnosis is based on clinical, radiological, and biological tests. However, there are currently few serology reagents still available on the European market for <i>in vitro</i> diagnosis, and comparative studies of existing reagents are required. We evaluated the performances of the four currently available reagents, either as standalone tests or in combination. Two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the detection of <i>E. histolytica</i> IgG were assessed: one manufactured by Bordier and the other by NovaTec. Additionally, an indirect hemagglutination technique, ELI.H.A <i>Amoeba</i>, and a latex particle agglutination technique, ELITex Bicolor <i>Amoeba</i>, both produced by ELITech Microbio, were evaluated. A total of 442 serum samples were selected from a shared centralized biobank of seven university hospitals in France. The samples included 79 from patients with amoebic abscess, 13 with amoebic colitis, and 350 from healthy donors and patients with parasitic and non-parasitic diseases, especially liver disease and immune dysfunction. The sensitivity of the four kits ranged from 87.3% to 97.5%, while their specificity ranged from 78.3% to 98.6%. Bordier ELISA demonstrated the highest sensitivity, while ELITex Bicolor <i>Amoeba</i> latex reagent exhibited the highest specificity. The combination of Bordier ELISA and/or ELI.H.A <i>Amoeba</i> for screening, combined with ELITex Bicolor <i>Amoeba</i> for confirmation of positive screening results, yielded the most optimal performance. This study highlights the benefits of large comparative studies of commercial assays to guide clinical microbiologists in their choices.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Amoebiasis caused by <i>Entamoeba histolytica</i> is common in countries with low socio-economic levels. The most lethal form is extraintestinal amoebiasis, mainly liver abscesses, which require rapid and accurate diagnosis. Diagnosis is based on clinical, radiological, and, most importantly, serological tests. Implementing a diagnostic strategy requires both knowledge of how diagnostic tests compare with each other and thorough cross-validation. To help the clinical microbiologist choose a serological reagent, we evaluated the performance of four serological reagents currently available on the European market using a large biobank of sera from seven French university hospitals. In addition to patients with amoebic abscess and healthy donors, our study included many samples from patients with other parasitic and non-parasitic pathologies (liver diseases, immune dysfunctions) in order to study particularly non-specific reactivities.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0017925"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00179-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amoebiasis is a cosmopolitan parasitic disease caused by Entamoeba histolytica. The most lethal form is extra-intestinal amoebiasis, mainly manifesting as liver abscesses. Diagnosis is based on clinical, radiological, and biological tests. However, there are currently few serology reagents still available on the European market for in vitro diagnosis, and comparative studies of existing reagents are required. We evaluated the performances of the four currently available reagents, either as standalone tests or in combination. Two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the detection of E. histolytica IgG were assessed: one manufactured by Bordier and the other by NovaTec. Additionally, an indirect hemagglutination technique, ELI.H.A Amoeba, and a latex particle agglutination technique, ELITex Bicolor Amoeba, both produced by ELITech Microbio, were evaluated. A total of 442 serum samples were selected from a shared centralized biobank of seven university hospitals in France. The samples included 79 from patients with amoebic abscess, 13 with amoebic colitis, and 350 from healthy donors and patients with parasitic and non-parasitic diseases, especially liver disease and immune dysfunction. The sensitivity of the four kits ranged from 87.3% to 97.5%, while their specificity ranged from 78.3% to 98.6%. Bordier ELISA demonstrated the highest sensitivity, while ELITex Bicolor Amoeba latex reagent exhibited the highest specificity. The combination of Bordier ELISA and/or ELI.H.A Amoeba for screening, combined with ELITex Bicolor Amoeba for confirmation of positive screening results, yielded the most optimal performance. This study highlights the benefits of large comparative studies of commercial assays to guide clinical microbiologists in their choices.

Importance: Amoebiasis caused by Entamoeba histolytica is common in countries with low socio-economic levels. The most lethal form is extraintestinal amoebiasis, mainly liver abscesses, which require rapid and accurate diagnosis. Diagnosis is based on clinical, radiological, and, most importantly, serological tests. Implementing a diagnostic strategy requires both knowledge of how diagnostic tests compare with each other and thorough cross-validation. To help the clinical microbiologist choose a serological reagent, we evaluated the performance of four serological reagents currently available on the European market using a large biobank of sera from seven French university hospitals. In addition to patients with amoebic abscess and healthy donors, our study included many samples from patients with other parasitic and non-parasitic pathologies (liver diseases, immune dysfunctions) in order to study particularly non-specific reactivities.

阿米巴脓肿的血清学诊断:欧洲上市试剂盒的回顾性诊断准确性研究。
阿米巴病是由溶组织内阿米巴原虫引起的世界性寄生虫病。最致命的形式是肠外阿米巴病,主要表现为肝脓肿。诊断基于临床、放射学和生物学检查。然而,目前欧洲市场上可供体外诊断的血清学试剂很少,需要对现有试剂进行比较研究。我们评估了目前可用的四种试剂的性能,无论是单独测试还是组合测试。采用两种酶联免疫吸附法(elisa)检测溶组织芽胞杆菌IgG:一种由Bordier生产,另一种由NovaTec生产。此外,我们还对ELITech Microbio公司生产的间接血凝技术(elii . h.a Amoeba)和乳胶颗粒凝集技术(eliex Bicolor Amoeba)进行了评价。共从法国七所大学医院的共享集中式生物库中选择了442份血清样本。样本包括79名阿米巴脓肿患者,13名阿米巴结肠炎患者,350名健康捐赠者和寄生虫病和非寄生虫病患者,特别是肝病和免疫功能障碍患者。4种试剂盒的敏感性为87.3% ~ 97.5%,特异性为78.3% ~ 98.6%。Bordier ELISA的灵敏度最高,ELITex双色阿米巴胶乳试剂的特异性最高。结合Bordier ELISA和/或ELISA . h.a阿米巴进行筛选,结合ELITex Bicolor阿米巴进行阳性筛选结果的确认,效果最优。这项研究强调了商业测定的大型比较研究的好处,以指导临床微生物学家在他们的选择。重要性:溶组织内阿米巴引起的阿米巴病在社会经济水平较低的国家很常见。最致命的形式是肠外阿米巴病,主要是肝脓肿,需要快速准确的诊断。诊断基于临床、放射学和最重要的血清学检查。实施诊断策略既需要了解如何相互比较诊断测试,也需要彻底的交叉验证。为了帮助临床微生物学家选择血清学试剂,我们使用来自七所法国大学医院的大型血清生物库,评估了目前欧洲市场上可用的四种血清学试剂的性能。除了阿米巴脓肿患者和健康供者外,我们的研究还包括许多来自其他寄生虫和非寄生虫疾病(肝脏疾病、免疫功能障碍)患者的样本,以研究非特异性反应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信