Detection of protozoan and helminth parasites in concentrated wet mounts of stool using a deep convolutional neural network.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Blaine A Mathison, Katie Knight, Jill Potts, Ben Black, John F Walker, Falon Markow, Amy Wood, Dustin Bess, Ken Dixon, Brian Cahoon, Weston Hymas, Marc Roger Couturier
{"title":"Detection of protozoan and helminth parasites in concentrated wet mounts of stool using a deep convolutional neural network.","authors":"Blaine A Mathison, Katie Knight, Jill Potts, Ben Black, John F Walker, Falon Markow, Amy Wood, Dustin Bess, Ken Dixon, Brian Cahoon, Weston Hymas, Marc Roger Couturier","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01062-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comprehensive diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasites is largely reliant on traditional stool microscopy, despite gains in molecular diagnostics. Wet-mount examinations remain a significant challenge for traditional microscopy, digital microscopy, and artifical intelligence (AI). We developed and validated a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model that provides highly sensitive detection and presumptive classification of enteric parasites. Twenty-seven different parasites were trained on a CNN model using a wide diversity of 4,049 unique parasite-positive specimens (determined by traditional microscopy) collected in the USA, Europe, Africa, and Asia. Model validation was performed with a unique holdout set. In clinical validation, AI correctly detected 250/265 positive specimens (94.3% agreement) and 94/100 negative specimens (94.0%) before discrepant resolution. AI also detected 169 additional organisms from the validation specimens that were not previously identified. These additional detections underwent further discrepant analysis to adjudicate the results by scan review and microscopy. After resolution and inclusion of newly defined true positives and false positives, the positive agreement was 472/477 (98.6%). Negative agreement was variable by organism, ranging from 91.8% to 100%. A relative limit of detection study was performed comparing AI to three technologists of varying experience using serial dilutions of specimens containing <i>Entamoeba</i>, <i>Ascaris</i>, <i>Trichuris</i>, and hookworm. AI consistently detected more organisms and at lower dilutions of parasites than humans, regardless of the technologist's experience. The use of AI for wet-mount analysis is highly sensitive and detects considerably more organisms than traditional microscopy alone. The use of AI simplifies the parasitology workflow and reduces the reliance on traditional microscopy.IMPORTANCEGastrointestinal parasite ova and parasite (O&P) detection from stools is a manual, labor-intensive method requiring highly trained personnel. This testing has been largely unchanged in 100 years, with the exception of minor improvements in processing and fixation techniques. O&Ps are performed worldwide on millions of stool specimens a year, making any improvements in the process highly impactful. Digital slide imaging and artificial intelligence were recently established tools by our laboratory for improving permanent trichrome stain interpretation. This work builds on that breakthrough and describes the first comprehensive wet-mount AI model development and validation. Improved diagnostic yield, analytical sensitivity, and precision were demonstrated in this work through full clinical laboratory validation studies, including a specimen collection sourced from four continents and a diversity of fixatives and preparation techniques. This work represents the completion of a groundbreaking effort to bring parasite screening into the technological age.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0106225"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01062-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comprehensive diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasites is largely reliant on traditional stool microscopy, despite gains in molecular diagnostics. Wet-mount examinations remain a significant challenge for traditional microscopy, digital microscopy, and artifical intelligence (AI). We developed and validated a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model that provides highly sensitive detection and presumptive classification of enteric parasites. Twenty-seven different parasites were trained on a CNN model using a wide diversity of 4,049 unique parasite-positive specimens (determined by traditional microscopy) collected in the USA, Europe, Africa, and Asia. Model validation was performed with a unique holdout set. In clinical validation, AI correctly detected 250/265 positive specimens (94.3% agreement) and 94/100 negative specimens (94.0%) before discrepant resolution. AI also detected 169 additional organisms from the validation specimens that were not previously identified. These additional detections underwent further discrepant analysis to adjudicate the results by scan review and microscopy. After resolution and inclusion of newly defined true positives and false positives, the positive agreement was 472/477 (98.6%). Negative agreement was variable by organism, ranging from 91.8% to 100%. A relative limit of detection study was performed comparing AI to three technologists of varying experience using serial dilutions of specimens containing Entamoeba, Ascaris, Trichuris, and hookworm. AI consistently detected more organisms and at lower dilutions of parasites than humans, regardless of the technologist's experience. The use of AI for wet-mount analysis is highly sensitive and detects considerably more organisms than traditional microscopy alone. The use of AI simplifies the parasitology workflow and reduces the reliance on traditional microscopy.IMPORTANCEGastrointestinal parasite ova and parasite (O&P) detection from stools is a manual, labor-intensive method requiring highly trained personnel. This testing has been largely unchanged in 100 years, with the exception of minor improvements in processing and fixation techniques. O&Ps are performed worldwide on millions of stool specimens a year, making any improvements in the process highly impactful. Digital slide imaging and artificial intelligence were recently established tools by our laboratory for improving permanent trichrome stain interpretation. This work builds on that breakthrough and describes the first comprehensive wet-mount AI model development and validation. Improved diagnostic yield, analytical sensitivity, and precision were demonstrated in this work through full clinical laboratory validation studies, including a specimen collection sourced from four continents and a diversity of fixatives and preparation techniques. This work represents the completion of a groundbreaking effort to bring parasite screening into the technological age.

用深度卷积神经网络检测浓缩湿粪便中原虫和寄生虫。
胃肠道寄生虫的全面诊断在很大程度上依赖于传统的粪便显微镜,尽管在分子诊断方面有所进展。湿片检查仍然是传统显微镜、数字显微镜和人工智能(AI)面临的重大挑战。我们开发并验证了一种深度卷积神经网络(CNN)模型,该模型提供了高度敏感的肠道寄生虫检测和推定分类。使用在美国、欧洲、非洲和亚洲收集的4,049种独特的寄生虫阳性标本(通过传统显微镜确定),在CNN模型上训练了27种不同的寄生虫。模型验证使用唯一的保留集进行。在临床验证中,人工智能正确检测出250/265例阳性标本(符合率94.3%)和94/100例阴性标本(符合率94.0%),然后才能解决差异。人工智能还从验证标本中发现了169种以前未发现的额外生物。这些额外的检测进行了进一步的差异分析,以裁定结果扫描审查和显微镜。在解决并纳入新定义的真阳性和假阳性后,阳性一致性为472/477(98.6%)。否定一致性因生物体而异,从91.8%到100%不等。通过对含有内阿米巴虫、蛔虫、滴虫和钩虫的标本进行连续稀释,将人工智能与三名经验不同的技术人员进行了相对检测限研究。无论技术人员的经验如何,人工智能始终比人类检测到更多的生物体和较低稀释度的寄生虫。使用人工智能进行湿法分析是高度敏感的,并且比单独使用传统显微镜检测到更多的生物体。人工智能的使用简化了寄生虫学工作流程,减少了对传统显微镜的依赖。从粪便中检测胃肠道寄生虫卵和寄生虫(O&P)是一种人工、劳动密集型的方法,需要训练有素的人员。除了处理和固定技术的微小改进外,这种测试在100年里基本上没有改变。每年在全球范围内对数百万个粪便标本进行o&p,这使得该过程中的任何改进都具有很高的影响力。数字幻灯片成像和人工智能是我们实验室最近建立的工具,用于改善永久三色染色解释。这项工作建立在这一突破的基础上,并描述了第一个全面的湿式人工智能模型开发和验证。通过全面的临床实验室验证研究,包括来自四大洲的标本收集和多种固定剂和制备技术,证明了这项工作提高了诊断率、分析灵敏度和精度。这项工作代表了将寄生虫筛查带入技术时代的开创性努力的完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信