Accuracy and Precision of Wearable-Derived Gait Parameters: How these Affect the Performance of Models for Fall Prediction in the Elderly.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Zeyang Guan, Jinghao Cai, Jiachen Wang, Yibin Li, Rui Song, Damiano Zanotto, Sunil K Agrawal, Huanghe Zhang
{"title":"Accuracy and Precision of Wearable-Derived Gait Parameters: How these Affect the Performance of Models for Fall Prediction in the Elderly.","authors":"Zeyang Guan, Jinghao Cai, Jiachen Wang, Yibin Li, Rui Song, Damiano Zanotto, Sunil K Agrawal, Huanghe Zhang","doi":"10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3623129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wearable sensors are widely used to assess spatiotemporal gait parameters and their variability, which are critical for fall risk prediction. However, the impact of gait analysis accuracy and precision on fall risk prediction remains unexplored. This study collected gait data from 95 older adults using instrumented footwear on an instrumented walkway which is recognized as a system with gold standards during the 6-minute walking test. Participants were classified into fallers and non-fallers based on retrospective fall history (falls in the 6 months prior to completing the experiment), prospective fall occurrence (falls in the subsequent 6 months after completing the experiment), and a combination of both. Gait parameters and their variability were estimated using three algorithms: the conventional foot displacement method and two support vector regression (SVR) techniques. These features were used to develop fall risk prediction models with four machine learning classifiers: logistic regression, decision tree, support vector machine, and artificial neural network. Our findings demonstrate that the accuracy and precision of gait analysis algorithms significantly influences the estimation of gait parameters and their variability, directly impacting fall risk prediction performance. Using a support vector classifier, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for predicting retrospective falls, prospective falls, and either fall type increased from 0.79, 0.84, and 0.77 (conventional method) to 0.85, 0.89, and 0.83 (SVR). These findings show the importance of refining gait analysis accuracy and precision in future studies that aim to use wearable sensors for fall risk assessment in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":13419,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3623129","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wearable sensors are widely used to assess spatiotemporal gait parameters and their variability, which are critical for fall risk prediction. However, the impact of gait analysis accuracy and precision on fall risk prediction remains unexplored. This study collected gait data from 95 older adults using instrumented footwear on an instrumented walkway which is recognized as a system with gold standards during the 6-minute walking test. Participants were classified into fallers and non-fallers based on retrospective fall history (falls in the 6 months prior to completing the experiment), prospective fall occurrence (falls in the subsequent 6 months after completing the experiment), and a combination of both. Gait parameters and their variability were estimated using three algorithms: the conventional foot displacement method and two support vector regression (SVR) techniques. These features were used to develop fall risk prediction models with four machine learning classifiers: logistic regression, decision tree, support vector machine, and artificial neural network. Our findings demonstrate that the accuracy and precision of gait analysis algorithms significantly influences the estimation of gait parameters and their variability, directly impacting fall risk prediction performance. Using a support vector classifier, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for predicting retrospective falls, prospective falls, and either fall type increased from 0.79, 0.84, and 0.77 (conventional method) to 0.85, 0.89, and 0.83 (SVR). These findings show the importance of refining gait analysis accuracy and precision in future studies that aim to use wearable sensors for fall risk assessment in older adults.

可穿戴衍生步态参数的准确性和精度:这些参数如何影响老年人跌倒预测模型的性能。
可穿戴传感器被广泛用于评估时空步态参数及其变异性,这对跌倒风险预测至关重要。然而,步态分析的准确性和精度对跌倒风险预测的影响仍未得到探讨。这项研究收集了95名老年人的步态数据,这些老年人在6分钟的步行测试中使用仪器化的鞋子,这是公认的具有金标准的系统。根据回顾性跌倒史(完成实验前6个月跌倒)、预期跌倒发生情况(完成实验后6个月跌倒)以及两者的结合,将参与者分为跌倒者和非跌倒者。采用常规足部位移法和两种支持向量回归(SVR)技术对步态参数及其变异性进行估计。利用这些特征建立了四种机器学习分类器的跌倒风险预测模型:逻辑回归、决策树、支持向量机和人工神经网络。我们的研究结果表明,步态分析算法的准确性和精度显著影响步态参数及其变异性的估计,直接影响跌倒风险预测的性能。使用支持向量分类器,预测回顾性跌倒、前瞻性跌倒和任何跌倒类型的接受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)值从0.79、0.84和0.77(传统方法)增加到0.85、0.89和0.83 (SVR)。这些发现表明,在未来旨在使用可穿戴传感器评估老年人跌倒风险的研究中,提高步态分析的准确性和精度非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.20%
发文量
479
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitative and neural aspects of biomedical engineering, including functional electrical stimulation, acoustic dynamics, human performance measurement and analysis, nerve stimulation, electromyography, motor control and stimulation; and hardware and software applications for rehabilitation engineering and assistive devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信