A novel bendable suction sheath in flexible ureteroscopy for renal calculi.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of International Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-21 DOI:10.1177/03000605251386570
Jiyu Zhao, Jiajing Wang, Sheng Yang, Jia Liu, Junzhe Xia, Xianen Gu, Jianhua Long
{"title":"A novel bendable suction sheath in flexible ureteroscopy for renal calculi.","authors":"Jiyu Zhao, Jiajing Wang, Sheng Yang, Jia Liu, Junzhe Xia, Xianen Gu, Jianhua Long","doi":"10.1177/03000605251386570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of using a disposable bendable negative pressure suction sheath in combination with a disposable ureteroscope for treating upper urinary tract calculi and to compare it with the conventional ureteral access sheath with a lassoed mesh basket.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from patients with upper urinary tract calculi who underwent flexible ureteroscopy at a tertiary hospital in Beijing between March 2023 and March 2024. The study included two groups: 69 patients were treated with disposable bendable negative pressure suction sheaths (negative pressure group) and 83 with conventional ureteral access sheath combined with lassoed mesh baskets (conventional group). Variables analyzed included operative time, stone-free rate, length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complication rate, and hospitalization cost.ResultThe operative time for the negative pressure group was 119.8 ± 10.4 min, which was longer than that in the conventional group (93.2 ± 9.8 min). The postoperative hemoglobin drop was 5.3 ± 2.2 g/L in the negative pressure group and 4.7 ± 1.2 g/L in the conventional group. The hospitalization cost for the negative pressure group was ¥28,273 ± 5389, which was significantly lower than that for the conventional group (¥30,786.1 ± 4055). The stone-free rate at 1 week postoperatively was 84.1% (58/69) in the negative pressure group, which was significantly higher than that in the conventional group (68.7%). However, there was no statistically significant difference in stone-free rate at 1 month postoperatively between the two groups.ConclusionsThe use of a disposable ureteroscope with a bendable negative pressure suction sheath can improve short-term postoperative stone-free rate. However, this approach may increase surgical complexity, extend operative time, and heighten the risk of intraoperative bleeding. This procedure is recommended to be performed by physicians with extensive experience in flexible ureteroscopy to ensure safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"53 10","pages":"3000605251386570"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251386570","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of using a disposable bendable negative pressure suction sheath in combination with a disposable ureteroscope for treating upper urinary tract calculi and to compare it with the conventional ureteral access sheath with a lassoed mesh basket.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from patients with upper urinary tract calculi who underwent flexible ureteroscopy at a tertiary hospital in Beijing between March 2023 and March 2024. The study included two groups: 69 patients were treated with disposable bendable negative pressure suction sheaths (negative pressure group) and 83 with conventional ureteral access sheath combined with lassoed mesh baskets (conventional group). Variables analyzed included operative time, stone-free rate, length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complication rate, and hospitalization cost.ResultThe operative time for the negative pressure group was 119.8 ± 10.4 min, which was longer than that in the conventional group (93.2 ± 9.8 min). The postoperative hemoglobin drop was 5.3 ± 2.2 g/L in the negative pressure group and 4.7 ± 1.2 g/L in the conventional group. The hospitalization cost for the negative pressure group was ¥28,273 ± 5389, which was significantly lower than that for the conventional group (¥30,786.1 ± 4055). The stone-free rate at 1 week postoperatively was 84.1% (58/69) in the negative pressure group, which was significantly higher than that in the conventional group (68.7%). However, there was no statistically significant difference in stone-free rate at 1 month postoperatively between the two groups.ConclusionsThe use of a disposable ureteroscope with a bendable negative pressure suction sheath can improve short-term postoperative stone-free rate. However, this approach may increase surgical complexity, extend operative time, and heighten the risk of intraoperative bleeding. This procedure is recommended to be performed by physicians with extensive experience in flexible ureteroscopy to ensure safety and efficacy.

一种新型可弯曲输尿管镜治疗肾结石的吸引鞘。
目的评价一次性可弯曲负压吸引鞘联合一次性输尿管镜治疗上尿路结石的临床疗效和成本效益,并与常规输尿管套带网篮输尿管通路鞘进行比较。方法回顾性分析2023年3月至2024年3月在北京某三级医院行输尿管软镜检查的上尿路结石患者的临床资料。研究分为两组:69例患者使用一次性可弯曲负压吸引鞘(负压组),83例患者使用常规输尿管通路鞘联合套索网篮(常规组)。分析的变量包括手术时间、结石清除率、术后住院时间、术后并发症发生率和住院费用。结果负压组手术时间为119.8±10.4 min,明显长于常规组(93.2±9.8 min)。术后负压组血红蛋白下降5.3±2.2 g/L,常规组为4.7±1.2 g/L。负压组住院费用为¥28,273±5389,明显低于常规组(¥30,786.1±4055)。术后1周,负压组结石无结石率为84.1%(58/69),明显高于常规组(68.7%)。但两组术后1个月无结石率差异无统计学意义。结论一次性输尿管镜配合可弯曲负压吸引鞘可提高术后短期结石的清除率。然而,这种方法可能会增加手术复杂性,延长手术时间,并增加术中出血的风险。建议由具有丰富输尿管软性镜检查经验的医生进行,以确保安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信