[Conduction system pacing (CSP) for every patient? : Should CSP replace classical right ventricular and biventricular stimulation?]

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Herz Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-21 DOI:10.1007/s00059-025-05347-5
Jörn Schmitt, Sergio Richter
{"title":"[Conduction system pacing (CSP) for every patient? : Should CSP replace classical right ventricular and biventricular stimulation?]","authors":"Jörn Schmitt, Sergio Richter","doi":"10.1007/s00059-025-05347-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Direct stimulation of the conduction system (conduction system pacing, CSP) can be performed at multiple levels and for different indications. The most physiological option is direct stimulation of the bundle of His, which is technically simpler and possible at the level of the left bundle branch and with more stable electrical parameters. This stimulation results not only in \"nice\" ECG leads but, above all, in a homogeneous, synchronous, physiological contraction pattern, especially of the left ventricle. In many situations there is a direct competition with the established stimulation modalities of the right ventricle in isolated bradycardia and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure. A clear distinction and recommendation in the guidelines are not yet definitive, also due to pending and constantly accumulating data and an evolving portfolio of sheaths and leads from all manufacturers; however, overall there is a clear preference for CSP over right ventricular apical pacing, if possible but this still needs to be confirmed in comparison to CRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12863,"journal":{"name":"Herz","volume":" ","pages":"438-445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12660346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-025-05347-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Direct stimulation of the conduction system (conduction system pacing, CSP) can be performed at multiple levels and for different indications. The most physiological option is direct stimulation of the bundle of His, which is technically simpler and possible at the level of the left bundle branch and with more stable electrical parameters. This stimulation results not only in "nice" ECG leads but, above all, in a homogeneous, synchronous, physiological contraction pattern, especially of the left ventricle. In many situations there is a direct competition with the established stimulation modalities of the right ventricle in isolated bradycardia and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure. A clear distinction and recommendation in the guidelines are not yet definitive, also due to pending and constantly accumulating data and an evolving portfolio of sheaths and leads from all manufacturers; however, overall there is a clear preference for CSP over right ventricular apical pacing, if possible but this still needs to be confirmed in comparison to CRT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

[每个病人的传导系统起搏(CSP) ?CSP是否应该取代经典的右心室和双心室刺激?]
传导系统的直接刺激(传导系统起搏,CSP)可以在多个水平和不同的适应症下进行。最生理的选择是直接刺激His束,这在技术上更简单,可以在左束分支的水平上实现,并且具有更稳定的电参数。这种刺激不仅产生“良好”的心电图导联,而且最重要的是,产生均匀、同步的生理收缩模式,尤其是左心室。在许多情况下,在孤立性心动过缓和心力衰竭的心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)中,与既定的右心室刺激模式存在直接竞争。指南中的明确区分和建议尚未确定,这也是由于待处理和不断积累的数据以及所有制造商不断变化的护套组合和引线;然而,总的来说,如果可能的话,CSP明显优于右室心尖起搏,但这仍需要与CRT进行比较确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Herz
Herz 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
61
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Herz is the high-level journal for further education for all physicians interested in cardiology. The individual issues of the journal each deal with specific topics and comprise review articles in English and German written by competent and esteemed authors. They provide up-to-date and comprehensive information concerning the speciality dealt with in the issue. Due to the fact that all relevant aspects of the pertinent topic of an issue are considered, an overview of the current status and progress in cardiology is presented. Reviews and original articles round off the spectrum of information provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书