Grace J. Goodwin, Jorge Fonseca, Sebastian Mehrzad, Jeffrey L. Cummings, Samantha E. John
{"title":"Classification of AD and bvFTD using neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric variables: a machine learning study","authors":"Grace J. Goodwin, Jorge Fonseca, Sebastian Mehrzad, Jeffrey L. Cummings, Samantha E. John","doi":"10.1002/alz.70782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>Machine learning (ML) is increasingly used for clinical classification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias. Prior studies identified useful diagnostic features for AD and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), though they often lack pathological verification. We applied ML to classify AD and bvFTD autopsy status using initial visit neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>Data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set and Neuropathology Data Set were analyzed using logistic regression, support vector machines, random forest, and artificial neural networks to classify autopsy-confirmed diagnosis based on symptom and cognitive data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Among 1616 participants (AD = 1498, bvFTD = 118), all algorithms achieved high accuracy (80% to 90%) and discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.89 to 0.95). Apathy, disinhibition, and digit-symbol substitution were the most important classification features.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>Findings emphasize the value of specific clinical disease markers to support differential diagnosis of AD and bvFTD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Four ML algorithms were used for the classification of AD and bvFTD.</li>\n \n <li>Neuropsychological subtests and neuropsychiatric symptoms were input features.</li>\n \n <li>Models had high classification accuracy and discrimination.</li>\n \n <li>We identified important and accessible clinical features for classification.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12538632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.70782","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Machine learning (ML) is increasingly used for clinical classification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias. Prior studies identified useful diagnostic features for AD and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), though they often lack pathological verification. We applied ML to classify AD and bvFTD autopsy status using initial visit neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric data.
METHODS
Data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set and Neuropathology Data Set were analyzed using logistic regression, support vector machines, random forest, and artificial neural networks to classify autopsy-confirmed diagnosis based on symptom and cognitive data.
RESULTS
Among 1616 participants (AD = 1498, bvFTD = 118), all algorithms achieved high accuracy (80% to 90%) and discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.89 to 0.95). Apathy, disinhibition, and digit-symbol substitution were the most important classification features.
DISCUSSION
Findings emphasize the value of specific clinical disease markers to support differential diagnosis of AD and bvFTD.
Highlights
Four ML algorithms were used for the classification of AD and bvFTD.
Neuropsychological subtests and neuropsychiatric symptoms were input features.
Models had high classification accuracy and discrimination.
We identified important and accessible clinical features for classification.
期刊介绍:
Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.