Classification of AD and bvFTD using neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric variables: a machine learning study

IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Grace J. Goodwin, Jorge Fonseca, Sebastian Mehrzad, Jeffrey L. Cummings, Samantha E. John
{"title":"Classification of AD and bvFTD using neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric variables: a machine learning study","authors":"Grace J. Goodwin,&nbsp;Jorge Fonseca,&nbsp;Sebastian Mehrzad,&nbsp;Jeffrey L. Cummings,&nbsp;Samantha E. John","doi":"10.1002/alz.70782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>Machine learning (ML) is increasingly used for clinical classification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias. Prior studies identified useful diagnostic features for AD and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), though they often lack pathological verification. We applied ML to classify AD and bvFTD autopsy status using initial visit neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>Data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set and Neuropathology Data Set were analyzed using logistic regression, support vector machines, random forest, and artificial neural networks to classify autopsy-confirmed diagnosis based on symptom and cognitive data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Among 1616 participants (AD = 1498, bvFTD = 118), all algorithms achieved high accuracy (80% to 90%) and discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.89 to 0.95). Apathy, disinhibition, and digit-symbol substitution were the most important classification features.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>Findings emphasize the value of specific clinical disease markers to support differential diagnosis of AD and bvFTD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Four ML algorithms were used for the classification of AD and bvFTD.</li>\n \n <li>Neuropsychological subtests and neuropsychiatric symptoms were input features.</li>\n \n <li>Models had high classification accuracy and discrimination.</li>\n \n <li>We identified important and accessible clinical features for classification.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12538632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.70782","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Machine learning (ML) is increasingly used for clinical classification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias. Prior studies identified useful diagnostic features for AD and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), though they often lack pathological verification. We applied ML to classify AD and bvFTD autopsy status using initial visit neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric data.

METHODS

Data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set and Neuropathology Data Set were analyzed using logistic regression, support vector machines, random forest, and artificial neural networks to classify autopsy-confirmed diagnosis based on symptom and cognitive data.

RESULTS

Among 1616 participants (AD = 1498, bvFTD = 118), all algorithms achieved high accuracy (80% to 90%) and discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.89 to 0.95). Apathy, disinhibition, and digit-symbol substitution were the most important classification features.

DISCUSSION

Findings emphasize the value of specific clinical disease markers to support differential diagnosis of AD and bvFTD.

Highlights

  • Four ML algorithms were used for the classification of AD and bvFTD.
  • Neuropsychological subtests and neuropsychiatric symptoms were input features.
  • Models had high classification accuracy and discrimination.
  • We identified important and accessible clinical features for classification.

Abstract Image

使用神经心理学和神经精神变量的AD和bvFTD分类:一项机器学习研究。
机器学习(ML)越来越多地用于阿尔茨海默病(AD)及相关痴呆的临床分类。先前的研究确定了AD和行为变异性额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)的有用诊断特征,尽管它们通常缺乏病理验证。我们利用初次就诊的神经心理学和神经精神病学数据,应用ML对AD和bvFTD尸检状态进行分类。方法:采用logistic回归、支持向量机、随机森林和人工神经网络等方法,对来自国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心统一数据集和神经病理学数据集的数据进行分析,根据症状和认知数据对尸检确诊进行分类。结果:在1616名受试者(AD = 1498, bvFTD = 118)中,所有算法均获得了较高的准确率(80% ~ 90%)和判别能力(AUC = 0.89 ~ 0.95)。冷漠、去抑制和数字符号替换是最重要的分类特征。讨论:研究结果强调了特定临床疾病标志物对支持AD和bvFTD鉴别诊断的价值。重点:使用4种ML算法对AD和bvFTD进行分类。神经心理亚测试和神经精神症状是输入特征。模型具有较高的分类精度和识别率。我们确定了重要和可获得的临床特征进行分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信