Electric vehicle charging dissonance: Exploring how renters and multi-unit dwelling residents navigate limited charging access

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Isrrah Malabanan , Patrícia Sauri Lavieri , Iderlina Mateo-Babiano , Wahhaj Ahmed , Jonas De Vos
{"title":"Electric vehicle charging dissonance: Exploring how renters and multi-unit dwelling residents navigate limited charging access","authors":"Isrrah Malabanan ,&nbsp;Patrícia Sauri Lavieri ,&nbsp;Iderlina Mateo-Babiano ,&nbsp;Wahhaj Ahmed ,&nbsp;Jonas De Vos","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure distribution primarily relies on early adopter data, overlooking challenges faced by later adopters, such as renters and multi-unit dwelling (MUD) residents, who may have different charging needs. These groups often face limited charging access, leading to a discrepancy between their desired and actual charging behaviours. We introduce the concept of <em>charging dissonance</em> to describe this discrepancy, drawing from the cognitive dissonance theory. This study (1) explores how charging dissonance manifests among renters and MUD residents, (2) examines user responses to this dissonance, and (3) evaluates the effectiveness and impacts of these responses through seven focus groups with current EV owners, prospective EV owners, and non-EV intenders in Greater Melbourne (Australia). Our analysis reveals that, first, charging dissonance often occurs when users cannot charge at home and must deliberately incorporate charging into their schedules. Second, users develop various responses to charging dissonance, including relying on less-preferred non-residential charging options, adopting workarounds like kerbside charging, and adjusting their activity-travel patterns to accommodate charging needs. Third, while some users alleviate dissonance through multitasking, others experience persistent dissonance due to schedule inflexibility. Users also rationalise charging difficulties by demonstrating willingness to adapt their behaviours for overall EV ownership benefits. Furthermore, in some cases, charging dissonance leads to undesired consequences like forgone trips, potentially triggering other travel-related dissonances. These insights underscore the need to streamline charging accessibility at rentals and MUDs and to provide non-residential charging alternatives that minimally disrupt user lifestyles to effectively support underserved groups in the EV transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 104453"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692325003448","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure distribution primarily relies on early adopter data, overlooking challenges faced by later adopters, such as renters and multi-unit dwelling (MUD) residents, who may have different charging needs. These groups often face limited charging access, leading to a discrepancy between their desired and actual charging behaviours. We introduce the concept of charging dissonance to describe this discrepancy, drawing from the cognitive dissonance theory. This study (1) explores how charging dissonance manifests among renters and MUD residents, (2) examines user responses to this dissonance, and (3) evaluates the effectiveness and impacts of these responses through seven focus groups with current EV owners, prospective EV owners, and non-EV intenders in Greater Melbourne (Australia). Our analysis reveals that, first, charging dissonance often occurs when users cannot charge at home and must deliberately incorporate charging into their schedules. Second, users develop various responses to charging dissonance, including relying on less-preferred non-residential charging options, adopting workarounds like kerbside charging, and adjusting their activity-travel patterns to accommodate charging needs. Third, while some users alleviate dissonance through multitasking, others experience persistent dissonance due to schedule inflexibility. Users also rationalise charging difficulties by demonstrating willingness to adapt their behaviours for overall EV ownership benefits. Furthermore, in some cases, charging dissonance leads to undesired consequences like forgone trips, potentially triggering other travel-related dissonances. These insights underscore the need to streamline charging accessibility at rentals and MUDs and to provide non-residential charging alternatives that minimally disrupt user lifestyles to effectively support underserved groups in the EV transition.
电动汽车充电不协调:探索租房者和多单元住宅居民如何导航有限的充电通道
电动汽车(EV)充电基础设施分布主要依赖于早期采用者数据,忽略了后期采用者面临的挑战,例如租房者和多单元住宅(MUD)居民,他们可能有不同的充电需求。这些群体经常面临有限的充电机会,导致他们期望的充电行为与实际的充电行为之间存在差异。我们从认知失调理论中引入了充电失调的概念来描述这种差异。本研究(1)探讨了租房者和MUD居民之间的充电不和谐是如何表现的,(2)检查了用户对这种不和谐的反应,(3)通过七个焦点小组评估了这些反应的有效性和影响,这些小组包括大墨尔本(澳大利亚)的现有电动汽车车主、潜在电动汽车车主和非电动汽车车主。我们的分析表明,首先,当用户不能在家里充电时,充电失调经常发生,必须故意将充电纳入他们的时间表。其次,用户对充电不协调产生了不同的反应,包括依赖于不太受欢迎的非住宅充电选择,采用路边充电等变通方法,以及调整他们的活动-旅行模式以适应充电需求。第三,虽然一些用户通过多任务处理缓解了失调,但另一些用户由于时间安排不灵活而经历了持续的失调。用户还通过表现出愿意调整自己的行为以获得整体电动汽车所有权的利益,来合理化充电困难。此外,在某些情况下,充电失调会导致不希望的后果,比如放弃旅行,潜在地引发其他与旅行相关的失调。这些见解强调了简化租赁和移动设备充电的必要性,并提供非住宅充电替代方案,以最大限度地减少对用户生活方式的干扰,从而在电动汽车转型过程中有效地支持服务不足的群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信