Agreement in quantifying the extension of autoimmune-associated interstitial lung disease using the Goh method

Luis Javier Cajas Santana , Santiago Cuero , Gabriela Guerrero , Mayelin Ceballos , María Carolina Torres , Diana Rocio Gil , Yimy F. Medina , Ana Milena Callejas , Javier Leonardo Galindo , Cesar Riascos , Wilmer Aponte , Diana Ochoa , Jennifer Delgadillo
{"title":"Agreement in quantifying the extension of autoimmune-associated interstitial lung disease using the Goh method","authors":"Luis Javier Cajas Santana ,&nbsp;Santiago Cuero ,&nbsp;Gabriela Guerrero ,&nbsp;Mayelin Ceballos ,&nbsp;María Carolina Torres ,&nbsp;Diana Rocio Gil ,&nbsp;Yimy F. Medina ,&nbsp;Ana Milena Callejas ,&nbsp;Javier Leonardo Galindo ,&nbsp;Cesar Riascos ,&nbsp;Wilmer Aponte ,&nbsp;Diana Ochoa ,&nbsp;Jennifer Delgadillo","doi":"10.1016/j.rcreue.2025.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the leading causes of mortality in autoimmune diseases. The extent of the disease is a determining factor in the prognosis and treatment initiation and monitoring. Quantification using the Goh method is the most commonly used method; however, it is subjective. So far, no studies have evaluated the level of agreement among various readers.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study's objective is to determine the interobserver and intra-observer variability in using ILD quantification among physicians from various specialties and levels of experience.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Images from chest computed tomography of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or systemic sclerosis (SSc) and ILD were collected. The five necessary cuts described by Goh were extracted to be evaluated by pulmonologists, rheumatologists, radiologists, fellows, and a thoracic radiologist (gold standard). The interobserver and intra-observer variability values were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient test or Cohen's Kappa test, depending on the nature of the variable, between each group of medical specialties and in comparison with the gold standard.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventy-nine patients were selected, primarily women, 56% having SSc. A total of 1098 CT scans were performed. The intraclass correlation coefficient was .75 (95% CI: .67–.81), including all nine readers. The best correlation with the gold standard was found among pulmonologists (CCI .83) and rheumatologists (CCI .81). According to severity (more significant or less than 20% extension), the Kappa coefficient was .64 among the nine readers. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the average intra-observer correlation of all readers was .89 (95% CI: .81–.93), and the Kappa coefficient was .82.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Goh method is valuable and highly correlated among a diverse group of specialties that manage ILD, making it a practical tool for assessing the extent of the disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101099,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Reumatología (English Edition)","volume":"32 4","pages":"Pages 368-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Reumatología (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444440525000597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the leading causes of mortality in autoimmune diseases. The extent of the disease is a determining factor in the prognosis and treatment initiation and monitoring. Quantification using the Goh method is the most commonly used method; however, it is subjective. So far, no studies have evaluated the level of agreement among various readers.

Objective

The study's objective is to determine the interobserver and intra-observer variability in using ILD quantification among physicians from various specialties and levels of experience.

Methods

Images from chest computed tomography of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or systemic sclerosis (SSc) and ILD were collected. The five necessary cuts described by Goh were extracted to be evaluated by pulmonologists, rheumatologists, radiologists, fellows, and a thoracic radiologist (gold standard). The interobserver and intra-observer variability values were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient test or Cohen's Kappa test, depending on the nature of the variable, between each group of medical specialties and in comparison with the gold standard.

Results

Seventy-nine patients were selected, primarily women, 56% having SSc. A total of 1098 CT scans were performed. The intraclass correlation coefficient was .75 (95% CI: .67–.81), including all nine readers. The best correlation with the gold standard was found among pulmonologists (CCI .83) and rheumatologists (CCI .81). According to severity (more significant or less than 20% extension), the Kappa coefficient was .64 among the nine readers. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the average intra-observer correlation of all readers was .89 (95% CI: .81–.93), and the Kappa coefficient was .82.

Conclusion

The Goh method is valuable and highly correlated among a diverse group of specialties that manage ILD, making it a practical tool for assessing the extent of the disease.
使用Goh方法量化自身免疫相关间质性肺疾病扩展的一致性
间质性肺疾病(ILD)是导致自身免疫性疾病死亡的主要原因之一。疾病的程度是预后和治疗开始和监测的决定性因素。采用Goh法进行定量是最常用的方法;然而,这是主观的。到目前为止,还没有研究评估不同读者的认同程度。本研究的目的是确定来自不同专业和经验水平的医生在使用ILD量化时的观察者之间和观察者内部的变异性。方法收集类风湿关节炎(RA)、系统性硬化症(SSc)和ILD患者的胸部ct图像。Goh描述的五个必要切口被提取出来,由肺科医生、风湿科医生、放射科医生、研究员和一位胸科放射科医生(金标准)进行评估。根据变量的性质,使用类内相关系数检验或Cohen’s Kappa检验计算每组医学专业之间的观察者间和观察者内变异性值,并与金标准进行比较。结果入选患者79例,以女性为主,56%患有SSc。共进行1098次CT扫描。类内相关系数为。75 (95% ci: 0.67)。81),包括所有9个读者。与金标准相关性最好的是肺科医师(CCI)。83)和风湿病学家(CCI .81)。根据严重程度(扩展更显著或小于20%),Kappa系数为。9位读者中有64位。所有读者平均观察者内相关的类内相关系数为。89 (95% ci: 0.81)。93), Kappa系数为0.82。结论:Goh方法在处理ILD的不同专科中是有价值的,并且高度相关,使其成为评估疾病程度的实用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书