Severe invasive Streptococcus pyogenes infections: A 15-year observational study with molecular characterization of isolates among intensive care adults

Loreto Vidaur , Izaskun Azkarate , Estibaliz Salas , Iñigo Ansa , Diego Vicente , Jordi Rello , Milagrosa Montes
{"title":"Severe invasive Streptococcus pyogenes infections: A 15-year observational study with molecular characterization of isolates among intensive care adults","authors":"Loreto Vidaur ,&nbsp;Izaskun Azkarate ,&nbsp;Estibaliz Salas ,&nbsp;Iñigo Ansa ,&nbsp;Diego Vicente ,&nbsp;Jordi Rello ,&nbsp;Milagrosa Montes","doi":"10.1016/j.jointm.2025.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Improving outcomes among patients with invasive group A <em>Streptococcus pyogenes</em> (iGAS) infections is an unmet clinical need. The main objective of this study was to analyze epidemiological and outcome differences in adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with iGAS infection over a 15-year period and to evaluate the impact of M1uk isolates and clindamycin optimization on patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a single-center observational study conducted at the ICU of Donostia University Hospital, located in Donostia, Spain. The recruitment of all consecutive adult patients admitted to the ICU by iGAS was carried out from January 2010 to May 2024 and divided into three periods: pre-pandemic (January 2010–2019), pandemic (2020–2021), and post-pandemic (May 2022–2024). The main outcome variables were ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and ICU mortality. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 25; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A significance level of <em>P</em> &lt;0.05 was considered for all analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-eight adults were enrolled, with a crude mortality in pre- and post-pandemic periods being 25.5% and 10.0% (<em>P</em>=0.200), respectively. Twenty (29.4%) were respiratory and 29 (41.2%) were soft tissue infections. The incidence had valleys (&lt;1/100,000) in 2020 and 2021 and peaks (&gt;4/100,000 inhabitants) in 2014, 2019, and 2023. Pre-pandemic patients were significantly younger (median: 58.0 <em>vs.</em> 67.5 years, <em>P</em> &lt;0.050), had lower Charlson scores (median: 0 <em>vs.</em> 2, <em>P</em>=0.009), and required more renal replacement therapy (48.9% <em>vs.</em> 15.0%, <em>P</em>=0.013). <em>Emm1</em> type was the most frequent isolated strain, with the M1uk lineage being represented in 6 out of 7 <em>Emm1</em> isolates in post-pandemic period. M1uk-infected patients were older (median: 67.0 <em>vs.</em> 50.0 years, <em>P</em>=0.073) but mortality was similar. Most patients (86.6%) received β-lactams plus clindamycin. Interestingly, time to clindamycin administration was earlier (median: 1 h <em>vs.</em> 24 h; <em>P</em> &lt;0.050) in the post-pandemic period with a 5-fold increase in ICU mortality (5.6% to 26.5%, OR=6.14, 95% CI: 0.74 to 50.85; <em>P</em>=0.090) among those adults who did not receive clindamycin in the emergency department.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The incidence of iGAS infections requiring ICU admission showed no significant increase post-Coronavirus Disease-19 pandemic. The highly toxigenic M1uk strain became predominant, but it was not associated with worse mortality among adult ICU patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of intensive medicine","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 336-343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of intensive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X25000520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Improving outcomes among patients with invasive group A Streptococcus pyogenes (iGAS) infections is an unmet clinical need. The main objective of this study was to analyze epidemiological and outcome differences in adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with iGAS infection over a 15-year period and to evaluate the impact of M1uk isolates and clindamycin optimization on patient outcomes.

Methods

This was a single-center observational study conducted at the ICU of Donostia University Hospital, located in Donostia, Spain. The recruitment of all consecutive adult patients admitted to the ICU by iGAS was carried out from January 2010 to May 2024 and divided into three periods: pre-pandemic (January 2010–2019), pandemic (2020–2021), and post-pandemic (May 2022–2024). The main outcome variables were ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and ICU mortality. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 25; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A significance level of P <0.05 was considered for all analyses.

Results

Sixty-eight adults were enrolled, with a crude mortality in pre- and post-pandemic periods being 25.5% and 10.0% (P=0.200), respectively. Twenty (29.4%) were respiratory and 29 (41.2%) were soft tissue infections. The incidence had valleys (<1/100,000) in 2020 and 2021 and peaks (>4/100,000 inhabitants) in 2014, 2019, and 2023. Pre-pandemic patients were significantly younger (median: 58.0 vs. 67.5 years, P <0.050), had lower Charlson scores (median: 0 vs. 2, P=0.009), and required more renal replacement therapy (48.9% vs. 15.0%, P=0.013). Emm1 type was the most frequent isolated strain, with the M1uk lineage being represented in 6 out of 7 Emm1 isolates in post-pandemic period. M1uk-infected patients were older (median: 67.0 vs. 50.0 years, P=0.073) but mortality was similar. Most patients (86.6%) received β-lactams plus clindamycin. Interestingly, time to clindamycin administration was earlier (median: 1 h vs. 24 h; P <0.050) in the post-pandemic period with a 5-fold increase in ICU mortality (5.6% to 26.5%, OR=6.14, 95% CI: 0.74 to 50.85; P=0.090) among those adults who did not receive clindamycin in the emergency department.

Conclusions

The incidence of iGAS infections requiring ICU admission showed no significant increase post-Coronavirus Disease-19 pandemic. The highly toxigenic M1uk strain became predominant, but it was not associated with worse mortality among adult ICU patients.
严重侵袭性化脓性链球菌感染:重症监护成人分离株分子特征的15年观察性研究
背景:改善侵袭性A组化脓性链球菌(iGAS)感染患者的预后是一个尚未满足的临床需求。本研究的主要目的是分析15年期间iGAS感染入住重症监护病房(ICU)的成人的流行病学和结局差异,并评估M1uk分离株和克林霉素优化对患者结局的影响。方法本研究是在西班牙多诺斯蒂亚大学医院ICU进行的单中心观察性研究。从2010年1月至2024年5月,通过iGAS连续招募所有ICU成年患者,并将其分为三个时期:大流行前(2010年1月- 2019年)、大流行前(2020年- 2021年)和大流行后(2022年5月- 2024年)。主要结局变量为ICU住院时间、住院时间和ICU死亡率。数据分析使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)软件(版本25;SPSS Inc.,芝加哥,伊利诺伊州,美国)。所有分析均考虑P <;0.05的显著性水平。结果纳入68名成人,大流行前和大流行后的粗死亡率分别为25.5%和10.0% (P=0.200)。呼吸道感染20例(29.4%),软组织感染29例(41.2%)。发病率在2020年和2021年出现低谷(1/10万人),在2014年、2019年和2023年出现高峰(4/10万人)。大流行前的患者明显更年轻(中位数:58.0比67.5岁,P <0.050), Charlson评分较低(中位数:0比2,P=0.009),并且需要更多的肾脏替代治疗(48.9%比15.0%,P=0.013)。Emm1型是最常见的分离株,在大流行后时期,7株Emm1分离株中有6株为M1uk谱系。m1uk感染的患者年龄较大(中位数:67.0 vs 50.0岁,P=0.073),但死亡率相似。大多数患者(86.6%)接受β-内酰胺类药物联合克林霉素治疗。有趣的是,大流行后给予克林霉素的时间更早(中位数:1小时对24小时;P <0.050),在急诊科未接受克林霉素治疗的成年人中,ICU死亡率增加了5倍(5.6%至26.5%,OR=6.14, 95% CI: 0.74至50.85;P=0.090)。结论2019冠状病毒病大流行后ICU住院iGAS感染发生率无明显增加。高毒力的M1uk菌株成为优势菌株,但它与ICU成人患者较差的死亡率无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of intensive medicine
Journal of intensive medicine Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信