Videoart in the intensive care unit: A prospective observational study

Tomer Arad , Sabina Kalinchuk , Dina Grinas , Moran Hellerman-Itzhaki , Guy Fishman , Itai Bendavid , Liran Statlender , Ilya Kagan , Pierre Singer
{"title":"Videoart in the intensive care unit: A prospective observational study","authors":"Tomer Arad ,&nbsp;Sabina Kalinchuk ,&nbsp;Dina Grinas ,&nbsp;Moran Hellerman-Itzhaki ,&nbsp;Guy Fishman ,&nbsp;Itai Bendavid ,&nbsp;Liran Statlender ,&nbsp;Ilya Kagan ,&nbsp;Pierre Singer","doi":"10.1016/j.jointm.2025.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study sought to evaluate the role of videoart in decreasing the risk of stress symptoms in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a prospective observational cohort study conducted in a general ICU in which 8 of 18 rooms are equipped with a videoart system. Competent patients who spent at least 48 h in the ICU were asked to complete an Impact of Events Scale (IES) questionnaire during hospitalization and at least 1 year after discharge. Patients were recruited from April 2017 until June 2020, and follow-up phone calls were made from June to August 2021. The primary outcome was an IES score indicative of significant stress symptoms during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were IES scores indicative of significant stress symptoms after discharge and clinical parameters during hospital stay. The cut-off value for high-risk stress symptoms was 26. However, because there is uncertainty in the literature regarding the desired cut-off value, two other values were also analyzed. Outcomes that were found statistically significant were further examined using a logistic regression model for the control of confounders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty-one patients completed the questionnaire during hospital stay and 24 patients after discharge. At home, patients who were exposed to videoart had a marginally lower mean IES score (median=6 [interquartile range: 0–18] <em>vs.</em> median=32 [interquartile range:10–45], <em>P</em> = 0.054) and a significantly lower rate of high-risk stress symptoms using the primary cut-off value (11.8 % <em>vs.</em> 57.1 %, <em>P</em>=0.038; odds ratio=10.00 95 % CI: 1.22 to 81.80, <em>P</em>=0.03). However, statistical significance was lost after adjustment for confounders (odds ratio=12.00, 95 % CI: 0.67 to 222.00, <em>P</em>=0.09) . There was no difference in the mean IES score, significant stress symptoms rate, or in any of the other endpoints examined during the hospital stay.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is a trend toward the beneficial effect of videoart for the alleviation of stress symptoms among ICU patients. However, further study is needed to examine the role of this technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of intensive medicine","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 400-406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of intensive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X25000167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study sought to evaluate the role of videoart in decreasing the risk of stress symptoms in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods

This is a prospective observational cohort study conducted in a general ICU in which 8 of 18 rooms are equipped with a videoart system. Competent patients who spent at least 48 h in the ICU were asked to complete an Impact of Events Scale (IES) questionnaire during hospitalization and at least 1 year after discharge. Patients were recruited from April 2017 until June 2020, and follow-up phone calls were made from June to August 2021. The primary outcome was an IES score indicative of significant stress symptoms during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were IES scores indicative of significant stress symptoms after discharge and clinical parameters during hospital stay. The cut-off value for high-risk stress symptoms was 26. However, because there is uncertainty in the literature regarding the desired cut-off value, two other values were also analyzed. Outcomes that were found statistically significant were further examined using a logistic regression model for the control of confounders.

Results

Eighty-one patients completed the questionnaire during hospital stay and 24 patients after discharge. At home, patients who were exposed to videoart had a marginally lower mean IES score (median=6 [interquartile range: 0–18] vs. median=32 [interquartile range:10–45], P = 0.054) and a significantly lower rate of high-risk stress symptoms using the primary cut-off value (11.8 % vs. 57.1 %, P=0.038; odds ratio=10.00 95 % CI: 1.22 to 81.80, P=0.03). However, statistical significance was lost after adjustment for confounders (odds ratio=12.00, 95 % CI: 0.67 to 222.00, P=0.09) . There was no difference in the mean IES score, significant stress symptoms rate, or in any of the other endpoints examined during the hospital stay.

Conclusions

There is a trend toward the beneficial effect of videoart for the alleviation of stress symptoms among ICU patients. However, further study is needed to examine the role of this technology.
录像艺术在重症监护病房:一项前瞻性观察研究
背景:本研究旨在评估视频治疗在降低重症监护病房(ICU)住院患者压力症状风险中的作用。方法:这是一项在普通ICU进行的前瞻性观察队列研究,其中18个房间中有8个配备了视频艺术系统。在ICU住院至少48小时的合格患者被要求在住院期间和出院后至少1年完成事件影响量表(IES)问卷调查。2017年4月至2020年6月招募患者,2021年6月至8月进行随访电话随访。主要结局是住院期间显著应激症状的IES评分。次要结局是显示出院后显著应激症状的IES评分和住院期间的临床参数。高危应激症状的临界值为26。然而,由于文献中关于期望的截止值存在不确定性,因此还分析了另外两个值。发现有统计学意义的结果进一步使用控制混杂因素的逻辑回归模型进行检查。结果81例患者住院期间完成问卷调查,24例出院后完成问卷调查。在家中,接触视频艺术的患者平均IES评分略低(中位数=6[四分位数范围:0-18]对中位数=32[四分位数范围:10-45],P= 0.054),使用主要临界值,高危应激症状发生率显著降低(11.8 %对57.1 %,P=0.038;比值比=10.00 95 % CI: 1.22至81.80,P=0.03)。然而,校正混杂因素后,没有统计学意义(优势比=12.00,95 % CI: 0.67 ~ 222.00, P=0.09)。在平均IES评分、显著的应激症状率或住院期间检查的任何其他终点方面没有差异。结论视频辅助治疗对缓解ICU患者的应激症状有良好的效果。然而,还需要进一步的研究来检验这项技术的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of intensive medicine
Journal of intensive medicine Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信