Exploring Australian landholders' readiness to restore coastal wetlands: Motivations, challenges and opportunities for blue carbon projects on private land

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
A. Rifaee Rasheed , Romy Greiner , Micheli D.P. Costa , Peter I. Macreadie , Melissa Wartman
{"title":"Exploring Australian landholders' readiness to restore coastal wetlands: Motivations, challenges and opportunities for blue carbon projects on private land","authors":"A. Rifaee Rasheed ,&nbsp;Romy Greiner ,&nbsp;Micheli D.P. Costa ,&nbsp;Peter I. Macreadie ,&nbsp;Melissa Wartman","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coastal wetlands—such as mangroves and saltmarshes are vital global carbon sinks. In Australia, many of these wetlands are concentrated on private lands, but are in decline due to land clearing for urban development and agriculture. One opportunity to safeguard these ecosystems is through voluntary coastal wetland restoration. However, little is known about landholder's interest in recovering such wetlands. We conducted a survey with coastal landholders across Australia to explore their readiness to restore coastal wetlands, and their motivations and challenges to engage in restoration policy measures such as blue carbon projects on their properties. Using Exploratory Factor Analyses we identified key drivers of landholder readiness, followed by a cluster analysis to segment landholders based on their levels of readiness and shared characteristics. We found that motivations were largely shaped by stewardship and environmental values, including climate change outcomes. Barriers included limited technical knowledge on restoration, financial uncertainty, and concerns about project contracts and regulatory complexity. The cluster analysis revealed three landholder groups: ‘Eco-stewards’, ‘Optimists’, and ‘Reluctant adopters’. Eco-stewards were motivated by legacy and environmental values, showing strong interest in restoration, and blue carbon projects with minimal demand for financial assistance. “Optimists” valued both environmental and economic benefits but are likely to require more technical and administrative support. “Reluctant adopters” prioritised land autonomy and profitability and showed the least interest in adopting blue carbon projects. Our findings highlight that flexible programs with tailored support, and simplified project pathways are important to promote wide scale coastal wetland restoration projects in Australia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"395 ","pages":"Article 127650"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725036266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coastal wetlands—such as mangroves and saltmarshes are vital global carbon sinks. In Australia, many of these wetlands are concentrated on private lands, but are in decline due to land clearing for urban development and agriculture. One opportunity to safeguard these ecosystems is through voluntary coastal wetland restoration. However, little is known about landholder's interest in recovering such wetlands. We conducted a survey with coastal landholders across Australia to explore their readiness to restore coastal wetlands, and their motivations and challenges to engage in restoration policy measures such as blue carbon projects on their properties. Using Exploratory Factor Analyses we identified key drivers of landholder readiness, followed by a cluster analysis to segment landholders based on their levels of readiness and shared characteristics. We found that motivations were largely shaped by stewardship and environmental values, including climate change outcomes. Barriers included limited technical knowledge on restoration, financial uncertainty, and concerns about project contracts and regulatory complexity. The cluster analysis revealed three landholder groups: ‘Eco-stewards’, ‘Optimists’, and ‘Reluctant adopters’. Eco-stewards were motivated by legacy and environmental values, showing strong interest in restoration, and blue carbon projects with minimal demand for financial assistance. “Optimists” valued both environmental and economic benefits but are likely to require more technical and administrative support. “Reluctant adopters” prioritised land autonomy and profitability and showed the least interest in adopting blue carbon projects. Our findings highlight that flexible programs with tailored support, and simplified project pathways are important to promote wide scale coastal wetland restoration projects in Australia.
探讨澳大利亚土地所有者恢复沿海湿地的意愿:私人土地上蓝碳项目的动机、挑战和机遇
沿海湿地——比如红树林和盐沼——是至关重要的全球碳汇。在澳大利亚,许多这样的湿地集中在私人土地上,但由于城市发展和农业的土地清理,这些湿地正在减少。保护这些生态系统的一个机会是通过自愿的沿海湿地恢复。然而,很少有人知道土地所有者对恢复这些湿地的兴趣。我们对澳大利亚各地的沿海土地所有者进行了一项调查,以探讨他们恢复沿海湿地的准备情况,以及他们参与恢复政策措施(如蓝碳项目)的动机和挑战。利用探索性因素分析,我们确定了土地所有者准备的关键驱动因素,然后进行聚类分析,根据土地所有者的准备程度和共同特征对其进行细分。我们发现,这些动机在很大程度上受到管理和环境价值观(包括气候变化结果)的影响。障碍包括有限的修复技术知识、财务不确定性、对项目合同和管理复杂性的担忧。聚类分析揭示了三个土地所有者群体:“生态管家”、“乐观主义者”和“不情愿的采用者”。生态管理人员受到遗产和环境价值的激励,对恢复和对财政援助需求最小的蓝碳项目表现出强烈的兴趣。“乐观主义者”重视环境和经济效益,但可能需要更多的技术和行政支持。“不情愿采用者”优先考虑土地自主权和盈利能力,对采用蓝碳项目表现出最不感兴趣。我们的研究结果强调,灵活的方案,量身定制的支持和简化的项目路径对于促进澳大利亚大规模的沿海湿地恢复项目至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信