Low-carbon investment volatility under policy uncertainty: Evidence from equity markets and implications for carbon capture deployment

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Dapeng Lin , Yanfen Wang , Chang Wang , Wen Jiang , Liyuan Zhang , Shuo Hu , Kai Du , Chengdong Yuan
{"title":"Low-carbon investment volatility under policy uncertainty: Evidence from equity markets and implications for carbon capture deployment","authors":"Dapeng Lin ,&nbsp;Yanfen Wang ,&nbsp;Chang Wang ,&nbsp;Wen Jiang ,&nbsp;Liyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Shuo Hu ,&nbsp;Kai Du ,&nbsp;Chengdong Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Policy uncertainty can destabilize investments in carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) by heightening market volatility. However, the impact of climate policy uncertainty (CPU) on emerging low-carbon financial markets remains insufficiently understood, particularly across different countries. To address this gap, we conduct the first cross-country analysis of how CPU and general economic policy uncertainty (EPU) affect CCUS-related equity volatility in China, the United States, and Russia. Using GARCH-X and EGARCH-X volatility models with CPU and EPU indices as exogenous variables, we find that elevated policy uncertainty—whether climate- or economy-related—significantly increases volatility in CCUS equity returns. Moreover, our EGARCH-X results reveal an asymmetric leverage effect: upward spikes in policy uncertainty trigger disproportionately larger volatility surges than equivalent declines in uncertainty reduce volatility. This positive uncertainty–volatility relationship is evident in all three countries. We also observe that EPU shocks generally exert a stronger impact on CCUS market volatility than CPU shocks, except in China where climate-policy signals are especially potent amid active decarbonization efforts. These findings provide novel empirical evidence linking policy uncertainty to CCUS investment risk and quantify its effect on financing conditions. By filling a crucial gap in literature, our study underscores the importance of stable, credible policy frameworks for reducing the cost of capital in low-carbon technology deployment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"531 ","pages":"Article 146882"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625022383","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy uncertainty can destabilize investments in carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) by heightening market volatility. However, the impact of climate policy uncertainty (CPU) on emerging low-carbon financial markets remains insufficiently understood, particularly across different countries. To address this gap, we conduct the first cross-country analysis of how CPU and general economic policy uncertainty (EPU) affect CCUS-related equity volatility in China, the United States, and Russia. Using GARCH-X and EGARCH-X volatility models with CPU and EPU indices as exogenous variables, we find that elevated policy uncertainty—whether climate- or economy-related—significantly increases volatility in CCUS equity returns. Moreover, our EGARCH-X results reveal an asymmetric leverage effect: upward spikes in policy uncertainty trigger disproportionately larger volatility surges than equivalent declines in uncertainty reduce volatility. This positive uncertainty–volatility relationship is evident in all three countries. We also observe that EPU shocks generally exert a stronger impact on CCUS market volatility than CPU shocks, except in China where climate-policy signals are especially potent amid active decarbonization efforts. These findings provide novel empirical evidence linking policy uncertainty to CCUS investment risk and quantify its effect on financing conditions. By filling a crucial gap in literature, our study underscores the importance of stable, credible policy frameworks for reducing the cost of capital in low-carbon technology deployment.

Abstract Image

政策不确定性下的低碳投资波动:来自股票市场的证据及其对碳捕集部署的影响
政策不确定性会加剧市场波动,从而破坏碳捕集、利用和封存(CCUS)投资的稳定。然而,气候政策不确定性(CPU)对新兴低碳金融市场的影响仍未得到充分认识,特别是在不同国家之间。为了解决这一差距,我们对中国、美国和俄罗斯的CPU和一般经济政策不确定性(EPU)如何影响ccus相关的股票波动进行了首次跨国分析。使用GARCH-X和EGARCH-X波动性模型,将CPU和EPU指数作为外生变量,我们发现政策不确定性的升高(无论是与气候还是经济相关)显著增加了CCUS股票回报的波动性。此外,我们的EGARCH-X结果揭示了一种不对称杠杆效应:政策不确定性的上升会引发不成比例的波动性激增,而不确定性的下降会减少波动性。这种正的不确定性-波动性关系在这三个国家都很明显。我们还观察到,EPU冲击通常比CPU冲击对CCUS市场波动的影响更大,但在积极脱碳努力中气候政策信号特别强烈的中国除外。这些发现为政策不确定性与CCUS投资风险之间的联系提供了新的实证证据,并量化了其对融资条件的影响。通过填补文献中的一个关键空白,我们的研究强调了稳定、可信的政策框架对于降低低碳技术部署的资本成本的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信