Digital platform ecosystems: A systemic view of power wielded by the platform orchestrators over complementors

IF 7.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Industrial Marketing Management Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.10.001
Cristina Simone, Antonio Laudando, Silvia Scardini
{"title":"Digital platform ecosystems: A systemic view of power wielded by the platform orchestrators over complementors","authors":"Cristina Simone,&nbsp;Antonio Laudando,&nbsp;Silvia Scardini","doi":"10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the rising shaped-by-platforms landscape, increasing power has been concentrated in the hands of a few dominant digital platform orchestrators. This growing dominance has brought the issue of power asymmetries between platform orchestrators and complementors to the forefront of economic and managerial literature. Although most studies attribute the dominant position of platform orchestrators primarily to their economic power, it represents only one source of a broader multidimensional power. This study unveils a critical literature gap: the lack of systemic frameworks enlightening the multiple sources of the platform orchestrators' power. The research addresses this gap, adopting the systems thinking perspective that enables to enrich literature in two ways: first, to move beyond a monolithic definition of the platform orchestrator's power by identifying three different sources from which it emerges (economic, technological and regulatory); and second, to integrate the static view of platform orchestrators' power by enlightening how each source affects the other according to recursive interdependent feedback loops. The originality of this work is double: 1) it provides an insightful taxonomy of the three main sources of the platform orchestrator's power; 2) it develops a 3 × 3 matrix shedding light on the interdependences and feedback loops among the three sources of power.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51345,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Marketing Management","volume":"131 ","pages":"Pages 31-45"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Marketing Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850125001361","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the rising shaped-by-platforms landscape, increasing power has been concentrated in the hands of a few dominant digital platform orchestrators. This growing dominance has brought the issue of power asymmetries between platform orchestrators and complementors to the forefront of economic and managerial literature. Although most studies attribute the dominant position of platform orchestrators primarily to their economic power, it represents only one source of a broader multidimensional power. This study unveils a critical literature gap: the lack of systemic frameworks enlightening the multiple sources of the platform orchestrators' power. The research addresses this gap, adopting the systems thinking perspective that enables to enrich literature in two ways: first, to move beyond a monolithic definition of the platform orchestrator's power by identifying three different sources from which it emerges (economic, technological and regulatory); and second, to integrate the static view of platform orchestrators' power by enlightening how each source affects the other according to recursive interdependent feedback loops. The originality of this work is double: 1) it provides an insightful taxonomy of the three main sources of the platform orchestrator's power; 2) it develops a 3 × 3 matrix shedding light on the interdependences and feedback loops among the three sources of power.
数字平台生态系统:对平台协调者凌驾于互补者之上的权力的系统看法
在由平台塑造的格局中,越来越多的权力集中在少数占主导地位的数字平台协调者手中。这种日益增长的主导地位,已将平台协调者与互补者之间的权力不对称问题推到了经济和管理文献的前沿。尽管大多数研究将平台协调者的主导地位主要归因于他们的经济实力,但它只代表了更广泛的多维权力的一个来源。这项研究揭示了一个关键的文献缺口:缺乏系统的框架来启发平台协调者权力的多种来源。该研究解决了这一差距,采用了系统思考的视角,可以从两个方面丰富文献:首先,通过确定平台协调者的权力产生的三个不同来源(经济、技术和监管),超越了对平台协调者权力的单一定义;第二,通过揭示每个源如何根据递归的相互依赖的反馈循环影响其他源,来整合平台编排器力量的静态视图。这项工作的原创性是双重的:1)它提供了平台编排者权力的三个主要来源的深刻分类;2)建立了一个3 × 3矩阵,揭示了三种电源之间的相互依赖关系和反馈回路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
20.40%
发文量
255
期刊介绍: Industrial Marketing Management delivers theoretical, empirical, and case-based research tailored to the requirements of marketing scholars and practitioners engaged in industrial and business-to-business markets. With an editorial review board comprising prominent international scholars and practitioners, the journal ensures a harmonious blend of theory and practical applications in all articles. Scholars from North America, Europe, Australia/New Zealand, Asia, and various global regions contribute the latest findings to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of industrial markets. This holistic approach keeps readers informed with the most timely data and contemporary insights essential for informed marketing decisions and strategies in global industrial and business-to-business markets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书