A systematic review of the safe routes to school program: A 10-principle policy effectiveness framework for future investments

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Meng Yuan, Alireza Ermagun
{"title":"A systematic review of the safe routes to school program: A 10-principle policy effectiveness framework for future investments","authors":"Meng Yuan,&nbsp;Alireza Ermagun","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With more than a decade of investment and an effective treatment endorsed by Safe Routes to School (SRTS) researchers, the United States is still experiencing alarming trends in obesity, walking and biking to school, and school-transport-related crashes. Childhood obesity rates continue to climb, walking and biking to school are declining, and school-transport-related crashes remain a significant concern. This national trend questions the effectiveness of investment in SRTS projects. This study conducts a comprehensive review of 55 research articles evaluating the effectiveness of the SRTS program in the United States through a policy effectiveness framework. Three findings are discerned. First, the existing literature focuses predominantly on studying the relationship between SRTS projects and the rate of active travel to school, and less on investigating pedestrian and cyclist injury and risks, as well as the funding allocation of the projects. Second, the number of research studies evaluating the effectiveness of SRTS projects is disproportionately higher in California, Texas, Florida, and New York. Third, despite the valuable insights offered by the existing research literature, it is evident that the overall effectiveness of the SRTS program on a national level falls short of expectations. This might be due to (i) the instability of program support and effectiveness, (ii) the lack of a reliable and sustainable assessment system, (iii) inadequate evaluation of co-benefits, and (iv) the absence of a consistent feedback obligation. Future initiatives and investments are urged to (a) support testing, studies, and evaluations on a local scale before implementation at the national scale, (b) prioritize the development and implementation of a uniform and mandatory evaluation system from the beginning, and (c) implement a mandatory feedback system from project implementors and users.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103846"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25003890","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With more than a decade of investment and an effective treatment endorsed by Safe Routes to School (SRTS) researchers, the United States is still experiencing alarming trends in obesity, walking and biking to school, and school-transport-related crashes. Childhood obesity rates continue to climb, walking and biking to school are declining, and school-transport-related crashes remain a significant concern. This national trend questions the effectiveness of investment in SRTS projects. This study conducts a comprehensive review of 55 research articles evaluating the effectiveness of the SRTS program in the United States through a policy effectiveness framework. Three findings are discerned. First, the existing literature focuses predominantly on studying the relationship between SRTS projects and the rate of active travel to school, and less on investigating pedestrian and cyclist injury and risks, as well as the funding allocation of the projects. Second, the number of research studies evaluating the effectiveness of SRTS projects is disproportionately higher in California, Texas, Florida, and New York. Third, despite the valuable insights offered by the existing research literature, it is evident that the overall effectiveness of the SRTS program on a national level falls short of expectations. This might be due to (i) the instability of program support and effectiveness, (ii) the lack of a reliable and sustainable assessment system, (iii) inadequate evaluation of co-benefits, and (iv) the absence of a consistent feedback obligation. Future initiatives and investments are urged to (a) support testing, studies, and evaluations on a local scale before implementation at the national scale, (b) prioritize the development and implementation of a uniform and mandatory evaluation system from the beginning, and (c) implement a mandatory feedback system from project implementors and users.
对安全上学路线项目的系统审查:未来投资的10项政策有效性框架
尽管经过十多年的投资和安全上学路线(SRTS)研究人员认可的有效治疗方法,美国在肥胖、步行和骑自行车上学以及与学校交通有关的交通事故方面仍有令人担忧的趋势。儿童肥胖率继续攀升,步行和骑自行车上学的人数正在下降,与学校交通有关的撞车事故仍然是一个重大问题。这种全国性的趋势对SRTS项目投资的有效性提出了质疑。本研究通过政策有效性框架对55篇评估美国SRTS计划有效性的研究文章进行了全面的回顾。可以看出三个发现。首先,现有文献主要侧重于研究SRTS项目与主动上学率之间的关系,而较少调查行人和骑自行车者的伤害和风险,以及项目的资金分配。其次,在加州、德克萨斯州、佛罗里达州和纽约州,评估SRTS项目有效性的研究数量不成比例地高。第三,尽管现有的研究文献提供了有价值的见解,但很明显,SRTS计划在国家层面的总体有效性低于预期。这可能是由于(i)项目支持和有效性的不稳定性,(ii)缺乏可靠和可持续的评估系统,(iii)对共同效益的评估不足,以及(iv)缺乏一致的反馈义务。敦促未来的倡议和投资:(a)在全国范围内实施之前,在地方范围内支持测试、研究和评估;(b)从一开始就优先考虑统一和强制性评估系统的开发和实施;(c)实施项目实施者和用户的强制性反馈系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信