Coordinating connected practices: A social practice perspective on sustainable commuting

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Live Bøyum , Dale Southerton , Torvald Tangeland
{"title":"Coordinating connected practices: A social practice perspective on sustainable commuting","authors":"Live Bøyum ,&nbsp;Dale Southerton ,&nbsp;Torvald Tangeland","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The reliance on cars for everyday mobility creates a significant barrier to reducing transport emissions, and existing policy measures have been inadequate in promoting sufficient sustainable private mobility. Drawing on social practice theory, and with parallels to the concept of trip chaining, this article argues that the gap between current policy measures and sustainable mobility stems from neglecting the coordination of connected practices. Using survey data on commuting practices in Oslo, designed to focus on practice connections, we employ logistic regression analysis to identify connections between commuting and other everyday practices. Our findings reveal that commuting practices are positioned within a nexus of coordinated practices embedded in material and spatial-temporal arrangements. Specifically, commuting practices connected with shopping, childcare, and leisure activities foster car dependencies. Material and spatial-temporal arrangements of different work practices foster car dependency for the work commute: those working shift hours, that needed to transport work equipment, and who had work tasks across multiple geographical locations were more dependent on commuting by car. The results suggest that car commuting offers greater scope for negotiating the coordination of connected practices. We discuss the implications of our findings for policy approaches for sustainable mobility, arguing that cross-sectoral policy initiatives focused on the ways in which practice connections are coordinated are necessary.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 103855"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25003981","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reliance on cars for everyday mobility creates a significant barrier to reducing transport emissions, and existing policy measures have been inadequate in promoting sufficient sustainable private mobility. Drawing on social practice theory, and with parallels to the concept of trip chaining, this article argues that the gap between current policy measures and sustainable mobility stems from neglecting the coordination of connected practices. Using survey data on commuting practices in Oslo, designed to focus on practice connections, we employ logistic regression analysis to identify connections between commuting and other everyday practices. Our findings reveal that commuting practices are positioned within a nexus of coordinated practices embedded in material and spatial-temporal arrangements. Specifically, commuting practices connected with shopping, childcare, and leisure activities foster car dependencies. Material and spatial-temporal arrangements of different work practices foster car dependency for the work commute: those working shift hours, that needed to transport work equipment, and who had work tasks across multiple geographical locations were more dependent on commuting by car. The results suggest that car commuting offers greater scope for negotiating the coordination of connected practices. We discuss the implications of our findings for policy approaches for sustainable mobility, arguing that cross-sectoral policy initiatives focused on the ways in which practice connections are coordinated are necessary.
协调相关实践:可持续通勤的社会实践视角
日常出行对汽车的依赖对减少交通排放造成了重大障碍,现有的政策措施在促进足够的可持续私人出行方面是不够的。本文借鉴社会实践理论,结合出行链的概念,认为当前政策措施与可持续流动性之间的差距源于忽视了相关实践的协调。利用奥斯陆通勤实践的调查数据,我们采用逻辑回归分析来确定通勤与其他日常实践之间的联系。我们的研究结果表明,通勤实践位于嵌入在物质和时空安排中的协调实践的联系中。具体来说,与购物、照顾孩子和休闲活动相关的通勤习惯培养了对汽车的依赖。不同工作实践的物质和时空安排促进了上下班对汽车的依赖:那些工作时间倒班、需要运输工作设备、工作任务跨越多个地理位置的人更依赖于开车上下班。结果表明,汽车通勤为协商协调互联实践提供了更大的空间。我们讨论了我们的研究结果对可持续交通政策方法的影响,认为有必要采取跨部门政策举措,重点关注协调实践联系的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信