Advancing model evaluation protocol for gas release risk in energy transition

IF 5.5 0 ENERGY & FUELS
Gas Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jgsce.2025.205793
Hui Hu , Yihan Fang , Bin Zhang
{"title":"Advancing model evaluation protocol for gas release risk in energy transition","authors":"Hui Hu ,&nbsp;Yihan Fang ,&nbsp;Bin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jgsce.2025.205793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The coupling of fossil fuel-based hydrogen production with Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) technology represents an effective low-carbon emission approach for hydrogen production. The use of predictive models can more efficiently capture potential hydrogen and CO<sub>2</sub> leakage risks. However, the validation procedure within the current Model Evaluation Protocol (MEP) remains unclear. This study aims to improve the validation procedure by proposing a refined sampling-based method for evaluating gas dispersion models. A point-wise concentration sampling framework is introduced to enhance the consistency and reliability of Statistical Performance Measure (SPM) calculations. The method is applied to evaluate the predicted performance of five models under hydrogen and CO<sub>2</sub> dispersion. The results show that the PHAST model exhibits broader applicability to both gases, while the C-SAT model performs best for hydrogen. In contrast, other models all exhibit significant deviations. Statistical analysis indicates that this method leads to SPM values more closely approaching the ideal range. The results demonstrate that the proposed sampling method can refine or standardize the existing MEP, facilitating the correct evaluation of the gas dispersion models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100568,"journal":{"name":"Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 205793"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949908925002572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coupling of fossil fuel-based hydrogen production with Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) technology represents an effective low-carbon emission approach for hydrogen production. The use of predictive models can more efficiently capture potential hydrogen and CO2 leakage risks. However, the validation procedure within the current Model Evaluation Protocol (MEP) remains unclear. This study aims to improve the validation procedure by proposing a refined sampling-based method for evaluating gas dispersion models. A point-wise concentration sampling framework is introduced to enhance the consistency and reliability of Statistical Performance Measure (SPM) calculations. The method is applied to evaluate the predicted performance of five models under hydrogen and CO2 dispersion. The results show that the PHAST model exhibits broader applicability to both gases, while the C-SAT model performs best for hydrogen. In contrast, other models all exhibit significant deviations. Statistical analysis indicates that this method leads to SPM values more closely approaching the ideal range. The results demonstrate that the proposed sampling method can refine or standardize the existing MEP, facilitating the correct evaluation of the gas dispersion models.
提出了能源转换过程中气体释放风险的模型评价方案
基于化石燃料的制氢与碳捕集、利用和封存(CCUS)技术的耦合是一种有效的低碳制氢方法。使用预测模型可以更有效地捕获潜在的氢气和二氧化碳泄漏风险。然而,目前的模型评估协议(MEP)中的验证程序仍然不清楚。本研究旨在通过提出一种改进的基于采样的方法来评估气体分散模型,从而改进验证程序。为了提高统计性能度量(SPM)计算的一致性和可靠性,引入了逐点浓度采样框架。应用该方法对五种模型在氢气和二氧化碳分散下的预测性能进行了评价。结果表明,PHAST模型对两种气体具有更广泛的适用性,而C-SAT模型对氢气的适用性最好。相比之下,其他模型均表现出明显的偏差。统计分析表明,该方法使SPM值更接近理想范围。结果表明,所提出的采样方法可以完善或规范现有的MEP,促进对气体分散模型的正确评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书