Influence of rebar configuration and steel liner detailing on the local impact response of reinforced concrete panels

IF 6.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Junhwi Ye , Hyukjun Ahn , Yongjae Yu , Jae-Yeol Cho
{"title":"Influence of rebar configuration and steel liner detailing on the local impact response of reinforced concrete panels","authors":"Junhwi Ye ,&nbsp;Hyukjun Ahn ,&nbsp;Yongjae Yu ,&nbsp;Jae-Yeol Cho","doi":"10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite growing interest in impact-resistant structures, including those used in nuclear power plants (NPPs), previous studies are limited in number and are often conducted under experimental conditions that deviate from actual construction practices. Although NPP structures typically incorporate dense steel reinforcement, the role of reinforcing steel in enhancing impact resistance has often been overlooked. The combined influence of rebar detailing and welded steel liner systems—both integral to real-world NPP construction—has not been systematically investigated, leaving a critical gap in understanding their combined contribution under impact loading. To address this gap, this study presents a comprehensive experimental and numerical investigation of the impact resistance of reinforced concrete panels with varying rebar detailing and rear steel liners. High-velocity impact tests were conducted to simulate hard projectile impacts representative of aircraft collisions against NPP structures. Complementary finite element analyses were performed to examine two key design parameters: steel liner thickness and angle stiffeners spacing. The results demonstrated that wider rebar spacing (180 mm vs. 130 mm) led to reduced impact resistance. Incorporating a rear steel liner significantly enhanced impact resistance, effectively preventing perforation when the liner thickness was approximately 2 % of the panel thickness. Beyond this threshold, additional increases in thickness yielded only marginal improvements. Similarly, reducing stiffener spacing improved resistance, though the improvement plateaued below 160 mm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50318,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 105554"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X25003331","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite growing interest in impact-resistant structures, including those used in nuclear power plants (NPPs), previous studies are limited in number and are often conducted under experimental conditions that deviate from actual construction practices. Although NPP structures typically incorporate dense steel reinforcement, the role of reinforcing steel in enhancing impact resistance has often been overlooked. The combined influence of rebar detailing and welded steel liner systems—both integral to real-world NPP construction—has not been systematically investigated, leaving a critical gap in understanding their combined contribution under impact loading. To address this gap, this study presents a comprehensive experimental and numerical investigation of the impact resistance of reinforced concrete panels with varying rebar detailing and rear steel liners. High-velocity impact tests were conducted to simulate hard projectile impacts representative of aircraft collisions against NPP structures. Complementary finite element analyses were performed to examine two key design parameters: steel liner thickness and angle stiffeners spacing. The results demonstrated that wider rebar spacing (180 mm vs. 130 mm) led to reduced impact resistance. Incorporating a rear steel liner significantly enhanced impact resistance, effectively preventing perforation when the liner thickness was approximately 2 % of the panel thickness. Beyond this threshold, additional increases in thickness yielded only marginal improvements. Similarly, reducing stiffener spacing improved resistance, though the improvement plateaued below 160 mm.
钢筋结构和衬钢细部对钢筋混凝土板局部冲击响应的影响
尽管人们对抗冲击结构越来越感兴趣,包括用于核电站(NPPs)的抗冲击结构,但以前的研究数量有限,而且往往是在偏离实际建设实践的实验条件下进行的。虽然NPP结构通常采用密集的钢筋,但钢筋在增强抗冲击性方面的作用往往被忽视。钢筋细部和焊接钢衬垫系统的综合影响——两者都是实际核电站建设的组成部分——尚未得到系统的研究,在理解它们在冲击载荷下的综合贡献方面留下了一个关键的空白。为了解决这一差距,本研究对具有不同钢筋细部和后衬钢的钢筋混凝土板的抗冲击性进行了全面的实验和数值研究。采用高速冲击试验模拟了飞机撞击NPP结构的典型硬弹丸冲击。互补有限元分析进行了检查两个关键的设计参数:钢衬板厚度和角加强筋间距。结果表明,更宽的钢筋间距(180mm vs. 130mm)导致抗冲击性降低。后衬钢显著增强了抗冲击性,当衬钢厚度约为面板厚度的2%时,可有效防止穿孔。超过这个阈值,厚度的额外增加只能产生微小的改善。同样,减小加强筋间距也能改善阻力,但这种改善在160 mm以下趋于稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Impact Engineering
International Journal of Impact Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.70%
发文量
241
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Impact Engineering, established in 1983 publishes original research findings related to the response of structures, components and materials subjected to impact, blast and high-rate loading. Areas relevant to the journal encompass the following general topics and those associated with them: -Behaviour and failure of structures and materials under impact and blast loading -Systems for protection and absorption of impact and blast loading -Terminal ballistics -Dynamic behaviour and failure of materials including plasticity and fracture -Stress waves -Structural crashworthiness -High-rate mechanical and forming processes -Impact, blast and high-rate loading/measurement techniques and their applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书