Flow metering with swirl-cone throttling device and physics-informed neural networks: A comparative study of multi-differential pressure signal combinations
Fachun Liang , Changrong Li , Boyu Duan , Weibiao Zheng , Manqing Jin , Henan Wang , Mengyuan Li
{"title":"Flow metering with swirl-cone throttling device and physics-informed neural networks: A comparative study of multi-differential pressure signal combinations","authors":"Fachun Liang , Changrong Li , Boyu Duan , Weibiao Zheng , Manqing Jin , Henan Wang , Mengyuan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2025.103086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Throttle-based multiphase flow measurement methods have been widely employed in industrial applications due to their simplicity and cost-effectiveness. Among these methods, the measurement accuracy significantly depends on the precise detection and utilization of differential pressure signals. To address the poor flow pattern adaptability of traditional methods and the limited generalization capability of empirical-formula-based approaches, this study proposes an innovative online gas-liquid two-phase flow measurement method. Specifically, we designed an integrated swirl-cone throttling device capable of simultaneously acquiring multi-point axial and radial differential pressures, while also reducing the impact of flow pattern variations on flow measurement. These differential pressure signals, combined with the gas-liquid density ratio, serve as input features for a feedforward neural network, enabling simultaneous predictions of total mass flow rate (<em>M</em><sub>TP</sub>) and quality (<em>x</em><sub>G</sub>). To further enhance the model's physical consistency and extrapolation capabilities, the throttling model equation was embedded as a physical constraint within the neural network's loss function during training. Comparative analyses of three differential pressure combination schemes demonstrate the significant impact of pressure signal selection on measurement accuracy. Among these, Differential Pressure Combination-C (DPC-C) exhibited optimal performance, with <em>M</em><sub>TP</sub> prediction errors predominantly within ±5 % (MAPE of 2.36 %) and <em>x</em><sub>G</sub> prediction errors mainly within ±10 % (MAPE of 4.08 %). The proposed method not only ensures high-precision, real-time measurement without markedly increasing pressure loss but also features compact structure, ease of deployment, and superior adaptability, making it particularly suitable for complex industrial operating environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50440,"journal":{"name":"Flow Measurement and Instrumentation","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 103086"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow Measurement and Instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095559862500278X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Throttle-based multiphase flow measurement methods have been widely employed in industrial applications due to their simplicity and cost-effectiveness. Among these methods, the measurement accuracy significantly depends on the precise detection and utilization of differential pressure signals. To address the poor flow pattern adaptability of traditional methods and the limited generalization capability of empirical-formula-based approaches, this study proposes an innovative online gas-liquid two-phase flow measurement method. Specifically, we designed an integrated swirl-cone throttling device capable of simultaneously acquiring multi-point axial and radial differential pressures, while also reducing the impact of flow pattern variations on flow measurement. These differential pressure signals, combined with the gas-liquid density ratio, serve as input features for a feedforward neural network, enabling simultaneous predictions of total mass flow rate (MTP) and quality (xG). To further enhance the model's physical consistency and extrapolation capabilities, the throttling model equation was embedded as a physical constraint within the neural network's loss function during training. Comparative analyses of three differential pressure combination schemes demonstrate the significant impact of pressure signal selection on measurement accuracy. Among these, Differential Pressure Combination-C (DPC-C) exhibited optimal performance, with MTP prediction errors predominantly within ±5 % (MAPE of 2.36 %) and xG prediction errors mainly within ±10 % (MAPE of 4.08 %). The proposed method not only ensures high-precision, real-time measurement without markedly increasing pressure loss but also features compact structure, ease of deployment, and superior adaptability, making it particularly suitable for complex industrial operating environments.
基于节流的多相流测量方法由于其简单和成本效益而广泛应用于工业应用。在这些方法中,测量精度很大程度上取决于对差压信号的精确检测和利用。针对传统方法流型适应性差以及基于经验公式的方法泛化能力有限的问题,本研究提出了一种创新的气液两相流在线测量方法。具体来说,我们设计了一个集成的旋锥节流装置,能够同时获取多点轴向和径向压差,同时也减少了流型变化对流量测量的影响。这些压差信号与气液密度比相结合,作为前馈神经网络的输入特征,可以同时预测总质量流量(MTP)和质量(xG)。为了进一步增强模型的物理一致性和外推能力,在训练过程中将节流模型方程作为物理约束嵌入到神经网络的损失函数中。对三种压差组合方案的对比分析表明,压力信号的选择对测量精度有显著影响。其中,差压组合- c (DPC-C)表现最佳,MTP预测误差主要在±5%以内(MAPE为2.36%),xG预测误差主要在±10%以内(MAPE为4.08%)。该方法不仅保证了高精度、实时测量,而且不会显著增加压力损失,而且结构紧凑、易于部署、适应性强,特别适用于复杂的工业操作环境。
期刊介绍:
Flow Measurement and Instrumentation is dedicated to disseminating the latest research results on all aspects of flow measurement, in both closed conduits and open channels. The design of flow measurement systems involves a wide variety of multidisciplinary activities including modelling the flow sensor, the fluid flow and the sensor/fluid interactions through the use of computation techniques; the development of advanced transducer systems and their associated signal processing and the laboratory and field assessment of the overall system under ideal and disturbed conditions.
FMI is the essential forum for critical information exchange, and contributions are particularly encouraged in the following areas of interest:
Modelling: the application of mathematical and computational modelling to the interaction of fluid dynamics with flowmeters, including flowmeter behaviour, improved flowmeter design and installation problems. Application of CAD/CAE techniques to flowmeter modelling are eligible.
Design and development: the detailed design of the flowmeter head and/or signal processing aspects of novel flowmeters. Emphasis is given to papers identifying new sensor configurations, multisensor flow measurement systems, non-intrusive flow metering techniques and the application of microelectronic techniques in smart or intelligent systems.
Calibration techniques: including descriptions of new or existing calibration facilities and techniques, calibration data from different flowmeter types, and calibration intercomparison data from different laboratories.
Installation effect data: dealing with the effects of non-ideal flow conditions on flowmeters. Papers combining a theoretical understanding of flowmeter behaviour with experimental work are particularly welcome.