In-depth analysis of the synergistic effects of red mud, circulating fluidized bed fly ash and desulfurization gypsum in the preparation of foam lightweight soil: Reaction mechanism, performance optimization and carbon emission analysis
Jiarui Gu , Yujie Shao , Chao Wei , Zinuo Tian , Zengqi Zhang , Xiaoming Liu , Junyong Wang , Lilei Zhu , Chunjiang Wang , Jianying Zhang
{"title":"In-depth analysis of the synergistic effects of red mud, circulating fluidized bed fly ash and desulfurization gypsum in the preparation of foam lightweight soil: Reaction mechanism, performance optimization and carbon emission analysis","authors":"Jiarui Gu , Yujie Shao , Chao Wei , Zinuo Tian , Zengqi Zhang , Xiaoming Liu , Junyong Wang , Lilei Zhu , Chunjiang Wang , Jianying Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.108029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Foam lightweight soil (FLS) is a kind of porous lightweight engineering material with low density, high fluidity, and controllable strength. It is widely used in civil engineering in the fields of filling, roadbed reinforcement, and slope support. This study developed a novel FLS through synergistic utilization of red mud (RM), circulating fluidized bed fly ash (CFA), and desulfurized gypsum (DG). The response surface method (RSM) was used to design 16 sets of experiments and to predict the mechanical properties of the FLS. Moreover, the reaction mechanisms, compound synergistic effects and carbon emissions of the solid wastes were analyzed in depth. The results revealed that when the RM dosage was less than 50 %, the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of FLS tended to increase and then decreased with increasing CFA dosage and decreasing DG dosage. The prediction result of the RSM indicated that the 7 d and 28 d UCS of FLS can be more than 1.8 MPa and 2.1 MPa, respectively, at solid waste doses greater than 50 %. Microanalysis revealed that the UCS of FLS was influenced by both the hydration products and the pore structure. Too much RM incorporation leads to more macropores and connecting pores in FLS, which is not conducive to strength. In addition, the carbon emission and social cost of carbon of the FLS were approximately 45.476 kgCO<sub>2</sub>/m<sup>3</sup> and 2.85$, respectively. A comparison of results from other studies revealed that each cubic meter of FLS reduces <span><math><msub><mrow><mtext>E</mtext></mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext>CO</mtext></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></msub></math></span> and SCC by approximately 75.2∼86.7 % while ensuring that the performance meets the required engineering requirements. This paper provides a theory for the preparation of solid waste-based FLS in roadbed filler and slope support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 108029"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025012960","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Foam lightweight soil (FLS) is a kind of porous lightweight engineering material with low density, high fluidity, and controllable strength. It is widely used in civil engineering in the fields of filling, roadbed reinforcement, and slope support. This study developed a novel FLS through synergistic utilization of red mud (RM), circulating fluidized bed fly ash (CFA), and desulfurized gypsum (DG). The response surface method (RSM) was used to design 16 sets of experiments and to predict the mechanical properties of the FLS. Moreover, the reaction mechanisms, compound synergistic effects and carbon emissions of the solid wastes were analyzed in depth. The results revealed that when the RM dosage was less than 50 %, the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of FLS tended to increase and then decreased with increasing CFA dosage and decreasing DG dosage. The prediction result of the RSM indicated that the 7 d and 28 d UCS of FLS can be more than 1.8 MPa and 2.1 MPa, respectively, at solid waste doses greater than 50 %. Microanalysis revealed that the UCS of FLS was influenced by both the hydration products and the pore structure. Too much RM incorporation leads to more macropores and connecting pores in FLS, which is not conducive to strength. In addition, the carbon emission and social cost of carbon of the FLS were approximately 45.476 kgCO2/m3 and 2.85$, respectively. A comparison of results from other studies revealed that each cubic meter of FLS reduces and SCC by approximately 75.2∼86.7 % while ensuring that the performance meets the required engineering requirements. This paper provides a theory for the preparation of solid waste-based FLS in roadbed filler and slope support.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.