Generative AI outperforms humans in social media engagement: Evidence from GPT-4 and the FIIT model

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Jiacheng Huang, Alvin Zhou
{"title":"Generative AI outperforms humans in social media engagement: Evidence from GPT-4 and the FIIT model","authors":"Jiacheng Huang,&nbsp;Alvin Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This multi-study paper demonstrates that large language model-generated social media posts (via GPT-4) outperform human-written messages in driving digital engagement. Using a dataset of Fortune 500 Twitter posts, Study 1 introduces and validates the FIIT model – Fluency, Interactivity, Information, and Tone – a linguistic framework explaining why AI-optimized content attracts more likes, comments, and shares. Study 2 experimentally confirms that consumers prefer AI-generated posts, while Study 3 shows that even trained public relations professionals, despite FIIT instruction and monetary incentives, cannot match AI performance. Together, these studies provide large-scale, multi-method evidence that generative AI can outperform human communicators in measurable engagement outcomes. The paper advances computational grounded theory in strategic communication and discusses implications for public relations practice, research, and education in the era of generative AI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 102643"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811125001055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This multi-study paper demonstrates that large language model-generated social media posts (via GPT-4) outperform human-written messages in driving digital engagement. Using a dataset of Fortune 500 Twitter posts, Study 1 introduces and validates the FIIT model – Fluency, Interactivity, Information, and Tone – a linguistic framework explaining why AI-optimized content attracts more likes, comments, and shares. Study 2 experimentally confirms that consumers prefer AI-generated posts, while Study 3 shows that even trained public relations professionals, despite FIIT instruction and monetary incentives, cannot match AI performance. Together, these studies provide large-scale, multi-method evidence that generative AI can outperform human communicators in measurable engagement outcomes. The paper advances computational grounded theory in strategic communication and discusses implications for public relations practice, research, and education in the era of generative AI.
生成式人工智能在社交媒体参与方面优于人类:来自GPT-4和FIIT模型的证据
这篇多研究论文表明,大型语言模型生成的社交媒体帖子(通过GPT-4)在推动数字参与方面优于人类撰写的信息。研究1使用《财富》500强Twitter帖子的数据集,介绍并验证了FIIT模型——流畅性、交互性、信息和语气——这是一个语言框架,解释了为什么人工智能优化的内容吸引了更多的点赞、评论和分享。研究2通过实验证实,消费者更喜欢人工智能生成的帖子,而研究3表明,即使是训练有素的公关专业人员,尽管有FIIT指导和金钱激励,也无法与人工智能的表现相提并论。总之,这些研究提供了大规模、多方法的证据,证明生成式人工智能在可衡量的参与结果方面优于人类沟通者。本文提出了基于计算的战略传播理论,并讨论了在生成式人工智能时代公共关系实践、研究和教育的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信