Exploring spatiotemporal dynamic of metro ridership and the influence of built environment factors at the station level: A case study of Nanjing, China

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Qvshun Wang , Zhuanglin Ma , Xing Yang , Steven I-Jy Chien , Shengrui Zhang , Yifan Yin
{"title":"Exploring spatiotemporal dynamic of metro ridership and the influence of built environment factors at the station level: A case study of Nanjing, China","authors":"Qvshun Wang ,&nbsp;Zhuanglin Ma ,&nbsp;Xing Yang ,&nbsp;Steven I-Jy Chien ,&nbsp;Shengrui Zhang ,&nbsp;Yifan Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While previous research has examined the impact of built environment factors on urban rail transit (URT) station ridership, there has been limited focus on the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of these effects and the variation in ridership patterns. To address this gap, this study investigates the spatiotemporal relationship between URT station ridership and the built environment by integrating smart card data (SCD) with point of interest (POI) data. Using the Nanjing rail transit system in China as a case study, we apply the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to classify URT stations based on hourly ridership data over ten consecutive weekdays. The Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) model is then used to explore how the built environment influences various ridership patterns, including daily totals, peak hours (AM/PM), and boarding/alighting across different station types. The results show that GMM outperforms the K-means clustering algorithm, identifying six distinct station types. Furthermore, the MGWR model demonstrates greater reliability than both the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) models. It reveals that the variables influencing ridership differ between MGWR models, with single-function stations being affected by distinct factors, while mixed-use stations share common influencing variables. Moreover, the relative explanatory power analysis reveals that land use typically demonstrates the strongest explanatory power across most station types, while specific factors, such as residential amenities, office facilities, and shopping facilities, play dominant roles across different station types and time periods. This study contributes to understanding spatial variations in the relationship between station-level ridership and the built environment, offering empirical evidence for context-specific transit and land-use planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104440"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096669232500331X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While previous research has examined the impact of built environment factors on urban rail transit (URT) station ridership, there has been limited focus on the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of these effects and the variation in ridership patterns. To address this gap, this study investigates the spatiotemporal relationship between URT station ridership and the built environment by integrating smart card data (SCD) with point of interest (POI) data. Using the Nanjing rail transit system in China as a case study, we apply the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to classify URT stations based on hourly ridership data over ten consecutive weekdays. The Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) model is then used to explore how the built environment influences various ridership patterns, including daily totals, peak hours (AM/PM), and boarding/alighting across different station types. The results show that GMM outperforms the K-means clustering algorithm, identifying six distinct station types. Furthermore, the MGWR model demonstrates greater reliability than both the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) models. It reveals that the variables influencing ridership differ between MGWR models, with single-function stations being affected by distinct factors, while mixed-use stations share common influencing variables. Moreover, the relative explanatory power analysis reveals that land use typically demonstrates the strongest explanatory power across most station types, while specific factors, such as residential amenities, office facilities, and shopping facilities, play dominant roles across different station types and time periods. This study contributes to understanding spatial variations in the relationship between station-level ridership and the built environment, offering empirical evidence for context-specific transit and land-use planning.
地铁客流量时空动态及车站层面建筑环境因素影响研究——以南京市为例
虽然以前的研究已经研究了建筑环境因素对城市轨道交通(URT)车站客流量的影响,但对这些影响的时空异质性和客流量模式变化的关注有限。为了解决这一差距,本研究通过整合智能卡数据(SCD)和兴趣点(POI)数据,研究了城市轨道交通车站客流量与建成环境之间的时空关系。以南京轨道交通系统为例,基于连续10个工作日的小时客流量数据,应用高斯混合模型(GMM)对轨道交通站点进行分类。然后使用多尺度地理加权回归(MGWR)模型来探索建筑环境如何影响各种乘客模式,包括每日总数,高峰时间(上午/下午)以及不同车站类型的上车/下车。结果表明,GMM优于k均值聚类算法,可以识别出6种不同的站点类型。此外,MGWR模型比普通最小二乘(OLS)和地理加权回归(GWR)模型具有更高的可靠性。结果表明,影响客流量的变量在不同的MGWR模型中存在差异,单一功能站点受不同因素的影响,而混合功能站点具有共同的影响变量。此外,相对解释力分析显示,土地利用在大多数站点类型中具有最强的解释力,而特定因素,如居住设施、办公设施和购物设施,在不同站点类型和时间段中起主导作用。该研究有助于理解车站客流量与建筑环境之间的空间变化关系,为特定环境的交通和土地利用规划提供经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信