{"title":"Enhancing diabetic retinopathy diagnosis and grading: a retrospective study on AI-assisted decision making and cost analysis.","authors":"Xieyang Xu,Jiaying Zhang,Xuefei Song,Xinyi Liu,Yan Liu,Lili Feng,Yun Su,Yan Li,Linna Lu,Xianqun Fan","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2025-327442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND/AIMS\r\nDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major ocular complication of diabetes mellitus. While artificial intelligence (AI)-based DR screening tools have gained widespread adoption, most research focuses on comparing AI performance with human, with limited attention to AI's role as assistants. This study evaluates the impact of AI-assisted decision-making on DR diagnosis and grading based on colour fundus photographs (CFP) and ultra-widefield fundus (UWF) images.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA total of 224 retinal images were analysed by 21 ophthalmologists and primary care physicians (PCPs) in China. Participants independently diagnosed and graded DR based on CFP and UWF images. After a 1-week interval, they repeated the task with AI assistance. Diagnosis accuracy was compared with a gold standard before and after AI assistance. Incremental costs and accuracy improvements were assessed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) models.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAI assistance significantly improved DR diagnosis accuracy for both CFP and UWF images. For CFP, accuracy increased from 79.90% to 85.68% for PCPs, 81.19% to 88.69% for ophthalmic residents and 81.41% to 88.05% for ophthalmic attendings. Similar improvements were observed for UWF, with accuracy rising from 83.62% to 89.66% for residents and from 81.31% to 88.98% for attendings. GEE analysis revealed an incremental cost of 4.79 units and an accuracy improvement of 0.35 units with AI assistance.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nAI assistance shows potential in improving the accuracy of DR diagnosis and grading. Despite the associated costs, AI enables ophthalmologists to achieve superior diagnosis, facilitating earlier DR detection and treatment.","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2025-327442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major ocular complication of diabetes mellitus. While artificial intelligence (AI)-based DR screening tools have gained widespread adoption, most research focuses on comparing AI performance with human, with limited attention to AI's role as assistants. This study evaluates the impact of AI-assisted decision-making on DR diagnosis and grading based on colour fundus photographs (CFP) and ultra-widefield fundus (UWF) images.
METHODS
A total of 224 retinal images were analysed by 21 ophthalmologists and primary care physicians (PCPs) in China. Participants independently diagnosed and graded DR based on CFP and UWF images. After a 1-week interval, they repeated the task with AI assistance. Diagnosis accuracy was compared with a gold standard before and after AI assistance. Incremental costs and accuracy improvements were assessed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) models.
RESULTS
AI assistance significantly improved DR diagnosis accuracy for both CFP and UWF images. For CFP, accuracy increased from 79.90% to 85.68% for PCPs, 81.19% to 88.69% for ophthalmic residents and 81.41% to 88.05% for ophthalmic attendings. Similar improvements were observed for UWF, with accuracy rising from 83.62% to 89.66% for residents and from 81.31% to 88.98% for attendings. GEE analysis revealed an incremental cost of 4.79 units and an accuracy improvement of 0.35 units with AI assistance.
CONCLUSION
AI assistance shows potential in improving the accuracy of DR diagnosis and grading. Despite the associated costs, AI enables ophthalmologists to achieve superior diagnosis, facilitating earlier DR detection and treatment.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.