Enhancing diabetic retinopathy diagnosis and grading: a retrospective study on AI-assisted decision making and cost analysis.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Xieyang Xu,Jiaying Zhang,Xuefei Song,Xinyi Liu,Yan Liu,Lili Feng,Yun Su,Yan Li,Linna Lu,Xianqun Fan
{"title":"Enhancing diabetic retinopathy diagnosis and grading: a retrospective study on AI-assisted decision making and cost analysis.","authors":"Xieyang Xu,Jiaying Zhang,Xuefei Song,Xinyi Liu,Yan Liu,Lili Feng,Yun Su,Yan Li,Linna Lu,Xianqun Fan","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2025-327442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND/AIMS\r\nDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major ocular complication of diabetes mellitus. While artificial intelligence (AI)-based DR screening tools have gained widespread adoption, most research focuses on comparing AI performance with human, with limited attention to AI's role as assistants. This study evaluates the impact of AI-assisted decision-making on DR diagnosis and grading based on colour fundus photographs (CFP) and ultra-widefield fundus (UWF) images.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA total of 224 retinal images were analysed by 21 ophthalmologists and primary care physicians (PCPs) in China. Participants independently diagnosed and graded DR based on CFP and UWF images. After a 1-week interval, they repeated the task with AI assistance. Diagnosis accuracy was compared with a gold standard before and after AI assistance. Incremental costs and accuracy improvements were assessed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) models.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAI assistance significantly improved DR diagnosis accuracy for both CFP and UWF images. For CFP, accuracy increased from 79.90% to 85.68% for PCPs, 81.19% to 88.69% for ophthalmic residents and 81.41% to 88.05% for ophthalmic attendings. Similar improvements were observed for UWF, with accuracy rising from 83.62% to 89.66% for residents and from 81.31% to 88.98% for attendings. GEE analysis revealed an incremental cost of 4.79 units and an accuracy improvement of 0.35 units with AI assistance.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nAI assistance shows potential in improving the accuracy of DR diagnosis and grading. Despite the associated costs, AI enables ophthalmologists to achieve superior diagnosis, facilitating earlier DR detection and treatment.","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2025-327442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major ocular complication of diabetes mellitus. While artificial intelligence (AI)-based DR screening tools have gained widespread adoption, most research focuses on comparing AI performance with human, with limited attention to AI's role as assistants. This study evaluates the impact of AI-assisted decision-making on DR diagnosis and grading based on colour fundus photographs (CFP) and ultra-widefield fundus (UWF) images. METHODS A total of 224 retinal images were analysed by 21 ophthalmologists and primary care physicians (PCPs) in China. Participants independently diagnosed and graded DR based on CFP and UWF images. After a 1-week interval, they repeated the task with AI assistance. Diagnosis accuracy was compared with a gold standard before and after AI assistance. Incremental costs and accuracy improvements were assessed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) models. RESULTS AI assistance significantly improved DR diagnosis accuracy for both CFP and UWF images. For CFP, accuracy increased from 79.90% to 85.68% for PCPs, 81.19% to 88.69% for ophthalmic residents and 81.41% to 88.05% for ophthalmic attendings. Similar improvements were observed for UWF, with accuracy rising from 83.62% to 89.66% for residents and from 81.31% to 88.98% for attendings. GEE analysis revealed an incremental cost of 4.79 units and an accuracy improvement of 0.35 units with AI assistance. CONCLUSION AI assistance shows potential in improving the accuracy of DR diagnosis and grading. Despite the associated costs, AI enables ophthalmologists to achieve superior diagnosis, facilitating earlier DR detection and treatment.
加强糖尿病视网膜病变的诊断和分级:人工智能辅助决策和成本分析的回顾性研究。
背景/目的:糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是糖尿病的主要眼部并发症。虽然基于人工智能(AI)的DR筛选工具已经被广泛采用,但大多数研究都集中在将人工智能的表现与人类进行比较,而很少关注人工智能作为助手的作用。本研究评估了基于彩色眼底照片(CFP)和超广角眼底(UWF)图像的人工智能辅助决策对DR诊断和分级的影响。方法对全国21名眼科医生和初级保健医生(pcp)的224张视网膜图像进行分析。参与者根据CFP和UWF图像独立诊断和分级DR。间隔一周后,他们在人工智能的帮助下重复这个任务。将人工智能辅助前后的诊断准确性作为金标准进行比较。使用广义估计方程(GEE)模型评估增量成本和精度改进。结果辅助诊断可显著提高CFP和UWF影像的诊断准确率。对于CFP, pcp的准确率从79.90%提高到85.68%,眼科住院医师的准确率从81.19%提高到88.69%,眼科主治医师的准确率从81.41%提高到88.05%。UWF也有类似的改善,住院医生的准确率从83.62%上升到89.66%,主治医生的准确率从81.31%上升到88.98%。GEE分析显示,人工智能辅助下的增量成本为4.79个单位,准确性提高了0.35个单位。结论人工智能辅助在提高DR诊断和分级准确性方面具有一定的潜力。尽管有相关的成本,但人工智能使眼科医生能够实现卓越的诊断,促进早期DR的发现和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信