Impact of Case-based Learning on Critical Thinking in Clinical Decision-making Among Student Nurses of Kampala International University, Uganda.

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-10-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S547292
Getrude Uzoma Obeagu, Tukur Muhammad
{"title":"Impact of Case-based Learning on Critical Thinking in Clinical Decision-making Among Student Nurses of Kampala International University, Uganda.","authors":"Getrude Uzoma Obeagu, Tukur Muhammad","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S547292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Case-based learning (CBL) is a student-centered pedagogy that introduces students to real-life scenarios by presenting an authentic case, mirroring situations encountered in clinical practice. It serves as a bridge between theoretical knowledge and practical applications in nursing practice, fostering development of critical thinking skills in clinical decision-making by providing practical and immersive learning experiences to students. This study examined the impact of CBL on critical thinking in clinical decision-making among student nurses at Kampala International University (KIU), Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>-The study used descriptive design with criterion purposive sampling. 28 students nurses consented and participated in the study. The procedure involved CBL pedagogy, implemented using framework for teaching that was adopted and adapted by researchers and prepared instructional content on \"Anemia in Pregnancy\". The instrument for data collection was the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST) questionnaire (34-point scale). Collected data were analyzed using percentages, descriptive statistics and ANOVA for sub-scale scores with a significance <i>P</i>-value of <0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Very few (7.1%) participants had strong, whereas majority (92.9%) had superior overall CCTST scores. Participants' CCTST total mean score was 27.39, sub-scale analysis 5.79, evaluation 3.96, inference 5.64, deductive reasoning 5.54, and inductive reasoning 6.46 as their mean scores. CBL was a statistically significant factor influencing participants' scores in analysis (<i>P</i> =0.016), evaluation (<i>P</i> =0.007), and deductive reasoning (<i>P</i> =0.025) but did not have a statistically significant effect on inference (<i>P</i> =0.932) or inductive reasoning (<i>P</i> =0.670) sub-scale scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As a pedagogy, CBL has an excellent impact on KIU student nurses' critical thinking in clinical decision-making, as shown by study findings. However, there is a need to use more than one student-centered pedagogy to transfer adequate knowledge in curriculum to student nurses and strengthen clinical teaching to enhance their clinical management skills were recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"1861-1868"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S547292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Case-based learning (CBL) is a student-centered pedagogy that introduces students to real-life scenarios by presenting an authentic case, mirroring situations encountered in clinical practice. It serves as a bridge between theoretical knowledge and practical applications in nursing practice, fostering development of critical thinking skills in clinical decision-making by providing practical and immersive learning experiences to students. This study examined the impact of CBL on critical thinking in clinical decision-making among student nurses at Kampala International University (KIU), Uganda.

Methodology: -The study used descriptive design with criterion purposive sampling. 28 students nurses consented and participated in the study. The procedure involved CBL pedagogy, implemented using framework for teaching that was adopted and adapted by researchers and prepared instructional content on "Anemia in Pregnancy". The instrument for data collection was the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST) questionnaire (34-point scale). Collected data were analyzed using percentages, descriptive statistics and ANOVA for sub-scale scores with a significance P-value of <0.05.

Results: Very few (7.1%) participants had strong, whereas majority (92.9%) had superior overall CCTST scores. Participants' CCTST total mean score was 27.39, sub-scale analysis 5.79, evaluation 3.96, inference 5.64, deductive reasoning 5.54, and inductive reasoning 6.46 as their mean scores. CBL was a statistically significant factor influencing participants' scores in analysis (P =0.016), evaluation (P =0.007), and deductive reasoning (P =0.025) but did not have a statistically significant effect on inference (P =0.932) or inductive reasoning (P =0.670) sub-scale scores.

Conclusion: As a pedagogy, CBL has an excellent impact on KIU student nurses' critical thinking in clinical decision-making, as shown by study findings. However, there is a need to use more than one student-centered pedagogy to transfer adequate knowledge in curriculum to student nurses and strengthen clinical teaching to enhance their clinical management skills were recommended.

Abstract Image

案例学习对乌干达坎帕拉国际大学护生临床决策批判性思维的影响
背景:案例为基础的学习(CBL)是一种以学生为中心的教学方法,通过呈现真实的案例,反映临床实践中遇到的情况,向学生介绍现实生活中的场景。它是理论知识与护理实践实际应用之间的桥梁,通过为学生提供实际和身临其境的学习体验,培养他们在临床决策中的批判性思维技能。本研究考察了CBL对乌干达坎帕拉国际大学(KIU)护士学生临床决策批判性思维的影响。方法:研究采用描述性设计和标准目的抽样。28名实习护士同意并参与了本研究。该程序涉及CBL教学法,使用由研究人员采用和调整的教学框架实施,并编写了关于“妊娠贫血”的教学内容。数据收集工具为加州批判性思维技能测试(CCTST)问卷(34分制)。收集的数据使用百分比、描述性统计和方差分析对子量表得分进行分析,结果的显著性p值为:极少数(7.1%)参与者具有很强的CCTST总分,而大多数(92.9%)参与者具有较好的CCTST总分。参与者的CCTST总平均得分为27.39分,分量表分析5.79分,评价3.96分,推理5.64分,演绎推理5.54分,归纳推理6.46分。CBL是影响被试在分析(P =0.016)、评价(P =0.007)和演绎推理(P =0.025)得分的有统计学意义的因素,但对推理(P =0.932)和归纳推理(P =0.670)分量表得分没有统计学意义的影响。结论:研究结果表明,作为一种教学法,CBL对KIU学生护士临床决策的批判性思维有很好的影响。然而,有必要使用不止一种以学生为中心的教学法,将足够的课程知识传授给学生护士,并加强临床教学,以提高他们的临床管理技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信