Clinical Application of Muscle Energy Technique for Knee Function Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-10-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S537482
Ling Xu, Jingjing Li, Qing Sheng, Guangling Wang
{"title":"Clinical Application of Muscle Energy Technique for Knee Function Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Ling Xu, Jingjing Li, Qing Sheng, Guangling Wang","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S537482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the impact of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) on functional recovery and long-term prognosis in patients undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) during the early postoperative rehabilitation phase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty patients who underwent TKA from January 2021 to December 2021 at the Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, and treated by the same team of doctors were selected. The patients were computer-randomized into two groups: a control group comprising 36 patients receiving conventional rehabilitation therapy, and an experimental group comprising 42 patients receiving Muscle Energy Technique (MET) therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in measurements of active knee joint range of motion, HSS scores, and VAS pain scores at 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively (P < 0.001). No statistical difference was noted in the TUG test at 1 month postoperatively (P > 0.001), while a significant difference was observed at 3 months (P < 0.001). Compared to the control group, the MET group exhibited a 19.3% increase in knee joint activity at 3 days post-TKA. The pain score in the conventional group was 1.34 times that of the MET group. One month post-intervention, the HSS scores of the MET group were 22.2% higher than those of the control group. At 3 months postoperatively, the MET group's HSS scores remained 14.2% higher, and the conventional group's pain score was 3.67 times that of the MET group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This preliminary study indicates that MET can enhance knee joint functionality. It demonstrated short-term efficacy in improving knee function by activating and strengthening key muscle groups, thereby improving joint mobility, muscle strength, stability, and alleviating pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"5409-5416"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12535184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S537482","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the impact of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) on functional recovery and long-term prognosis in patients undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) during the early postoperative rehabilitation phase.

Methods: Eighty patients who underwent TKA from January 2021 to December 2021 at the Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, and treated by the same team of doctors were selected. The patients were computer-randomized into two groups: a control group comprising 36 patients receiving conventional rehabilitation therapy, and an experimental group comprising 42 patients receiving Muscle Energy Technique (MET) therapy.

Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in measurements of active knee joint range of motion, HSS scores, and VAS pain scores at 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively (P < 0.001). No statistical difference was noted in the TUG test at 1 month postoperatively (P > 0.001), while a significant difference was observed at 3 months (P < 0.001). Compared to the control group, the MET group exhibited a 19.3% increase in knee joint activity at 3 days post-TKA. The pain score in the conventional group was 1.34 times that of the MET group. One month post-intervention, the HSS scores of the MET group were 22.2% higher than those of the control group. At 3 months postoperatively, the MET group's HSS scores remained 14.2% higher, and the conventional group's pain score was 3.67 times that of the MET group.

Conclusion: This preliminary study indicates that MET can enhance knee joint functionality. It demonstrated short-term efficacy in improving knee function by activating and strengthening key muscle groups, thereby improving joint mobility, muscle strength, stability, and alleviating pain.

肌能技术在全膝关节置换术后膝关节功能恢复中的临床应用。
目的:本研究旨在探讨肌能技术(MET)对全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者术后早期康复阶段功能恢复和远期预后的影响。方法:选择于2021年1月至2021年12月在南京医科大学第一附属医院骨科行TKA的患者80例,均为同一组医生治疗。这些患者被计算机随机分为两组:对照组包括36名接受常规康复治疗的患者,实验组包括42名接受肌肉能量技术(MET)治疗的患者。结果:两组患者术后3天、7天、1个月、3个月的膝关节活动度、HSS评分、VAS疼痛评分差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。术后1个月TUG测试差异无统计学意义(P < 0.001),术后3个月差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。与对照组相比,MET组在tka后3天的膝关节活动增加了19.3%。常规组疼痛评分为MET组的1.34倍。干预1个月后,MET组的HSS评分较对照组高22.2%。术后3个月,MET组HSS评分仍比常规组高14.2%,疼痛评分是MET组的3.67倍。结论:本初步研究表明MET可增强膝关节功能。它通过激活和加强关键肌群来改善膝关节功能,从而改善关节活动性、肌肉力量、稳定性和减轻疼痛,显示出短期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信