Bilateral strength balance of knee extensor and flexor muscles in female soccer players.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-10-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2025.1681804
Oscar Andrades-Ramírez, David Ulloa-Díaz, Luis Romero-Vera, Bryan Alfaro-Castillo, Gustavo Muñoz-Bustos, Carlos Jorquera-Aguilera, Claudio Carvajal-Parodi, Luis-Javier Chirosa-Ríos
{"title":"Bilateral strength balance of knee extensor and flexor muscles in female soccer players.","authors":"Oscar Andrades-Ramírez, David Ulloa-Díaz, Luis Romero-Vera, Bryan Alfaro-Castillo, Gustavo Muñoz-Bustos, Carlos Jorquera-Aguilera, Claudio Carvajal-Parodi, Luis-Javier Chirosa-Ríos","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2025.1681804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of our study was analyze the bilateral strength balance of the knee extensor and flexor muscles in female soccer players.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Participated in this study twenty-three professional female soccer players. The volunteer participants of the study were eligibly if: (a) signing of informed consent, (b) 5 years of sporting experience as a soccer player and have experience with training and evaluation of muscle strength in the lower limb, (c) participate in five weekly training sessions (d) no musculoskeletal pathology in the lower limbs 6 months prior to the evaluation date. The assessment was performed unilaterally, with peak muscle strength values recorded using the FEMD device software at a constant velocity of 0.4 m s<sup>-1</sup>. The range of motion (ROM) was 90°-0° of joint extension in the sitting position and 150°-90° of flexion in the prone position. Each participant was required to perform their maximum effort for all repetitions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bilateral strength balance measurements were obtained in the range of 10.68%-13.80% for maximum muscle strength in knee extension and 13.27%-15.21%. No significant differences (<i>p</i> > 0.05) were found in the comparison of independent means for maximum muscle strength between the knee extension and flexion in the concentric and eccentric phases. Significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and small ES (ES < 3.32) were found in peak muscle strength measurements of the dominant and non-dominant lower extremity in the unilateral comparison of the extensor muscle and the flexor muscle group in the concentric and eccentric phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the analysis of bilateral strength balance, lower indices are presented in the knee extensor compared to the flexor, these bilateral indices would reveal intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in the hamstring muscles and anterior cruciate ligament of professional soccer players.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1681804"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12531145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1681804","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of our study was analyze the bilateral strength balance of the knee extensor and flexor muscles in female soccer players.

Methodology: Participated in this study twenty-three professional female soccer players. The volunteer participants of the study were eligibly if: (a) signing of informed consent, (b) 5 years of sporting experience as a soccer player and have experience with training and evaluation of muscle strength in the lower limb, (c) participate in five weekly training sessions (d) no musculoskeletal pathology in the lower limbs 6 months prior to the evaluation date. The assessment was performed unilaterally, with peak muscle strength values recorded using the FEMD device software at a constant velocity of 0.4 m s-1. The range of motion (ROM) was 90°-0° of joint extension in the sitting position and 150°-90° of flexion in the prone position. Each participant was required to perform their maximum effort for all repetitions.

Results: Bilateral strength balance measurements were obtained in the range of 10.68%-13.80% for maximum muscle strength in knee extension and 13.27%-15.21%. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found in the comparison of independent means for maximum muscle strength between the knee extension and flexion in the concentric and eccentric phases. Significant differences (p < 0.01) and small ES (ES < 3.32) were found in peak muscle strength measurements of the dominant and non-dominant lower extremity in the unilateral comparison of the extensor muscle and the flexor muscle group in the concentric and eccentric phase.

Conclusion: In the analysis of bilateral strength balance, lower indices are presented in the knee extensor compared to the flexor, these bilateral indices would reveal intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in the hamstring muscles and anterior cruciate ligament of professional soccer players.

Abstract Image

女子足球运动员膝关节伸屈肌的双侧力量平衡。
背景:本研究的目的是分析女足球运动员双侧膝关节伸屈肌的力量平衡。方法:以23名职业女足运动员为研究对象。该研究的志愿者参与者符合以下条件:(a)签署知情同意书,(b)作为足球运动员有5年的运动经验,并有下肢肌肉力量的训练和评估经验,(c)参加五次每周的训练课程(d)在评估日期前6个月没有下肢肌肉骨骼病理。评估是单侧进行的,使用FEMD装置软件以0.4 m s-1的恒定速度记录峰值肌肉力量值。活动范围(ROM)为坐姿时关节伸展90°-0°,俯卧位时关节屈曲150°-90°。每个参与者都被要求在所有的重复中尽最大的努力。结果:双侧力量平衡测量值在膝关节伸展时最大肌力为10.68% ~ 13.80%,13.27% ~ 15.21%。在同心期和偏心期膝关节屈伸之间最大肌力的独立平均值比较中,没有发现显著差异(p > 0.05)。在同心期和偏心期,屈肌群和伸肌群单侧优势侧和非优势侧下肢的峰值肌力测量值差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01), ES小于3.32。结论:在双侧力量平衡分析中,膝关节伸肌指数低于屈肌指数,这些双侧指标可以揭示职业足球运动员腘绳肌和前交叉韧带肌肉骨骼损伤的内在和外在危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信