The effect of velocity-based resistance training (VBT) on lower-limb strength performance in male collegiate boxers: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-10-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2025.1701045
Yemin Han, Yiqing Xie, Zhen Zhang, Amador García-Ramos
{"title":"The effect of velocity-based resistance training (VBT) on lower-limb strength performance in male collegiate boxers: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yemin Han, Yiqing Xie, Zhen Zhang, Amador García-Ramos","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2025.1701045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Boxing performance heavily relies on lower-limb strength and power. Velocity-based resistance training (VBT), which adjusts load and repetition volume using real-time velocity feedback, may provide a more individualized and effective approach compared to traditional percentage-based training (PBT). However, its long-term effect on boxing-specific performance outcomes remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight male collegiate boxers were randomly assigned to a VBT group (n = 14) or a PBT group (n = 14) for an 8-week training program. Both groups performed four sets of each exercise (back squat, Bulgarian split-squat, and deadlift) at 70% of their one-repetition maximum (1RM). The VBT group performed a flexible number of repetitions until their velocity dropped below a 10% threshold, whereas the PBT group consistently performed sets of 5 repetition. Pre- and post-intervention assessments included 1RM strength, countermovement jump (CMJ) height, standing long jump (SLJ) distance, and 30 m sprint run time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All dependent variables demonstrated significant main effects of \"time\" (<i>p</i> < 0.001; averaged Hedges' g = 0.44 for VBT group and 0.23 for PBT group). Notably, significant \"time\" × \"group\" interactions were observed for the CMJ, SLJ, and 30 m sprint run (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.038), whereas no significant interactions were found for 1RM strength measures across exercises (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.163). Furthermore, when comparing the magnitude of changes between groups, the VBT group exhibited small effect size improvements in CMJ height (Hedges' g = 0.41), SLJ distance (Hedges' g = 0.56), and 30 m sprint time (Hedges' g = 0.51). In contrast, all other variables only showed trivial (Hedges' g < 0.20) differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both training programs led to comparable improvements in maximal strength (1RM) across exercises. However, VBT was more effective than PBT in enhancing performance in high-velocity tasks such as vertical and horizontal jumps and sprinting. These findings support the use of VBT to optimize neuromuscular adaptations relevant to explosive actions in male collegiate boxers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1701045"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12528053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1701045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Boxing performance heavily relies on lower-limb strength and power. Velocity-based resistance training (VBT), which adjusts load and repetition volume using real-time velocity feedback, may provide a more individualized and effective approach compared to traditional percentage-based training (PBT). However, its long-term effect on boxing-specific performance outcomes remains underexplored.

Methods: Twenty-eight male collegiate boxers were randomly assigned to a VBT group (n = 14) or a PBT group (n = 14) for an 8-week training program. Both groups performed four sets of each exercise (back squat, Bulgarian split-squat, and deadlift) at 70% of their one-repetition maximum (1RM). The VBT group performed a flexible number of repetitions until their velocity dropped below a 10% threshold, whereas the PBT group consistently performed sets of 5 repetition. Pre- and post-intervention assessments included 1RM strength, countermovement jump (CMJ) height, standing long jump (SLJ) distance, and 30 m sprint run time.

Results: All dependent variables demonstrated significant main effects of "time" (p < 0.001; averaged Hedges' g = 0.44 for VBT group and 0.23 for PBT group). Notably, significant "time" × "group" interactions were observed for the CMJ, SLJ, and 30 m sprint run (p ≤ 0.038), whereas no significant interactions were found for 1RM strength measures across exercises (p ≥ 0.163). Furthermore, when comparing the magnitude of changes between groups, the VBT group exhibited small effect size improvements in CMJ height (Hedges' g = 0.41), SLJ distance (Hedges' g = 0.56), and 30 m sprint time (Hedges' g = 0.51). In contrast, all other variables only showed trivial (Hedges' g < 0.20) differences between groups.

Conclusion: Both training programs led to comparable improvements in maximal strength (1RM) across exercises. However, VBT was more effective than PBT in enhancing performance in high-velocity tasks such as vertical and horizontal jumps and sprinting. These findings support the use of VBT to optimize neuromuscular adaptations relevant to explosive actions in male collegiate boxers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于速度的阻力训练(VBT)对男大学生拳击手下肢力量表现的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:拳击表演很大程度上依赖于下肢的力量和力量。基于速度的阻力训练(VBT),通过实时速度反馈来调整负荷和重复量,与传统的基于百分比的训练(PBT)相比,可能提供更个性化和有效的方法。然而,它对拳击特定表现结果的长期影响仍未得到充分研究。方法:28名男大学生拳击手随机分为VBT组(n = 14)和PBT组(n = 14)进行为期8周的训练。两组都以最大单次重复(1RM)的70%进行四组训练(后蹲、保加利亚式分蹲和硬举)。VBT组进行了灵活的重复次数,直到他们的速度下降到10%以下的阈值,而PBT组坚持重复5组。干预前和干预后的评估包括1RM力量、反动作跳远(CMJ)高度、立定跳远(SLJ)距离和30米冲刺跑时间。结果:所有因变量均表现出“时间”的显著主效应(p < 0.001; VBT组的平均对冲系数g = 0.44, PBT组的平均对冲系数g = 0.23)。值得注意的是,在CMJ、SLJ和30米短跑中观察到显著的“时间”ד组”相互作用(p≤0.038),而在1RM强度测量中没有发现显著的相互作用(p≥0.163)。此外,当比较各组之间的变化幅度时,VBT组在CMJ高度(Hedges' g = 0.41)、SLJ距离(Hedges' g = 0.56)和30 m冲刺时间(Hedges' g = 0.51)上表现出较小的效应量改善。相比之下,所有其他变量在组间仅显示微不足道(Hedges' g < 0.20)的差异。结论:两种训练方案在最大力量(1RM)方面都有可比性的提高。而在垂直、水平跳跃和短跑等高速度任务中,VBT比PBT更有效地提高成绩。这些发现支持使用VBT来优化与男性大学拳击手爆发性动作相关的神经肌肉适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信